UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


	☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2021


	☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 001-35366

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware	20-5157386
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2 Gansevoort Street, 9th Floor

New York, New York 10014

(Address including zip code of principal executive offices)

(781) 652-4500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of Class	Trading Symbol(s)	Exchange Name
Common Stock	FBIO	Nasdaq Capital Market
9.375% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock	FBIOP	Nasdaq Capital Market

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ⌧ No ◻

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ⌧ No ◻

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:


Large accelerated filer	◻	Accelerated filer	◻
Non-accelerated filer	⌧	Smaller reporting company	☒
		Emerging growth company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ◻

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒



Class of Stock		Outstanding Shares as of May 13, 2021
Common Stock, $0.001 par value		97,319,238
9.375% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value		3,427,138

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	1
Item 1.	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	1
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	33
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks	41
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	42

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION	42
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	42
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	43
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	80
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	80
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	80
Item 5.	Other Information	80
Item 6.	Exhibits	81

SIGNATURES		82

Table of Contents

SUMMARY RISK FACTORS

Our business is subject to risks of which you should be aware before making an investment decision. The risks described below are a summary of the principal risks associated with an investment in us and are not the only risks we face. You should carefully consider these risk factors, the risk factors described in Item 1A, and the other reports and documents that we have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). As used below and throughout this filing (including in the risk factors described in Item 1A), the words “we”, “us” and “our” may refer to Fortress Biotech, Inc. individually or together with one or more partner companies, as dictated by context.

Risks Inherent in Drug Development

●

Many of our and our partner companies’ product candidates are in early development stages and are subject to time and cost intensive regulation and clinical testing. As a result, our product candidates may never be successfully developed or commercialized.

●

Our competitors may develop treatments for our or our partner companies’ products’ target indications, which could limit our product candidates’ commercial opportunity and profitability.

Risks Pertaining to the Need for and Impact of Existing and Additional Financing Activities

●

We have a history of operating losses and we expect such losses to continue in the future.

●

We have funded our operations in part through the assumption of debt, which lending agreements may restrict our operations. Further, the occurrence of any default event under any applicable loan document could adversely affect our business.

●

Our research and development (“R&D”) programs will require additional capital, which we may be unable to raise as needed and which may impede our R&D programs, commercialization efforts, or planned acquisitions.

●

If we raise additional capital by issuing securities, our existing stockholders will be diluted.

Risks Pertaining to Our Existing Revenue Stream from Journey Medical Corporation (“Journey”)

●

Our operating income derives primarily from the sale of our partner company Journey’s dermatology products, particularly Qbrexza, Ximino, Targadox, Accutane, and Exelderm. Any issues relating to the manufacture, sale, utilization, or reimbursement of Journey’s products (including products liability claims) could significantly impact our operating results.

●

The majority of Journey’s sales derive from products that are without patent protection and/or are or may become subject to third party generic competition; the introduction of new competitor products, or an increase in market share of existing competitor products, could have a significant adverse effect on our operating income. With respect to Journey products that are covered by valid claims of issued patents, such patents may be subject to invalidation, which would harm our operating income.

●

Continued sales and coverage, including formulary inclusion without the need for a prior authorization or step edit therapy, of our products for commercial sale will depend in part on the availability of reimbursement from third-party payors. Third-party payors are increasingly examining the medical necessity and cost-effectiveness of medical products and services, in addition to their safety and efficacy, and, accordingly, significant uncertainty exists as to the reimbursement status of newly approved therapeutics.

Risks Pertaining to our Business Strategy, Structure and Organization

●

We have also entered into several arrangements under which we have agreed to contingent dispositions of partner companies and/or their assets. The failure to consummate any such transaction may impair the value of such companies and/or assets, and we may not be able to identify or execute alternative arrangements on favorable terms, if at all.

●

Our growth and success depend on our acquiring or in-licensing products or product candidates and integrating such products into our business.

●

We act as guarantor and/or indemnitor of certain obligations of our subsidiaries and affiliates, which could require us to pay substantial amounts based on the actions of said subsidiaries or affiliates.

Table of Contents

Risks Pertaining to Reliance on Third Parties

●

We rely heavily on third parties for several aspects of our operations, including manufacturing and developing product candidates, conducting clinical trials, and producing commercial supplies for products. Such reliance on third-parties reduces our ability to control every aspect of the drug development process and may hinder our ability to develop and commercialize our products in a cost-effective and timely manner.

Risks Pertaining to Intellectual Property and Potential Disputes with Licensors Thereof

●

If we are unable to obtain and maintain patent protection for our technology and products, or if the scope of the patent protection obtained is not sufficiently broad, our competitors could develop and commercialize technology and products similar or identical to ours, and our ability to successfully commercialize our technology and products may be impaired.

●

We or our licensors may be subject to costly and time-consuming litigation for infringement of third-party intellectual property rights or to enforce our or our licensors’ patents.

●

Any dispute with our licensors may affect our ability to develop or commercialize our product candidates.

Risks Pertaining to Generic Competition and Paragraph IV Litigation

●

Generic drug companies may submit applications seeking approval to market generic versions of our products.

●

In connection with these applications, generic drug companies may seek to challenge the validity and enforceability of our patents through litigation and/or with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO), such as the Paragraph IV certification made by Perrigo pertaining to the patents covering Qbrexza, a product being commercialized by our partner company Journey. Such challenges may subject us to costly and time-consuming litigation and/or PTO proceedings.

●

As a result of the loss of any patent protection from such litigation or PTO proceedings, or the “at-risk” launch by a generic competitor of our products, our products could be sold at significantly lower prices, and we could lose a significant portion of sales of that product in a short period of time, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects.

Risks Pertaining to the Commercialization of Product Candidates

●

If our products are not broadly accepted by the healthcare community, the revenues from any such product are likely to be limited.

●

We may not obtain the desired product labels or intended uses for product promotion, or favorable scheduling classifications desirable to successfully promote our products.

●

Even if a product candidate is approved, it may be subject to various post-marketing requirements, including studies or clinical trials, the results of which could cause such products to later be withdrawn from the market.

●

Any successful products liability claim related to any of our current or future product candidates may cause us to incur substantial liability and limit the commercialization of such products.

Risks Pertaining to Legislation and Regulation Affecting the Biopharmaceutical and Other Industries

●

We operate in a heavily regulated industry, and we cannot predict the impact that any future legislation or administrative or executive action may have on our operations.

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

($ in thousands except for share and per share amounts)


	March 31,		December 31,
	2021		2020
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	289,897	$	233,351
Accounts receivable, net		19,439		19,349
Inventory		2,291		1,404
Other receivables - related party		849		744
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		5,517		6,723
Total current assets		317,993		261,571

Property and equipment, net		12,291		11,923
Operating lease right-of-use asset, net		20,072		20,487
Restricted cash		1,645		1,645
Long-term investment, at fair value		23,479		17,566
Intangible asset, net		14,442		14,629
Other assets		1,121		1,013
Total assets	$	391,043	$	328,834

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	39,181	$	40,674
Deferred revenue		7,200		—
Income taxes payable		136		136
Operating lease liabilities, short-term		1,840		1,849
Partner company note payable, short-term		5,463		5,300
Total current liabilities		53,820		47,959

Notes payable, long-term (net of debt discount of $8,014 and $8,323 at March 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively)		51,986		51,677
Operating lease liabilities, long-term		22,447		22,891
Partner company note payable, long-term		5,613		7,359
Partner company convertible preferred shares		10,687		—
Partner company derivative warrant liability		362		—
Other long-term liabilities		1,903		1,949
Total liabilities		146,818		131,835

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ equity
Cumulative redeemable perpetual preferred stock, $.001 par value, 15,000,000 authorized, 5,000,000 designated Series A shares, 3,427,138 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, liquidation value of $25.00 per share		3		3
Common stock, $.001 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized, 97,263,054 and 94,877,492 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively		97		95
Additional paid-in-capital		597,384		583,000
Accumulated deficit		(491,582)		(482,760)
Total stockholders' equity attributed to the Company		105,902		100,338

Non-controlling interests		138,323		96,661
Total stockholders' equity		244,225		196,999
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	391,043	$	328,834

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

($ in thousands except for share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2021		2020
Revenue
Product revenue, net	$	10,719	$	11,946
Collaboration revenue		800		—
Revenue - related party		68		972
Net revenue		11,587		12,918

Operating expenses
Cost of goods sold - product revenue		3,908		3,810
Research and development		20,028		14,867
Research and development - licenses acquired		126		250
Selling, general and administrative		17,542		15,519
Total operating expenses		41,604		34,446
Loss from operations		(30,017)		(21,528)

Other income (expense)
Interest income		227		627
Interest expense and financing fee		(2,189)		(3,125)
Change in fair value of investments		5,913		—
Change in fair value of derivative liability		—		(42)
Total other income (expense)		3,951		(2,540)
Net loss		(26,066)		(24,068)

Less: net loss attributable to non-controlling interests		17,244		11,698
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(8,822)	$	(12,370)

Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	$	(0.32)	$	(0.38)
Net loss per common share attributable to non - controlling interests - basic and diluted	$	(0.21)	$	(0.18)
Net loss per common share attributable to common stockholders - basic and diluted	$	(0.11)	$	(0.19)

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted		80,851,671		63,496,256

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

($ in thousands)

(Unaudited)

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2021


													Total
	Series A Perpetual												Stockholders’
	Preferred Stock			Common Stock			Paid-In		Accumulated		Non-Controlling		Equity
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Capital		Deficit		Interests		(Deficit)
Balance at December 31, 2020	3,427,138	$	3	94,877,492	$	95	$	583,000	$	(482,760)	$	96,661	$	196,999
Stock-based compensation expense	—		—	—		—		3,773		—		—		3,773
Issuance of common stock related to equity plans	—		—	2,385,562		2		(2)		—		—		—
Preferred A dividends declared and paid	—		—	—		—		(2,007)		—		—		(2,007)
Partner company’s at-the-market offering, net	—		—	—		—		71,422		—		—		71,422
Partner company’s exercise of options for cash	—		—	—		—		7		—		—		7
Issuance of common stock under partner company’s ESPP	—		—	—		—		158		—		—		158
Partner company’s dividends declared and paid	—		—	—		—		(187)		—		—		(187)
Issuance of partner company’s common shares for research and development expenses	—		—	—		—		126		—		—		126
Non-controlling interest in partner companies	—		—	—		—		(58,906)		—		58,906		—
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest	—		—	—		—		—		—		(17,244)		(17,244)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	—		—	—		—		—		(8,822)		—		(8,822)
Balance at March 31, 2021	3,427,138	$	3	97,263,054	$	97	$	597,384	$	(491,582)	$	138,323	$	244,225

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

($ in thousands)

(Unaudited)

For the Three Months Ended 3/31/2020


																	Total
	Series A Perpetual																Stockholders’
	Preferred Stock			Common Stock			Shares		Treasury		Paid-In		Accumulated		Non-Controlling		Equity
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Issuable		Stock		Capital		Deficit		Interests		(Deficit)
Balance at December 31, 2019	1,341,167	$	1	74,027,425	$	74	$	500	$	—	$	461,874	$	(436,234)	$	46,317	$	72,532
Stock-based compensation expense	—		—	—		—		—		—		3,400		—		—		3,400
Issuance of common stock related to equity plans	—		—	1,952,407		2		—		—		(2)		—		—		—
Issuance of common stock for at-the-market offering, net	—		—	2,341,000		3		—		—		5,877		—		—		5,880
Preferred A dividends declared and paid	—		—	—		—		—		—		(1,207)		—		—		(1,207)
Repurchase of Series A preferred stock for cash, net	(5,000)		—	—		—		—		(70)		(2)		—				(72)
Issuance of Series A preferred stock for cash, net	718,750		1	—		—		—		—		13,066		—		—		13,067
Partner company’s at-the-market offering, net	—		—	—		—		—		—		4,910		—		—		4,910
Partner company’s exercise of warrants for cash	—		—	—		—		—		—		13		—		—		13
Issuance of common stock under partner company’s ESPP	—		—	—		—		—		—		169		—		—		169
Common shares issued for 2017 Subordinated Note Financing interest expense	—		—	251,337		—		(500)		—		500		—		—		—
Common shares issuable for 2017 Subordinated Note Financing interest expense	—		—	—		—		506		—		—		—		—		506
Common shares issuable for 2019 Notes interest expense	—		—	—		—		155		—		—		—		—		155
Non-controlling interest in partner companies	—		—	—		—		—		—		(3,438)		—		3,438		—
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest	—		—	—		—		—		—		—		—		(11,698)		(11,698)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	—		—	—		—		—		—		—		(12,370)		—		(12,370)
Balance at March 31, 2020	2,054,917	$	2	78,572,169	$	79	$	661	$	(70)	$	485,160	$	(448,604)	$	38,057	$	75,285

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

($ in thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2021		2020
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net loss	$	(26,066)	$	(24,068)
Reconciliation of net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation expense		603		527
Bad debt expense		70		—
Amortization of debt discount		309		747
Non-cash interest		221		150
Amortization of product revenue license fee		584		355
Amortization of operating lease right-of-use assets		415		403
Stock-based compensation expense		3,773		3,400
Issuance of partner company’s common shares for research and development expenses		126		—
Common shares issuable for 2017 Subordinated Note Financing interest expense		—		506
Common shares issuable for 2019 Notes interest expense		—		155
Change in fair value of derivative liability		—		42
Change in fair value of investment		(5,913)		—
Research and development-licenses acquired, expense		—		250
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents resulting from changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(160)		(2,271)
Inventory		(887)		88
Other receivables - related party		(105)		(888)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,206		(393)
Other assets		(108)		(195)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(2,457)		(612)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses - related party		—		13
Interest payable		—		39
Interest payable - related party		—		(39)
Deferred revenue		7,200		—
Lease liabilities		(453)		(54)
Other long-term liabilities		(46)		(47)
Net cash used in operating activities		(21,688)		(21,892)

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Purchase of research and development licenses		—		(1,250)
Purchase of property and equipment		(458)		(526)
Net cash used in investing activities		(458)		(1,776)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

($ in thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2021		2020
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Payment of Series A perpetual preferred stock dividends	$	(2,007)	$	(1,207)
Purchase of treasury stock		—		(70)
Payment of costs related to purchase of treasury stock		—		(2)
Proceeds from issuance of Series A perpetual preferred stock		—		14,375
Payment of costs related to issuance of Series A perpetual preferred stock		—		(1,213)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock for at-the-market offering		—		6,068
Payment of costs related to issuance of common stock for at-the-market offering		—		(188)
Proceeds from partner companies' ESPP		158		169
Partner company’s dividends declared and paid		(187)		—
Payment of costs related to partner companies' sale of stock		—		(69)
Proceeds from partner companies' at-the-market offering		72,947		4,997
Payment of costs related to partner companies' at-the-market offering		(1,584)		(87)
Payment of costs related to partner company's preferred stock offering		(13)		—
Proceeds from exercise of partner company’s warrants		—		13
Proceeds from exercise of partner company’s options		7		—
Payment of debt issuance costs associated with 2017 Subordinated Note Financing		—		(26)
Payment of debt issuance costs associated with 2018 Venture Notes		—		(7)
Payment of debt issuance costs associated with Oaktree Note		(13)		—
Repayment of partner company note payable		(1,800)		—
Proceeds from partner company convertible preferred shares		12,537		—
Payment of debt issuance costs associated with partner company convertible preferred shares		(1,353)		—
Net cash provided by financing activities		78,692		22,753

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash		56,546		(915)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period		234,996		153,432
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period	$	291,542	$	152,517

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	1,670	$	1,609



Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing and investing activities:
Settlement of restricted stock units into common stock	$	2	$	2
Common shares issued from 2017 Subordinated Note Financing interest expense	$	—	$	500
Unpaid fixed assets	$	545	$	540
Partner company's unpaid intangible assets	$	400	$	—
Unpaid debt offering cost	$	—	$	8
Unpaid partner company’s debt offering cost	$	135	$	—
Partner company derivative warrant liability associated with partner company convertible preferred shares	$	362	$	—
Unpaid at-the-market offering cost	$	—	$	6
Unpaid partner company’s at-the-market offering cost	$	25	$	—
Unpaid Series A perpetual preferred stock offering cost	$	—	$	98
Unpaid research and development licenses acquired	$	—	$	350

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. Organization and Description of Business

Fortress Biotech, Inc. (“Fortress” or the “Company”) is a biopharmaceutical company dedicated to acquiring, developing and commercializing pharmaceutical and biotechnology products and product candidates, which the Company does at the Fortress level, at its majority-owned and majority-controlled subsidiaries and joint ventures, and at entities the Company founded and in which it maintains significant minority ownership positions. Fortress has a talented and experienced business development team, comprised of scientists, doctors and finance professionals, who identify and evaluate promising products and product candidates for potential acquisition by new or existing partner companies. Fortress through its partner companies has executed such arrangements in partnership with some of the world’s foremost universities, research institutes and pharmaceutical companies, including City of Hope National Medical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Columbia University, the University of Pennsylvania, and AstraZeneca plc.

Following the exclusive license or other acquisition of the intellectual property underpinning a product or product candidate, Fortress leverages its business, scientific, regulatory, legal and financial expertise to help the partners achieve their goals. Partner companies then assess a broad range of strategic arrangements to accelerate and provide additional funding to support research and development, including joint ventures, partnerships, out-licensings, and public and private financings. To date, three partner companies are publicly-traded, and three have consummated strategic partnerships with industry leaders Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., InvaGen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“InvaGen”) (a subsidiary of Cipla Limited) and Sentynl Therapeutics, Inc. (“Sentynl”).

Several of our partner companies possess licenses to product candidate intellectual property, including Aevitas Therapeutics, Inc. (“Aevitas”), Avenue Therapeutics, Inc. (“Avenue”), Baergic Bio, Inc. (“Baergic”), Caelum Biosciences, Inc. (“Caelum”), Cellvation, Inc. (“Cellvation”), Checkpoint Therapeutics, Inc. (“Checkpoint”), Cyprium Therapeutics, Inc. (“Cyprium”), FBIO Acquisition Corp. VIII, Helocyte, Inc. (“Helocyte”), Journey Medical Corporation (“Journey” or “JMC”), Mustang Bio, Inc. (“Mustang”) and Oncogenuity, Inc. (“Oncogenuity”).

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since inception, the Company’s operations have been financed primarily through the sale of equity and debt securities, from the sale of partner companies, and the proceeds from the exercise of warrants and stock options. The Company has incurred losses from operations and negative cash flows from operating activities since inception and expects to continue to incur substantial losses for the next several years as it continues to fully develop and prepare regulatory filings and obtain regulatory approvals for its existing and new product candidates. The Company’s current cash and cash equivalents are sufficient to fund operations for at least the next 12 months. However, the Company will need to raise additional funding through strategic relationships, public or private equity or debt financings, sale of a partner company, grants or other arrangements to fully develop and prepare regulatory filings and obtain regulatory approvals for the existing and new product candidates, fund operating losses, and, if deemed appropriate, establish or secure through third parties manufacturing for the potential products, sales and marketing capabilities. If such funding is not available or not available on terms acceptable to the Company, the Company’s current development plan and plans for expansion of its general and administrative infrastructure may be curtailed. The Company also has the ability, subject to limitations imposed by Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933 and other applicable laws and regulations, to raise money from the sale of common stock of the public companies in which it has ownership positions. In addition to the foregoing, the Company does not expect any material impact on its development timelines, revenue levels and its liquidity due to the worldwide spread of COVID-19. However, the Company is continuing to assess the impact the spread of COVID-19 may have on its operations.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments necessary for the fair statement of the balances and results for the periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the Company’s annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted. These condensed consolidated financial statement results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full fiscal year or any future period.

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures have been prepared with the presumption that users of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have read or have access to the audited financial statements for the preceding fiscal year for each of Avenue, Checkpoint and Mustang. Accordingly, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Form 10-K, which was filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 31, 2021, from which the Company derived the balance sheet data at December 31, 2020, as well as Checkpoint’s Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 12, 2021, Mustang’s Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 24, 2021, and Avenue’s Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 31, 2021.

The Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company’s subsidiaries. For consolidated entities where the Company owns less than 100% of the subsidiary, the Company records net loss attributable to non-controlling interests in its consolidated statements of operations equal to the percentage of the economic or ownership interest retained in such entities by the respective non-controlling parties. The Company also consolidates subsidiaries in which it owns less than 50% of the subsidiary but maintains voting control. The Company continually assesses whether changes to existing relationships or future transactions may result in the consolidation or deconsolidation of partner companies.

The preparation of the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period.

Use of Estimates

The Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include certain amounts that are based on management’s best estimates and judgments. The Company’s significant estimates include, but are not limited to, useful lives assigned to long-lived assets, fair value of stock options and warrants, stock-based compensation, common stock issued to acquire licenses, investments, accrued expenses, provisions for income taxes, and contingencies. Due to the uncertainty inherent in such estimates, actual results may differ from these estimates.

Significant Accounting Policies

There have been no material changes in the Company’s significant accounting policies to those previously disclosed in the 2020 Annual Report, other than the accounting for partner company convertible preferred shares and sequencing.

Partner Company Convertible Preferred Shares

The Journey 8% Cumulative Convertible Class A Preferred Stock (“Journey Preferred Stock”) includes settlement features that result in liability classification. The initial carrying value of the Journey Preferred Stock is accreted to the expected settlement value, a fixed monetary amount to be settled by issuing a variable number of Journey common shares. The discount to the settlement value is accreted to interest expense using the effective interest method.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Sequencing

On March 31, 2021, the Company adopted a sequencing policy under accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815-40-35 Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”) whereby in the event that reclassification of contracts from equity to assets or liabilities is necessary pursuant to ASC 815 due to the Company’s inability to demonstrate it has sufficient authorized shares as a result of certain securities convertible or exchangeable for a potentially indeterminable number of shares, shares will be allocated on the basis of the earliest issuance date of potentially dilutive instruments, with the earliest grants receiving the first allocation of shares. Pursuant to ASC 815, grants or issuances of securities or options to the Company’s non-employees, employees or directors are not subject to the sequencing policy.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASU 2019-12”), which is intended to simplify various aspects related to accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and also clarifies and amends existing guidance to improve consistent application. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. On January 1, 2021, the Company’s adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on its financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2020-06, “Debt-Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity,” which simplifies accounting for convertible instruments by removing major separation models required under current GAAP. The ASU removes certain settlement conditions that are required for equity contracts to qualify for the derivative scope exception and it also simplifies the diluted earnings per share calculation in certain areas. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2023, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption will be permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses”. The ASU sets forth a “current expected credit loss” (CECL) model which requires the Company to measure all expected credit losses for financial instruments held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable supportable forecasts. This replaces the existing incurred loss model and is applicable to the measurement of credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost and applies to some off-balance sheet credit exposures. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. Recently, the FASB issued the final ASU to delay adoption for smaller reporting companies to calendar year 2023. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

3. Collaboration and Stock Purchase Agreements

Cyprium

Agreement with Sentynl Therapeutics, Inc. (“Sentynl”)

On February 24, 2021, Cyprium entered into an asset purchase agreement with Sentynl. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Sentynl paid Cyprium an upfront fee of $8.0 million specifically earmarked to complete the CUTX-101 development program for the treatment of Menkes disease, through the filing of Cyprium’s New Drug Application (“NDA”) with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). As further compensation, Cyprium will receive an additional $12.0 million to be paid (i) $3.0 million upon NDA acceptance by the FDA and (ii) $9.0 million upon FDA approval of the NDA and transfer of CUTX-101 to Sentynl. The Company will recognize revenue associated with these future milestones based upon achievement. At March 31, 2021, none of these future milestones were deemed probable.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Upon the transfer of CUTX-101 to Sentynl, Cyprium is eligible to earn an additional five potential sales milestones totaling $255.0 million in addition to royalties on CUTX-101 net sales ranging from mid-single digits up to the mid-twenties. Cyprium will retain 100% ownership over any FDA priority review voucher that may be issued at NDA approval for CUTX-101.

The Company determined that this agreement falls within the scope of ASC 606-10-15-3 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC-606”) and ASC 808-10-15-5A Revenue from Collaborative Arrangements (“ASC-808”) and as such the Company will recognize revenue in connection with achievement of two future development milestone payments.

In connection with the $8.0 million upfront payment at March 31, 2021, the Company will recognize revenue using an input method based upon the costs incurred to date to the total estimated costs to complete the development activities. Accordingly, the Company will recognize revenue over the period in which the development activities are expected to occur. For the three month period ending March 31, 2021, the company recognized revenue of $0.8 million. No revenue was recognized in connection with this agreement in 2020.

Avenue

Agreement with InvaGen

On November 12, 2018, Avenue entered into a Stock Purchase and Merger Agreement (the “Avenue SPMA”) with InvaGen Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“InvaGen”), and Madison Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the “Merger Sub”), under which Avenue would be sold to InvaGen in a two-stage transaction. The first stage of the strategic transaction between InvaGen and Avenue closed in February 2019. InvaGen acquired approximately 5.8 million shares of Avenue’s common stock at $6.00 per share for total gross consideration of $35.0 million, representing a 33.3% stake in Avenue’s capital stock on a fully diluted basis (the “Stock Purchase Transaction”). At the second stage closing, InvaGen would acquire the remaining shares of Avenue’s common stock, for $180 million, pursuant to a reverse triangular merger (the “Merger Transaction’).

Consummation of the Merger Transaction is conditioned upon, among other things, U.S. Federal Drug Administration (“FDA”) approval of IV Tramadol, its labeling and scheduling, and the absence of certain other restrictions in effect with respect to IV Tramadol. Pursuant to the Avenue SPMA, if FDA approval of IV Tramadol was not obtained on or before April 30, 2021, InvaGen would not be subject to the mandatory closing obligations set forth in the Avenue SPMA with respect to the Merger Transaction. As of the date of this report, Avenue has not received approval from the FDA for IV Tramadol. As a result, InvaGen is no longer subject to the mandatory closing obligations under the Avenue SPMA, but retains an option to complete the Merger Transaction until October 31, 2021, and also retains the option to terminate the Avenue SPMA.

In the event that InvaGen does not exercise its right to terminate the Avenue SPMA, certain restrictions relating to Avenue’s ability to raise capital and explore strategic alternatives, among other things, could exist through October 31, 2021, the time at which Avenue can choose to terminate the Avenue SPMA. In the event of termination of the Avenue SPMA, InvaGen will retain certain other rights pursuant to the Stockholder’s Agreement entered into on November 12, 2018 between Avenue and InvaGen. These rights exist as long as InvaGen maintains at least 75% of the common shares acquired in the Stock Purchase Transaction, and include, among other things, the right to restrict Avenue from certain equity issuances and changes to Avenue’s capital stock without obtaining InvaGen’s prior written consent.

Subject to the terms and conditions described in the Avenue SPMA, InvaGen may also (in its sole discretion) provide interim financing to Avenue in an amount of up to $7.0 million during the time period between the Stock Purchase Transaction (which occurred on February 8, 2019) and the Merger Transaction. Any amounts drawn on the interim financing would be deducted from the aggregate consideration payable to the Avenue stockholders by virtue of the Merger Transaction. There have been no amounts drawn upon this interim financing as of March 31, 2021.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Over the past several months, Avenue has communicated with InvaGen relating to InvaGen’s assertions that Material Adverse Effects (as defined in the Avenue SPMA) have occurred due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on potential commercialization and projected sales of IV Tramadol. Additionally, in connection with the resubmission of Avenue’s NDA in February 2021, InvaGen communicated to Avenue that it believes the proposed label for IV Tramadol would also constitute a Material Adverse Effect (as defined in the Avenue SPMA) on the purported basis that the proposed label under certain circumstances would make the product commercially unviable. InvaGen has communicated to Avenue its desire to consider all options on the proposed merger, including the option to not consummate the merger. Since Avenue did not receive FDA approval for IV Tramadol by April 30, 2021, these assertions have no impact as to whether InvaGen is obligated to close the Avenue SPMA, because, as discussed above, InvaGen no longer has such an obligation. As a result, the possible timing and likelihood of the completion of the merger are uncertain.There can be no assurance that the Merger Transaction will be completed on the expected terms, anticipated schedule, or at all. It is also possible InvaGen could attempt to pursue monetary claims against Avenue and/or Fortress.

Avenue is not yet generating revenue, has incurred substantial operating losses since its inception and expects to continue to incur significant operating losses for the foreseeable future as it executes on its product development plan and may never become profitable. As of March 31, 2021, Avenue had an accumulated deficit of $74.3 million.

On October 12, 2020, Avenue announced that it had received a Complete Response Letter (“CRL”) from the FDA regarding the Company’s NDA for IV Tramadol. The CRL cited deficiencies related to the terminal sterilization validation and stated that IV Tramadol, intended to treat patients in acute pain who require an opioid, is not safe for the intended patient population. On February 12, 2021, Avenue resubmitted its NDA to the FDA for IV Tramadol. The NDA resubmission follows the receipt of official minutes from a Type A meeting with the FDA. The resubmission included revised language relating to the proposed product label and a report relating to terminal sterilization validation. The FDA assigned a Prescription Drug User Fee Act goal date of April 12, 2021 and informed Avenue that it had not yet completed its review of the NDA resubmission. Avenue’s ability to potentially commercialize IV Tramadol, and the timing of any potential commercialization, are dependent on the FDA’s review of Avenue’s resubmission of its NDA for IV Tramadol, whether or not the FDA ultimately approves IV Tramadol, and potentially on whether or not Avenue procures additional capital.

As of March 31, 2021, Avenue had cash and cash equivalents of $1.8 million. In the event that IV Tramadol is approved by the FDA, this triggers an obligation by Avenue to make $5.0 million in contractual milestone payments, for which Avenue currently does not have sufficient funding. In the event that IV Tramadol is not approved by the FDA, Avenue believes that its cash and cash equivalents should be sufficient to fund its operating expenses only through the end of the second quarter of 2021. Avenue will need to secure additional funds through equity or debt offerings, or other potential sources. Avenue cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. These factors individually and collectively raise substantial doubt about Avenue’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year from the date of this report.

In light of the foregoing, it may be necessary at some point for Avenue to seek protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, which could have a material adverse impact on Avenue’s business, financial condition, operations and could place its shareholders at significant risk of losing all of their investment. In any such Chapter 11 proceeding, Avenue may seek to restructure its obligations or commence an orderly wind-down of its operations and sale of its assets, in either event, holders of equity interests could receive or retain little or no recovery. We also note that the process of exploring refinancing or restructuring alternatives, including those under Chapter 11, may be disruptive to Avenue’s business and operations.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

4. Property and Equipment

Fortress’ property and equipment consisted of the following:


	Useful Life		March 31,		December 31,
($ in thousands)	(Years)		2021		2020

	(Unaudited)
Computer equipment		3	$	663	$	663
Furniture and fixtures		5		1,211		1,199
Machinery & equipment		5		5,748		5,748
Leasehold improvements		2-15		10,580		10,580
Construction in progress ¹		N/A		1,458		499
Total property and equipment				19,660		18,689
Less: Accumulated depreciation				(7,369)		(6,766)
Property and equipment, net			$	12,291	$	11,923

Note 1:

Relates to the Mustang cell processing facility.

Fortress' depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020 was approximately $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively, and was recorded in both research and development expense and general and administrative expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.

5. Fair Value Measurements

Certain of the Company’s financial instruments are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis but are recorded at amounts that approximate their fair value due to their liquid or short-term nature, such as accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities.

Fair Value of Caelum

As of March 31, 2021, the Company valued its investment in Caelum in accordance with ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, and estimated the fair value to be $23.5 million based on a per share value of $3.25. As of March 31, 2021, the following inputs were utilized to derive the value: risk free rate of return of 0.07%, volatility of 70% and a discount for lack of marketability of 41.3%.

As of December 31, 2020, the Company valued its investment in Caelum in accordance with ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, and estimated the fair value to be $17.6 million based on a per share value of $2.43. As of December 31, 2020, the following inputs were utilized to derive the value: risk free rate of return of 0.36%, volatility of 70% and a discount for lack of marketability of 21.0% to 31.0% based on various scenarios. Further, the Company considered the impact of the acquisition of Alexion by AZ, which if consummated, will shorted the timeframe in which the option will be exercised in accordance with the second A&R DOSPA (see Note 3.)

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Journey Warrant Liability

The fair value of Journey’s Contingently Issuable Warrants in connection with Journey’s preferred offering (see Note 10), was measured using a Monte Carlo simulation valuation methodology. A summary of the weighted average (in aggregate) significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs) used in measuring Journey’s warrant liability that are categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as of March 2021 was as follows:


	March 31, 2021
Risk-free interest rate	0.92	%
Expected dividend yield	—
Expected term in years	1.5
Expected volatility	50	%
Probability of issuance of the warrant	100	%

The following tables classify into the fair value hierarchy of Fortress’ financial instruments, measured at fair value as of March 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020:


	Fair Value Measurement as of March 31, 2021
($ in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Fair value of investment in Caelum	$	—	$	—	$	23,479	$	23,479
Total	$	—	$	—	$	23,479	$	23,479


	Fair Value Measurement as of March 31, 2021
($ in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Liabilities
Warrant liabilities	$	—	$	—	$	362	$	362
Total	$	—	$	—	$	362	$	362


	Fair Value Measurement as of December 31, 2020
($ in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Fair value of investment in Caelum	$	—	$	—	$	17,566	$	17,566
Total	$	—	$	—	$	17,566	$	17,566

The table below provides a roll-forward of the changes in fair value of Level 3 financial instruments as of March 31, 2021:



	Investment in
($ in thousands)	Caelum
Balance at December 31, 2020	$	17,566
Change in fair value of investments		5,913
Balance at March 31, 2021	$	23,479


	Warrants
($ in thousands)	liabilities
Balance at December 31, 2020	$	—
Additions - partner company		362
Balance at March 31, 2021	$	362

As of March 31, 2021, no transfers occurred between Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 instruments.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

6. Licenses Acquired

In accordance with ASC 730-10-25-1, Research and Development, costs incurred in obtaining technology licenses are charged to research and development expense if the technology licensed has not reached technological feasibility and has no alternative future use. The licenses purchased by Fortress and its partner companies require substantial completion of research and development, and regulatory and marketing approval efforts in order to reach technological feasibility. As such, for the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, the purchase price of licenses acquired was classified as research and development-licenses acquired in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations as reflected in the following table:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
($ in thousands)	2021		2020
Partner companies:
Mustang	$	—	$	250
Aevitas		25		—
FBIO Acquisition Corp VIII		101		—
Total	$	126	$	250

Aevitas

For the quarter ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, Aevitas recorded $25,000 and nil, respectively, in connection with its license agreement.

FBIO Acquisition Corp VIII

On November 25, 2020, FBIO Acquisition Corp. VIII entered into a license agreement with Fuji Yakuhin Co., LTD (“Fuji”), a Japanese corporation, for the rights to develop Fuji’s novel selective urate reabsorption inhibitor known as Dotinurad in the United States, United Kingdom, European Union and Canada.

Mustang

For the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, Mustang recorded nil and $0.3 million, respectively, in connection with its license agreement with City of Hope (“COH”). The $0.3 million represented a non-refundable milestone payment in connection with the twelfth patient treated in the Phase 1 clinical study of MB-103 at COH for the three months ended March 31, 2020.

7. Sponsored Research and Clinical Trial Agreements

Aevitas

In 2018, Aevitas entered into a Sponsored Research Agreement (“SRA”) with the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania (“UPenn SRA”), as amended in July 2019, for certain continued research and development activities related to the development of adeno-associated virus (“AAV”) gene therapies in complement-mediated diseases. Also in 2018, Aevitas entered into an SRA with the University of Massachusetts (“UMass SRA”), as amended in January 2020, for certain continued research and development activities related to the development of AAV. For the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, Aevitas recorded the following expense in connection with its sponsored research and clinical trial agreements:


	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
($ in thousands)	2021		2020
UMass SRA	$	248	$	—
UPenn SRA		—		281
Total	$	248	$	281

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Mustang

For the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, Mustang recorded the following expense in research and development for sponsored research and clinical trial agreements:


	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
($ in thousands)	2021		2020
City of Hope National Medical Center	$	—	$	500
IL13Rα2 (MB-101)		514		92
CD123 (MB-102)		205		230
CS1 (MB-104)		175		—
HER2 (MB-103)		123		—
PSCA (MB-105)		50		—
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center - CD20 (MB-106)		671		527
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital - XSCID (MB-107)		104		—
Total	$	1,842	$	1,349

City of Hope Sponsored Research Agreement

In March 2015, in connection with Mustang’s license with COH for the development of chimeric antigen receptor (“CAR”) engineered T cell (“CAR T”) technology, Mustang entered into a Sponsored Research Agreement in which Mustang will fund continued research in the amount of $2.0 million per year, payable in four equal annual installments, through the first quarter of 2020. The research covered under this arrangement is for the IL13Rα2-directed CAR T program (MB-101), the CD123-directed CAR T program (MB-102) and the Spacer technology. For the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, Mustang recorded expense of nil and $0.5 million, respectively, in research and development expense in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.

IL13Rα2 (MB-101) Clinical Research Support Agreements

On February 17, 2017, Mustang entered into a Clinical Research Support Agreement for the IL13Rα2-directed CAR T program (the “IL13Rα2 GBM CRA”) with COH. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement Mustang made an upfront payment of approximately $9,300 and will contribute an additional $0.1 million per patient in connection with the on-going investigator-initiated study. Further, Mustang agreed to fund approximately $0.2 million over three years pertaining to the clinical development of the IL13Rα2-directed CAR T program.

In October 2020, Mustang entered into a Clinical Research Support Agreement with COH for the IL13Rα2-directed CAR T program for adult patients with leptomeningeal glioblastoma, ependymoma or medulloblastoma (the “IL13Rα2 Leptomeningeal CRA”). Pursuant to the terms of the IL13Rα2 Leptomeningeal CRA, Mustang made an upfront payment of approximately $29,000 and will contribute an additional $0.1 million per patient in connection with the on-going investigator-initiated study. Further, the Company agreed to fund approximately $0.2 million annually pertaining to the clinical development of the IL13Rα2-directed CAR T program.

For the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, Mustang recorded approximately $0.5 million and $0.1 million, respectively, in research and development expense in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.

CD123 (MB-102) Clinical Research Support Agreement

On February 17, 2017, Mustang entered into a Clinical Research Support Agreement for the CD123-directed CAR T program. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, Mustang made an upfront payment of approximately $20,000 and will contribute an additional $0.1 million per patient in connection with the on-going investigator-initiated study. Further, Mustang agreed to fund approximately $0.2 million over three years pertaining to the clinical development of the CD123-directed CAR T program. For the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, Mustang recorded approximately $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively, in research and development expense in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

CS1(MB-104) Clinical Research and Support Agreement with COH

In June 2020, Mustang entered into a clinical research and support agreement with COH in connection with an investigator-sponsored study conducted under an Institutional Review Board-approved, investigator-initiated protocol entitled: "Phase I Study to Evaluate Cellular Immunotherapy Using Memory-Enriched T Cells Lentivirally Transduced to Express a CS1-Targeting, Hinge-Optimized, 41BB-Costimulatory Chimeric Antigen Receptor and a Truncated EGFR Following Lymphodepleting Chemotherapy in Adult Patients with CS1+ Multiple Myeloma." The CAR T being studied under this protocol has been designated by Mustang as MB-104. Under the terms of the agreement Mustang paid COH $0.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2020 for costs incurred and will reimburse COH for costs associated with this trial, when incurred, not to exceed $2.4 million. The agreement will expire upon the delivery of the final study report or earlier. Expense of $0.2 million and nil was incurred for the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

HER2 (MB-103) Clinical Research Support Agreement

In September 2020, Mustang entered into a clinical research support agreement with COH in connection with an investigator-sponsored study conducted under an Institutional Review Board-approved, investigator-initiated protocol entitled: “Phase I Study of Cellular Immunotherapy using Memory-Enriched T Cells Lentivirally Transduced to Express a HER2-Specific, Hinge-Optimized, 41BB-Costimulatory Chimeric Receptor and a Truncated CD19 for Patients with Recurrent/Refractory Malignant Glioma.” The CAR T being studied under this protocol has been designated as MB-103. Under the terms of the agreement Mustang paid COH approximately $29,000 upon execution and will reimburse COH for costs associated with this trial not to exceed $3.0 million. The agreement will expire upon the delivery of a final study report or earlier. For the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, Mustang recorded $0.1 million and nil, respectively, in research and development expense in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations pursuant to this agreement.

PSCA (MB-105) Clinical Research Support Agreement

In October 2020, Mustang entered into a clinical research support agreement with COH in connection with an investigator-sponsored study conducted under an Institutional Review Board-approved, investigator-initiated protocol entitled: “A Phase 1b study to evaluate PSCA-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells for patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.” The CAR T being studied under this protocol has been designated as MB-105. Under the terms of the agreement Mustang paid COH $33,000 upon execution and will reimburse COH for costs associated with this trial not to exceed $2.3 million. The agreement will expire upon the delivery of a final study report or earlier. For the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, Mustang recorded $0.1 million and nil, respectively, in research and development expense in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations pursuant to this agreement.

CD20 (MB-106) Clinical Trial Agreement with Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

On July 3, 2017, in conjunction with the CD20 Technology License from Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (“Fred Hutch”), Mustang entered into an investigator-initiated clinical trial agreement (“CD20 CTA”) to provide partial funding for a Phase 1/2 clinical trial at Fred Hutch evaluating the safety and efficacy of the CD20 Technology in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. In connection with the CD20 CTA, Mustang agreed to fund up to $5.3 million of costs associated with the clinical trial, which commenced during the fourth quarter of 2017. In November 2020, the CD20 CTA was amended to include additional funding of approximately $0.8 million for the treatment of five patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. For the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, Mustang recorded $0.7 million and $0.5 million of expense, respectively, related to this agreement in research and development expense in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

XSCID (MB-107) Data Transfer Agreement with St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital

In June 2020, Mustang entered into a Data Transfer Agreement with St. Jude Children’s Research Center (“St. Jude”) under which Mustang will reimburse St. Jude for costs associated with St. Jude’s clinical trial for the treatment of infants with X-linked Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (“XSCID”). Pursuant to the terms of this agreement Mustang paid an upfront fee of $1.1 million on July 1, 2020 and will continue to reimburse St. Jude for costs incurred in connection with this trial. For the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, Mustang recorded $0.1 million and nil, respectively, related to this agreement in research and development expense in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Oncogenuity


	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
($ in thousands)	2021		2020
Columbia	$	188	$	—
Oxford		79		—
McCormick Labs		56		—
Total	$	323	$	—

Columbia Sponsored Research Agreement

Pursuant to the terms of a SRA entered into with the Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York (“Columbia”) in May 2020, to develop novel oligonucleotides for the treatment of genetically driven cancers (the “Columbia SRA”), Oncogenuity will make semi-annual research payments to Columbia semiannually for five years ending in November 2024, such payments not to exceed $4.8 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2021, Oncogenuity recorded expense of $0.2 million and nil, respectively, in research and development in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.

The Regents of the University of California Sponsored Research Agreement

In December 2020, Oncogenuity entered into a SRA with The Regents of the University of California, with Frank McCormick PhD, FRS as principal investigator (“McCormick SRA”). For the three months ended March 31, 2021, Oncogenuity recorded expense of $0.1 million in research and development in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. No expense was recorded in 2020.

The Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford Sponsored Research Agreement

In December, 2020, Oncogenuity entered into a Sponsored Research Agreement with The Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford, (the “Oxford SRA”). For the three months ended March 31, 2021, Oncogenuity recorded expense of $0.1 million in research and development in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. No expense was recorded in 2020.

8. Intangibles, net

The table below provides a summary of the Journey intangible assets as of March 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively:


	Estimated Useful
($ in thousands)	Lives (Years)	March 31, 2021		December 31, 2020
		(Unaudited)
Total Intangible assets – asset purchases	3 to 7	$	19,003	$	18,606
Accumulated amortization			(4,561)		(3,977)
Net intangible assets		$	14,442	$	14,629

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The table below provides a summary for the three months ended March 31, 2021, of Journey’s recognized expense related to its product licenses, which was recorded in costs of goods sold on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations:


	Intangible
($ in thousands)	Assets, Net
Beginning balance at January 1, 2021	$	14,629
Additions:
Exelderm milestone		397
Amortization expense		(584)
Ending balance at March 31, 2021	$	14,442

The future amortization of these intangible assets is as follows:


							Total
($ in thousands)	Ximino®		Exelderm®		Accutane®		Amortization
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2021	$	764	$	417	$	709	$	1,890
Year Ended December 31, 2022		1,019		—		946		1,965
Year Ended December 31, 2023		1,019		—		945		1,964
Year Ended December 31, 2024		1,019		—		946		1,965
Year Ended December 31, 2025		1,019		—		945		1,964
Thereafter		595		—		158		753
Sub-total	$	5,435	$	417	$	4,649	$	10,501
Assets not yet placed in service:
Anti-itch product license acquisition (amortization commencing second half of 2021)		—		—		—		3,941
Total	$	5,435	$	417	$	4,649	$	14,442

9. Debt and Interest

Debt

Total debt consists of the following as of March 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020:


	March 31,		December 31,
($ in thousands)	2021		2020		Interest rate		Maturity
	(Unaudited)
Total notes payable - Oaktree Note	$	60,000	$	60,000	11.00	%	August - 2025
Less: Discount on notes payable		(8,014)		(8,323)
Total notes payable	$	51,986	$	51,677

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Interest Expense

The following table shows the details of interest expense for all debt arrangements during the periods presented. Interest expense includes contractual interest; fees include amortization of the debt discount and amortization of fees associated with loan transaction costs, amortized over the life of the loan:


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2021						2020
($ in thousands)	Interest		Fees		Total		Interest		Fees		Total
IDB Note¹	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	84	$	-	$	84
2017 Subordinated Note Financing²		—		—		—		1,084		312		1,396
2019 Notes³		—		—		—		269		—		269
2018 Venture Notes⁴		—		—		—		433		176		609
LOC Fees		9		—		9		15		—		15
Mustang Horizon Notes⁵		—		—		—		341		259		600
Oaktree Note		1,650		309		1,959		—		—		—
Note Payable⁶		221		—		221		150		—		150
Other		—		—		—		2		—		2
Total Interest Expense and Financing Fee	$	1,880	$	309	$	2,189	$	2,378	$	747	$	3,125

Note 1:

During August 2020, the Company repaid the IDB Note utilizing the cash collateral securing the IDB Note, which was classified as restricted cash on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Note 2: In August 2020, the Company used certain proceeds from the Oaktree Note to pay off the $28.4 million balance previously outstanding under the 2017 Subordinated Note Financing.

Note 3: August 2020, the Company used certain proceeds from the Oaktree Note to pay off the $9.0 million balance previously outstanding under the 2019 Notes.

Note 4: In August 2020, the Company used certain proceeds from the Oaktree Note to pay off the $21.7 million balance previously outstanding under the 2018 Venture Notes.

Note 5: In September 2020, Mustang repaid the amount outstanding under the Horizon Notes in full, which was comprised of $15.0 million face value of the outstanding notes, $0.1 million in accrued and unpaid interest, a $0.8 million final payment fee and prepayment penalties of $0.6 million.

Note 6: Imputed interest expense related to Journey’s agreements for Ximino and Accutane.

Oaktree Note

On August 27, 2020 (the “Closing Date”), Fortress, as borrower, entered into a $60.0 million senior secured credit agreement (the “Agreement”) with Oaktree. The Oaktree Note bears interest at a fixed annual rate of 11.0%, payable quarterly and maturing on the fifth anniversary of the Closing Date, August 27, 2025, the (“Maturity Date”). The Company is required to make quarterly interest-only payments until the Maturity Date, at which point the outstanding principal amount is due. The Company may voluntarily prepay the Oaktree Note at any time subject to a Prepayment Fee as defined in the Terms section. The Company is required to make mandatory prepayments of the Oaktree Note under various circumstances as defined in the Terms section. No amounts paid or prepaid may be reborrowed without Oaktree consent.

Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement on the Closing Date the Company paid Oaktree an upfront commitment fee equal to 3% of the $60.0 million, or $1.8 million. In addition, the Company paid a $35,000 Agency fee to the Agent which was due on the Closing Date and will be due annually, together with fees of $2.5 million, directly to third parties involved in the transaction.

In connection with the Oaktree Note, the Company issued warrants to Oaktree and certain of its affiliates to purchase up to 1,749,450 shares of common stock (see Note 14) with a relative fair value of $4.4 million.

The Company recorded the fees totaling $8.7 million ($1.8 million to Oaktree, $2.5 million of expenses paid to third-parties and $4.4 million representing the relative fair value of the Oaktree Warrants) to debt discount. These costs are being amortized over the term of the Oaktree Note.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Journey Working Capital Line of Credit

On March 31, 2021 (the “Closing Date”), Journey entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with East West Bank (“EWB Loan”) under which Journey may request advances in aggregate not exceeding the lesser of: (i) the Revolving Line of $7.5 million and (ii) a Borrowing Base representing approximately 85% of Journey’s eligible accounts receivable. Advances bear interest on the outstanding daily balance, at a floating rate of 1.0% above the Prime Rate set by EWB. Interest is due and payable on the last day of the month. The EWB Loan matures on March 31, 2024.

Journey paid an origination fee of $56,250 on the Closing Date in connection with the issuance of the EWB Loan. In addition, Journey agreed to pay certain third party fees incurred by EWB, as well as legal fees incurred by Journey in connection with the EWB Loan totaling approximately $0.1 million. As of March 31, 2021 fees totaling approximately $0.1 million were recorded as a deferred asset on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

As of March 31, 2021 Journey had no outstanding advances under the EWB Loan.

10. Partner Company Convertible Preferred Shares

In March 2021, our partner company Journey commenced an offering of Journey 8% Cumulative Convertible Class A Preferred Stock (the “Journey Offering”) in an aggregate minimum amount of $12.5 million and an aggregate maximum amount of $30.0 million, which may be increased if Journey and the placement agent agree to do so. The Journey Offering commenced on March 31, 2021 and, unless extended, will terminate on May 31, 2021.

Although the Journey 8% Cumulative Convertible Class A Preferred Stock (“Journey Preferred A”) is in the form of preferred stock, in substance this instrument is accounted for as a liability on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Dividends on the Journey Preferred A will be paid quarterly in shares of the Company’s common stock based upon a 7.5% discount to the average trading price over the 10-day period preceding the dividend payment date. In addition, if the Journey Preferred A has not been converted into Journey common stock upon a sale of Journey or a financing of Journey in an amount of at least $25.0 million within a year of the closing (extendable by another six months at Journey’s option), then the Journey Preferred A will be exchanged for shares of the Company’s common stock, also based upon a 7.5% discount to the average Company common stock trading price over the 10-day period preceding such exchange. Furthermore, the Company is obligated to file one or more registration statements covering the issuance of shares that result from such dividends/exchange. As consideration for the foregoing Journey will issue to the Company additional shares of Journey common stock, debt securities, or a combination of the foregoing.

National Securities Corporation (“National”) is the exclusive placement agent for the Journey Offering and will receive a 10% fee on gross proceeds raised, plus either warrants to purchase 5% of the Journey common stock into which the Journey Preferred A converts (in the event of a sale of Journey or a qualified financing) or 5% of the Company common stock for which the Journey Preferred A is exchanged (in the event neither a sale of Journey nor a qualified financing occurs), in addition to reimbursement of legal and other expenses.

The Company evaluated the terms of the Journey Offering under ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, and determined the instrument met the criteria to be recorded as a liability. The value at conversion does not vary with the value of Journey’s common shares, so the settlement provision would not be considered a conversion feature. Accordingly, the Company determined a liability classification is appropriate.

On March 31, 2021, Journey completed its first close in connection with the Journey Offering. In connection with the first close, Journey issued an aggregate of 501,480 Journey Preferred A shares at a price of $25.00 per share, for gross proceeds of $12.5 million. Following the payment of placement agent fees of $1.2 million, and other expenses of $0.1 million, Journey received $11.2 million of net proceeds. At March 31, 2021 the Company recorded this transaction on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as a liability of $12.5 million of partner company convertible preferred shares, which is the fair value at initial recognition, and $1.3 million of debt discount associated with the share settled debt. The initial carrying value of the Journey Preferred A is accreted to the settlement value. The discount to the settlement value is accreted to interest expense using the effective interest method.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

11. Accrued Liabilities and other Long-Term Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities consisted of the following:


	March 31,			December 31,
($ in thousands)	2021		2020
	(Unaudited)
Accrued expenses:
Professional fees	$	1,592	$	1,236
Salaries, bonus and related benefits		5,983		6,701
Research and development		4,234		5,007
Research and development - manufacturing		—		518
Research and development - license maintenance fees		564		461
Research and development - milestones		600		600
Accrued royalties payable		2,048		2,682
Accrued coupon expense		10,944		10,869
Other		1,846		1,188
Total accrued expenses	$	27,811	$	29,262

Other long-term liabilities:
Deferred rent and long-term lease abandonment charge¹	$	1,903	$	1,949
Partner company note payable, long-term:
Ximino agreement²		3,790		3,622
Isotretinoin agreement³		1,823		2,792
Anti-itch product agreement⁴		—		945
Total other long-term liabilities and partner company note payable, long-term	$	7,516	$	9,308

Note 1:

As of March 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020, the balance consists of deferred charges related to build-out of the New York facility.

Note 2:

As of March 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020, the imputed interest discount was $1.2 million and $1.4 million, respectively, in connection with its acquisition of Ximino in July 2019. As of March 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020, $2.0 million and $2.0 million, respectively, of note payable was classified as short-term.

Note 3:

As of March 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020, the imputed discount balance was $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively. The imputed interest discount was calculated utilizing a 4.00% effective rate, which represents the market rate for an asset-backed three year loan, secured by receivables. As of March 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020, $1.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively, of note payable was classified as short-term.

Note 4: As of March 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020, the imputed discount balance was approximately $37,000 and $0.1 million, respectively in connection with its acquisition of an anti-itch product. The imputed interest discount was calculated utilizing a 4.25% effective rate, which represents the market rate for an asset-backed three year loan, secured by receivables. As of March 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020, $2.0 million and $2.8 million, respectively, of note payable was classified as partner company note payable, short-term on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

12. Non-Controlling Interests

Non-controlling interests in consolidated entities are as follows:


			For the three months ended
	As of March 31, 2021		March 31, 2021		As of March 31, 2021
			Net loss attributable to		Non-controlling interests		Non-controlling
($ in thousands)	NCI equity share		non-controlling interests		in consolidated entities		ownership
FBIO Acquisition Corp VIII	$	(99)		(28)	$	(127)	24.0	%
Aevitas		(3,874)		(318)		(4,192)	46.0	%
Avenue ²		1,915		(773)		1,142	77.4	%
Baergic		(1,838)		(12)		(1,850)	39.5	%
Cellvation		(1,313)		(39)		(1,352)	22.1	%
Checkpoint¹		48,130		(4,588)		43,542	80.4	%
Coronado SO		(290)		—		(290)	13.0	%
Cyprium		(1,033)		(478)		(1,511)	29.8	%
Helocyte		(5,210)		(53)		(5,263)	18.3	%
JMC		1,076		35		1,111	12.0	%
Mustang ²		119,322		(10,862)		108,460	81.3	%
Oncogenuity		(507)		(128)		(635)	25.3	%
Tamid		(712)		—		(712)	22.8	%
Total	$	155,567	$	(17,244)	$	138,323


			For the twelve months ended
	As of December 31, 2020		December 31, 2020		As of December 31, 2020
			Net loss attributable to		Non-controlling interests		Non-controlling
($ in thousands)	NCI equity share		non-controlling interests		in consolidated entities		ownership
FBIO Acquisition Corp VIII	$	(7)		(27)	$	(34)	10.0	%
Aevitas		(2,370)		(823)		(3,193)	39.0	%
Avenue ²		5,800		(3,974)		1,826	77.4	%
Baergic		(1,662)		(97)		(1,759)	39.5	%
Cellvation		(1,089)		(182)		(1,271)	22.1	%
Checkpoint ¹		41,704		(13,265)		28,439	80.4	%
Coronado SO		(290)		—		(290)	13.0	%
Cyprium		567		(1,478)		(911)	30.5	%
Helocyte		(4,986)		(259)		(5,245)	18.8	%
JMC		138		491		629	7.1	%
Mustang ²		116,060		(36,429)		79,631	80.9	%
Oncogenuity		(82)		(376)		(458)	25.3	%
Tamid		(663)		(40)		(703)	22.8	%
Total	$	153,120	$	(56,459)	$	96,661

Note 1:

Checkpoint is consolidated with Fortress’ operations because Fortress maintains voting control through its ownership of Checkpoint’s Class A Common Shares which provide super-majority voting rights.

Note 2:

Avenue and Mustang are consolidated with Fortress’ operations because Fortress maintains voting control through its ownership of Preferred Class A Shares which provide super-majority voting rights.

13. Net Loss per Common Share

Basic net loss per share is calculated by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period, without consideration for Common Stock equivalents. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of Common Stock and Common Stock equivalents outstanding for the period.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The following shares of potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the computation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding, as the effect of including such securities would be anti-dilutive for the three months ended March 31, 2021:


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2021	2020
Warrants to purchase Common Stock	4,579,954	2,653,234
Options to purchase Common Stock	853,490	1,210,502
Unvested Restricted Stock	16,391,786	14,307,564
Unvested Restricted Stock Units	231,926	487,996
Total	22,057,156	18,659,296

14. Stockholders’ Equity

Stock-based Compensation

The following table summarizes the stock-based compensation expense from stock option, employee stock purchase programs and restricted Common Stock awards and warrants for the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020:


	Three Months Ended March 31,
($ in thousands)	2021		2020
Employee awards	$	1,488	$	1,217
Executive awards of Fortress Companies' stock		345		401
Non-employee awards		22		54
Partner Companies:
Avenue		114		215
Checkpoint		774		639
Mustang		996		805
Other		34		69
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	3,773	$	3,400

For the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, approximately $1.2 million and $0.9 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense was included in research and development expenses in connection with equity grants made to employees and consultants and approximately $2.6 million and $2.5 million, respectively, was included in general and administrative expenses in connection with grants made to employees, members of the board of directors and consultants.

Stock Options

The following table summarizes Fortress stock option activities excluding activity related to Fortress partner companies:


						Weighted average
				Total		remaining
		Weighted average		weighted average		contractual life
	Number of shares	exercise price		intrinsic value		(years)
Options vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2020	1,053,490	$	5.02	$	647,482	2.63
Forfeited	(25,000)		4.88		—	—
Options vested and expected to vest at March 31, 2021	1,028,490	$	5.02	$	807,138	2.40

As of March 31, 2021, Fortress had no unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to options.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units

The following table summarizes Fortress restricted stock awards and restricted stock units activities, excluding activities related to Fortress Companies:


		Weighted
		average grant
	Number of shares	price
Unvested balance at December 31, 2020	15,507,504	$	2.49
Restricted stock granted	2,330,678		3.17
Restricted stock vested	(236,668)		2.75
Restricted stock units vested	(38,583)		3.48
Unvested balance at March 31, 2021	17,562,931	$	2.57

As of March 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company had unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards of approximately $21.8 million and $17.9 million, respectively, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of 3.6 years and 4.2 years, respectively.

Warrants

The following table summarizes Fortress warrant activities, excluding activities related to Fortress Companies:


				Total weighted		Weighted average
				average		remaining
	Number of	Weighted average		intrinsic		contractual life
	shares	exercise price		value		(years)
Outstanding as of December 31, 2020	4,590,621	$	3.17	$	607,848	4.85
Forfeited	(60,000)		1.37		—
Outstanding as of March 31, 2021	4,530,621	$	3.20	$	1,820,564	4.66
Exercisable as of March 31, 2021	4,370,621	$	3.23	$	1,607,964	4.61

In connection with the Oaktree Note (see Note 9), the Company issued warrants to Oaktree and certain of its affiliates to purchase up to 1,749,450 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $3.20 per share (the “Oaktree Warrants”). Oaktree is entitled to additional warrants if at any time prior to the expiration of the Oaktree Warrants in event the Company issues equity, warrants or convertible notes (collectively known as “Security Instruments”) at a price that is less than 95% of the market price of the Company’s Common Stock on the trading day prior to the issuance of the Security Instruments. The Warrants expire on August 27, 2030 and may be net exercised at the holder’s election. The Company also agreed to file a registration statement on Form S-3 to register for resale the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants.

The Company evaluated the accounting treatment of the Oaktree Warrants and determined that the Oaktree warrants met the scope exception of ASC 815-10-15-74(a) Derivatives and Hedging and therefore should be classified in stockholders’ equity. As such the Company used a Black-Scholes model to value the Oaktree Warrants, utilizing the following inputs: term of 10 years, volatility of 86.8%, and risk-free rate of return of 0.74%, yielding a value of $4.8 million. ASC 470-20-25-2 Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options dictates that debt or stock issued with detachable warrants requires the proceeds to be allocated to the two instruments based on their relative fair values. The relative fair value of the warrants was determined to be $4.4 million and was recorded as a component of Stockholders’ Equity in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Eligible employees can purchase the Company’s Common Stock at the end of a predetermined offering period at 85% of the lower of the fair market value at the beginning or end of the offering period. The ESPP is compensatory and results in stock-based compensation expense.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

As of March 31, 2021, 577,301 shares have been purchased and 422,699 shares are available for future sale under the Company’s ESPP. Share-based compensation expense recorded was approximately $34,000 and $18,000, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020.

Capital Raises

Journey 8% Cumulative Convertible Class A Preferred Offering

See Note 10.

At-the-Market Offering

Pursuant to the terms of the Company’s Amended and Restated At Market Issuance Sales Agreement, or Sales Agreement, with B. Riley FBR, Inc. (“B. Riley,” f/k/a MLV & Co. LLC, and FBR Capital Markets & Co.) (the “ATM”), for the three month period ended March 31, 2020, the Company issued approximately 2.3 million shares of common stock at an average price of $2.59 per share for gross proceeds of $6.1 million. In connection with these sales, the Company paid aggregate fees of approximately $0.2 million. No shares were sold under the ATM for the three month period ended March 31, 2021.

Mustang At-the-Market Offering

During the three months ended March 31, 2021, Mustang issued approximately 11.6 million shares of common stock at an average price of $4.17 per share for gross proceeds of $48.4 million under the Mustang ATM. In connection with these sales, Mustang paid aggregate fees of approximately $0.9 million for net proceeds of approximately $47.5 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2020, Mustang issued approximately 1.2 million shares of common stock at an average price of $3.93 per share for gross proceeds of $5.0 million under the Mustang ATM. In connection with these sales, Mustang paid aggregate fees of approximately $0.1 million for net proceeds of approximately $4.9 million.

Pursuant to the Founders Agreement, Mustang issued 325,221 shares of common stock to Fortress at a weighted average price of $4.16 per share for the three months ended March 31, 2021 and recorded 63,688 shares issuable to Fortress for the Mustang ATM offering noted above. During the three months ended March 31, 2020, Mustang issued 31,220 shares of common stock to Fortress at a weighted average price of $4.00 per share in connection with the Mustang ATM.

On October 23, 2020, Mustang filed a shelf registration statement No. 333-249657 on Form S-3 (the “2020 Mustang S-3”), which was declared effective on December 4, 2020. Under the 2020 Mustang S-3, Mustang may sell up to a total of $100 million of its securities. As of March 31, 2021, approximately $37.8 million of the 2020 Mustang S-3 remains available for sales of securities.

Checkpoint At-the-Market Offering

During the three months ended March 31, 2021, Checkpoint sold a total of 7,025,309 shares of common stock under the Checkpoint ATM for aggregate total gross proceeds of approximately $24.6 million at an average selling price of $3.50 per share, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $23.9 million after deducting commissions and other transaction costs.

Pursuant to the Founders Agreement, Checkpoint issued 175,625 shares of common stock to Fortress at a weighted average price of $3.61 per share for the Checkpoint ATM offerings and the Checkpoint Underwritten Offering, both noted above.

At March 31, 2021, approximately $71.3 million of the Checkpoint shelf remains available for sale under the Checkpoint S-3.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

15. Commitments and Contingencies

Indemnification

In accordance with its certificate of incorporation, bylaws and indemnification agreements, the Company has indemnification obligations to its officers and directors for certain events or occurrences, subject to certain limits, while they are serving at the Company’s request in such capacity. The Company has director and officer insurance to address such claims. The Company also provides indemnification of contractual counterparties in certain situtations, including without limitation to clinical sites, service providers and licensors.

In addition, we act, and are likely to continue acting, in as indemnitor of potential losses or liabilities that may be experienced by one or more of our affiliated companies and/or their partners or investors. For instance, under that certain Indemnification Agreement, dated as of November 12, 2018 (the “Indemnification Agreement”), we indemnify InvaGen and its affiliates for losses they may sustain in connection with inaccuracies that may appear in the representations and warranties that Avenue made to InvaGen in the Avenue SPMA, as such representations and warranties were given as of the dates of signing and first closing, and as may be required to be given as of the second stage closing under the Avenue SPMA as well. The maximum amount of indemnification we may have to provide under the Indemnification Agreement is $35.0 million, and such obligation terminates upon the consummation of the Merger Transaction (as defined in the Avenue SPMA). In the event of payment by us of any such indemnification amount, we would be able to recoup such amounts (other than our pro rata share of the indemnification as a shareholder in Avenue) from the Merger Transaction proceeds, but if the Merger Transaction never occurs, we would have no means of recouping such previously-paid indemnification amounts. If we become obligated to pay all or a portion of such indemnification amounts (regardless of whether or not we are partially reimbursed out of the proceeds of the Merger Transaction), our business and the market value of our common stock and/or debt securities may be materially adversely impacted.

Legal Proceedings

In November 2020, a purported securities class action complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, putatively on behalf of all shareholders who purchased or otherwise acquired Fortress securities between December 11, 2019 and October 9, 2020 (the “Class Period”), and who were allegedly damaged in connection therewith. The case is captioned Cushman v. Fortress Biotech, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-05767, and names as defendants the Company and two of our officers. The complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, the Company made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose various facts and circumstances with respect to a New Drug Application filed by Avenue Therapeutics, Inc., our partner company, regarding IV Tramadol, Avenue’s lead product candidate. The complaint alleges violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and seeks damages as well as attorneys’ fees, expert fees and other costs. The action is in the early stages of litigation, and the Company intends to vigorously contest the claims.

On March 31, 2021 Journey executed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Qbrexza APA”) with Dermira, Inc. a subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company (“Dermira”). Pursuant to the terms of the agreement Journey acquired the rights to Qbrexza® (glycoprronium), a prescription cloth towelette to treat primary axillary hyperhidrosis in patients nine years of age or older. Upon closing of the Qbrexza® purchase, Journey became substituted for Dermira as the plaintiff in U.S. patent litigation commenced by Dermira on October 21, 2020 in the U.S. District Court of Delaware (the “Patent Litigation”) against Perrigo Pharma International DAC (“Perrigo”) alleging infringement of certain patents covering Qbrexza® (the “Qbrexza® Patents”), which are included among the proprietary rights to Qbrexza® to be acquired pursuant to the APA. The Patent Litigation was initiated following the submission by Perrigo, in accordance with the procedures set out in the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (the “Hatch-Waxman Act”), of an Abbreviated New Drug Application, or ANDA. The ANDA seeks approval to market a generic version of Qbrexza® prior to the expiration of the Qbrexza® Patents and alleges that the Qbrexza® Patents are invalid. Perrigo is subject to a 30-month stay preventing it from selling a generic version, but that stay is set to expire on March 9, 2023. Trial in the Patent Litigation is scheduled for September 19, 2022. The Company cannot make any predictions about the final outcome of this matter or the timing thereof.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

To our knowledge, there are no other legal proceedings pending against us, other than routine actions and administrative proceedings, and other actions not deemed material are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. In the ordinary course of business, however, the Company may be subject to both insured and uninsured litigation. Suits and claims may be brought against the Company by customers, suppliers, partners and/or third parties (including tort claims for personal injury arising from clinical trials of the Company’s product candidates and property damage) alleging deficiencies in performance, breach of contract, etc., and seeking resulting alleged damages.

16. Related Party Transactions

The Company’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, individually and through certain trusts over which he has voting and dispositive control, beneficially owned approximately 10.8% of the Company’s issued and outstanding Common Stock as of March 31, 2021. The Company’s Executive Vice Chairman, Strategic Development owns approximately 11.6% of the Company’s issued and outstanding Common Stock as of March 31, 2021.

Shared Services Agreement with TG Therapeutics, Inc (“TGTX”)

In July 2015, TGTX and the Company entered into an arrangement to share the cost of certain research and development employees. The Company’s Executive Vice Chairman, Strategic Development, is Executive Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer of TGTX. Under the terms of the Agreement, TGTX will reimburse the Company for the salary and benefit costs associated with these employees based upon actual hours worked on TGTX related projects. In connection with the shared services agreement, the Company invoiced TGTX $0.1 million and $0.1 million, and received payments of $0.1 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Desk Space Agreements with TGTX and OPPM

In connection with the Company’s Desk Space Agreements for the New York, NY office space, for the three ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company had paid $0.7 million and $0.7 million in rent, respectively, and invoiced TGTX and OPPM approximately $0.4 million and $0.4 million and nil and nil respectively, for their prorated share of the rent base. At March 31, 2021, there were no amounts due related to this arrangement from TGTX or OPPM.

As of July 1, 2018, TGTX employees began to occupy desks in the Waltham, MA office under the Desk Share Agreement. TGTX began to pay their share of the rent based on actual percentage of the office space occupied on a month by month basis. For the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company had paid approximately $0.1 million and $0.1 million in rent for the Waltham, MA office, and invoiced TGTX approximately $28,000 and $29,000, respectively.

Avenue Credit Facility Agreement

On June 12, 2020, Avenue, the Company and InvaGen entered into a Facility Agreement (“Avenue Facility Agreement”), under which, beginning on October 1, 2020, Avenue could have borrowed up to $2.0 million collectively from the Company and InvaGen, subject to certain conditions set forth therein. The Company’s commitment amount was $0.8 million, and InvaGen’s was $1.2 million, and a 7% per annum interest rate applied (payable on the last day of each fiscal quarter. The Avenue Facility Agreement expired on April 29, 2021 and went undrawn. As of March 31, 2021, there were no amounts drawn by Avenue on the Avenue Facility Agreement.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Founders Agreement

The Company has entered into Founders Agreements and, in some cases, Exchange Agreements with certain of its subsidiaries as described in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, filed with the SEC on March 31, 2021. The following table summarizes, by partner company, the effective date of the Founders Agreements and PIK dividend or equity fee payable to the Company in accordance with the terms of the Founders Agreements, Exchange Agreements, and the subsidiaries' certificates of incorporation:


		PIK Dividend as
		a % of fully
		diluted
		outstanding		Class of Stock
Fortress Partner Company	Effective Date ¹	capitalization		Issued
Helocyte	March 20, 2015	2.5	%	Common Stock
Avenue	February 17, 2015	0.0	%²	Common Stock
Mustang	March 13, 2015	2.5	%	Common Stock
Checkpoint	March 17, 2015	0.0	%³	Common Stock
Cellvation	October 31, 2016	2.5	%	Common Stock
Baergic	December 17, 2019 ⁴	2.5	%	Common Stock
Cyprium	March 13, 2017	2.5	%	Common Stock
Aevitas	July 28, 2017	2.5	%	Common Stock
Oncogenuity	April 22, 2020 ⁴	2.5	%	Common Stock
FBIO Acquisition Corp. VIII	November 7, 2017 ⁴	0.0	%	Common Stock

Note 1:

Represents the effective date of each subsidiary’s Founders Agreement. Each PIK dividend and equity fee is payable on the annual anniversary of the effective date of the original Founders Agreement or has since been amended to January 1 of each calendar year.

Note 2:

Concurrently with the execution and delivery of the Stock Purchase and Merger Agreement (“Avenue SPMA”) entered into between, Avenue, the Company and InvaGen Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“InvaGen”) (together, the “ SPMA Parties”), the SPMA Parties entered into a waiver agreement (the “Waiver Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company irrevocably waived its right to receive the annual dividend of Avenue’s common shares under the terms of the Class A preferred stock and any fees, payments, reimbursements or other distributions under the management services agreement between the Company and Avenue and the Founders Agreement, for the period from the effective date of the Waiver Agreement until such time as InvaGen beneficially owns less than 75% of the shares of Avenue common stock it acquired under the first closing of the Avenue SPMA. Pursuant to the Waiver Agreement, immediately prior to the closing of the Merger Transaction contemplated under the Avenue SPMA, the Company will convert all of its preferred shares into common shares pursuant to the terms of the certificate of incorporation of Avenue, as amended from time to time.

Note 3:

Instead of a PIK dividend, Checkpoint pays the Company an annual equity fee in shares of Checkpoint’s common stock equal to 2.5% of Checkpoint’s fully diluted outstanding capitalization.

Note 4:

Represents the Trigger Date, the date that the Fortress partner company first acquires, whether by license or otherwise, ownership rights in a product.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Management Services Agreements

The Company has entered in Management Services Agreements (the “MSAs”) with certain of its partner companies as described in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed with the SEC on March 16, 2020. The following table summarizes the effective date of the MSA and the annual consulting fee payable by the partner company to the Company in quarterly installments:


		Annual MSA Fee
Fortress partner company	Effective Date	(Income)/Expense
Helocyte	March 20, 2015	$	500
Avenue ¹	February 17, 2015		—
Mustang	March 13, 2015		500
Checkpoint	March 17, 2015		500
Cellvation	October 31, 2016		500
Baergic	March 9, 2017		500
Cyprium	March 13, 2017		500
Aevitas	July 28, 2017		500
Oncogenuity	February 10, 2017		500
FBIO Acquisition Corp. VIII	November 7, 2017		500
Fortress			(4,500)
Consolidated (Income)/Expense		$	—

Note 1:

Concurrently with the execution and delivery of the Avenue SPMA entered into among, Avenue, the Company and InvaGen Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“InvaGen”) (together, the “SPMA Parties”), the SPMA Parties entered into a waiver agreement (the “Waiver Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company irrevocably waived its right to receive the annual dividend of Avenue’s common shares under the terms of the Class A preferred stock and any fees, payments, reimbursements or other distributions under the management services agreement between the Company and Avenue and the Founders Agreement, for the period from the effective date of the Waiver Agreement until such time as InvaGen beneficially owns less than 75% of the shares of Avenue common stock it acquired under the first closing of the Avenue SPMA. Pursuant to the Waiver Agreement, immediately prior to the closing of the Merger Transaction contemplated under the Avenue SPMA, the Company will convert all of its preferred shares into common shares pursuant to the terms of the certificate of incorporation of Avenue, as amended from time to time. (See Note 3).

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

17. Segment Information

The Company operates in two reportable segments, Dermatology Product Sales and Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Product Development. The accounting policies of the Company’s segments are the same as those described in Note 2. The following tables summarize, for the periods indicated, operating results from continued operations by reportable segment:


			Pharmaceutical
			and
($ in thousands)	Dermatology		Biotechnology
	Products		Product
Three Months Ended March 31, 2021	Sales		Development		Consolidated
Net revenue	$	10,719	$	868	$	11,587
Direct cost of goods		(3,908)		—		(3,908)
Sales and marketing costs		(5,070)		—		(5,070)
Research and development		—		(20,154)		(20,154)
General and administrative		(1,156)		(11,316)		(12,472)
Other expense		(221)		4,172		3,951
Segment income (loss)	$	364		(26,430)	$	(26,066)
Segment assets
Intangible assets, net		14,442		—		14,442
Tangible assets		42,200		334,401		376,601
Total segment assets	$	56,642	$	334,401	$	391,043


			Pharmaceutical
			and
	Dermatology		Biotechnology
($ in thousands)	Products		Product
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020	Sales		Development		Consolidated
Net revenue	$	11,946	$	972	$	12,918
Direct cost of goods		(3,810)		—		(3,810)
Sales and marketing costs		(4,679)		—		(4,679)
Research and development		—		(15,117)		(15,117)
General and administrative		(953)		(9,887)		(10,840)
Other expense		(207)		(2,333)		(2,540)
Segment income (loss)	$	2,297	$	(26,365)	$	(24,068)
Segment assets
Intangible assets, net		7,022		—		7,022
Tangible assets		23,550		198,187		221,737
Total segment assets	$	30,572	$	198,187	$	228,759

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

18. Revenues from Contracts and Significant Customers

Disaggregation of Total Revenue

Product revenue is comprised of Journey’s seven marketed products: Targadox®, Luxamend®, Ceracade®, Exelderm®, Ximino®, Accutane® and Qbrexza®. Substantially all of the product revenue is recorded in the U.S. The Company’s collaboration revenue is from Cyprium’s agreement with Sentynl (see Note 3). The Company’s related party revenue is from Checkpoint’s collaboration with TGTX. The table below summarizes the Company’s revenue for the three months ending March 31, 2021 and 2020:


	Three months ended March 31,
	2021		2020
Revenue
Product revenue, net	$	10,719	$	11,946
Collaboration revenue		800		—
Revenue – related party		68		972
Net revenue	$	11,587	$	12,918

Significant Customers

For the March 31, 2021, none of the Company’s dermatology products customers accounted for more than 10% of its total gross product revenue.

For the three months ended March 31, 2020, two of the Company’s dermatology products customers accounted for more than 10% of its total gross product revenue.

At March 31, 2021, none of the Company’s dermatology products customers accounted for more than 10% of its total accounts receivable balance.

At March 31, 2020, two of the Company’s dermatology products customers accounted for more than 10% of its total accounts balance in the amounts of $5.4 million and $2.5 million.

19. Income taxes

On March 11, 2021, the President of the United States signed the American Rescue Plan Act, also called the COVID-19 Stimulus Package or American Rescue Plan into law. The American Rescue Plan includes many non-tax and tax provisions to help address the continuing pandemic, including extending the Employee Retention Credit to December 31, 2021. The Company will continue to evaluate the impact of the American Rescue Plan on its financial positions, results of operations and cash flows.

The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to US federal and state income taxes. Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of Management, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.

The Company files a consolidated income tax return with subsidiaries for which the Company has an 80% or greater ownership interest. Subsidiaries for which the Company does not have an 80% or more ownership are not included in the Company’s consolidated income tax group and file their own separate income tax return. As a result, certain corporate entities included in these financial statements are not able to combine or offset their taxable income or losses with other entities’ tax attributes.

Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020 is based on the estimated annual effective tax rate.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

20. Subsequent Event

Upon HSR acceptance, which was received on May 13, 2021, Journey paid the upfront fee of $12.5 million to Dermira. In addition, Dermira is eligible to receive up to $144 million in the aggregate upon the achievement of certain milestones. Royalties ranging from the lower teen digits to the upper teen digits will be payable on net sales of Qbrexza® products, of which royalty amounts are subject to 50% diminution in the event of loss of exclusivity due to the introduction of an authorized generic.

Upon closing of the Qbrexza® purchase, Journey became substituted for Dermira as the plaintiff in U.S. patent litigation commenced by Dermira on October 21, 2020 in the U.S. District Court of Delaware (the “Patent Litigation”) against Perrigo Pharma International DAC (“Perrigo”) alleging infringement of certain patents covering Qbrexza® (the “Qbrexza® Patents”), which are included among the proprietary rights to Qbrexza® to be acquired pursuant to the APA. The Patent Litigation was initiated following the submission by Perrigo, in accordance with the procedures set out in the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (the “Hatch-Waxman Act”), of an Abbreviated New Drug Application, or ANDA. The ANDA seeks approval to market a generic version of Qbrexza® prior to the expiration of the Qbrexza® Patents and alleges that the Qbrexza® Patents are invalid. Perrigo is subject to a 30-month stay preventing it from selling a generic version, but that stay is set to expire on March 9, 2023. Trial in the Patent Litigation is scheduled for September 19, 2022. The Company cannot make any predictions about the final outcome of this matter or the timing thereof.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Our condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), including, without limitation, statements regarding our expectations, beliefs, intentions or future strategies that are signified by the words “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “believe,” “may,” “plan”, “seek” or similar language. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to us on the date hereof and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. For such forward-looking statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Our business and financial performance are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially, from those projected in the forward-looking statements. In evaluating our business, you should carefully consider the information set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” herein and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. As used below, the words “we,” “us” and “our” may refer to Fortress Biotech, Inc. individually or together with one or more partner companies, as dictated by context.

Overview

We are a biopharmaceutical company dedicated to acquiring, developing and commercializing pharmaceutical and biotechnology products and product candidates, which we do at the Fortress level, at our majority-owned and majority-controlled subsidiaries and joint ventures, and at entities we founded and in which we maintain significant minority ownership positions. Fortress has a talented and experienced business development team, comprising scientists, doctors, and finance professionals, who identify and evaluate promising products and product candidates for potential acquisition by new or existing partner companies. Through our partner companies, we have executed such arrangements in partnership with some of the world’s foremost universities, research institutes and pharmaceutical companies, including City of Hope National Medical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Columbia University, the University of Pennsylvania, and AstraZeneca plc.

Following the exclusive license or other acquisition of the intellectual property underpinning a product or product candidate, we leverage our business, scientific, regulatory, legal and finance expertise to help our partners achieve their goals. Our partner companies then assess a broad range of strategic arrangements to accelerate and provide additional funding to support research and development, including joint ventures, partnerships, out-licensings, and public and private financings; to date, three partner companies are publicly-traded, and two have consummated strategic partnerships with industry leaders Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and InvaGen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (a subsidiary of Cipla Limited).

Recent Events

Marketed Dermatology Products

●

Our seven dermatology products are marketed by our partner company, Journey Medical Corporation (“Journey” or “JMC”).

●

During the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, JMC’s marketed products generated net revenue of $10.7 million and $11.9 million, respectively.

●

Journey acquired and recently launched its seventh prescription dermatology product, Qbrexza®.

●

On April 1, 2021, Journey entered into an agreement with East West Bank (“EWB”) in which EWB will provide a $7.5 million working capital line of credit.

●

On March 31, 2021, Journey completed its first close in connection with its Cumulative Convertible Class A Preferred Stock Offering. In connection with the first close, Journey issued an aggregate of 501,480 Journey Preferred A shares at a price of $25.00 per share, for net proceeds of $11.2 million after deducting commissions, fees and expenses.

Table of Contents

Late Stage Product Candidates

Intravenous (IV) Tramadol

●

In October 2020, Avenue Therapeutics (“Avenue”) announced that it had received a Complete Response Letter (“CRL”) from the FDA regarding Avenue’s NDA for IV tramadol. The FDA held a Type A meeting with Avenue in November 2020 to discuss the issues outlined in the CRL. On February 12, 2021, Avenue resubmitted its NDA to the FDA for IV tramadol. The NDA resubmission followed the receipt of the official minutes from Avenue’s Type A meeting with the FDA. The NDA resubmission included revised language relating to the proposed product label and a report relating to terminal sterilization validation. On February 26, 2021, Avenue received an acknowledgement letter from the FDA stating that Avenue’s resubmission of its NDA is a complete, class 1 response to the CRL, and a Prescription Drug User Free Act (“PDUFA”) goal date was set for April 12, 2021. On April 13, 2021, Avenue announced that the FDA was still reviewing its NDA for IV Tramadol and had not provided a decision regarding the NDA. As of May 1, 2021, Avenue had not received approval from the FDA for IV Tramadol. Accordingly, under the Avenue SPMA, InvaGen retains an option to consummate the second stage closing until October 31, 2021 (after which Avenue can choose to terminate the Avenue SPMA), and also retains the option to terminate the Avenue SPMA.

●

Also in October 2020, InvaGen Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“InvaGen”) communicated to Avenue that it believes a Material Adverse Event (as defined in the SPMA entered into on November 12, 2018 between Avenue, InvaGen and Madison Pharmaceuticals Inc., a newly formed, wholly owned subsidiary of InvaGen) has occurred due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on potential commercialization and projected sales of IV tramadol. Additionally, in connection with the resubmission of Avenue’s NDA in February 2021, InvaGen communicated to Avenue that it believes the proposed label for IV tramadol would also constitute a Material Adverse Event on the purported basis that the proposed label under certain circumstances would make the product commercially unviable. While Avenue disagrees with InvaGen’s assertions, it is possible InvaGen could attempt to seek to use either or both the foregoing claims as a basis to pursue monetary claims against Avenue and/or Fortress.

●

IV tramadol is currently in development at our partner company, Avenue.

CUTX-101 (Copper Histidinate for Menkes disease)

●

In February 2021, our partner company, Cyprium, and Sentynl Therapeutics (“Sentynl”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Zydus Group, signed a Development and Asset Purchase Agreement for CUTX-101 for the treatment of Menkes disease. Under the terms of the agreement, Cyprium received $8.0 million upfront to fund the development of CUTX-101 and could receive up to $12.0 million in regulatory milestone payments through NDA approval, and is eligible to receive sales milestones plus royalties. Royalties start from mid-single digits, scaling up to 25% on sales exceeding $100.0 million annually. Cyprium will retain 100% ownership over any FDA priority review voucher that may be issued at NDA approval for CUTX-101. Cyprium is responsible for the development of CUTX-101 through approval of the NDA by the FDA, and Sentynl will be responsible for commercialization of CUTX-101, as well as progressing newborn screening activities.

●

We intend to begin the rolling submission of the NDA for CUTX-101 to the FDA in the second half of 2021.

●

CUTX-101 is currently in development at our partner company, Cyprium Therapeutics, Inc.

MB-107/MB-207 (Ex vivo Lentiviral Therapies for X-linked Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (XSCID))

●

In February 2021, we announced encouraging MB-107 and MB-207 clinical updates from our investigator-IND X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (“XSCID”) trials, as well as additional consistent safety and efficacy data. On January 28, 2021, the FDA removed a CMC hold on the MB-107 Phase 2 clinical trial Investigational New Drug (“IND”) application after reviewing a comprehensive CMC package that was submitted in late December 2020. We expect to enroll the first patient in this pivotal multicenter trial in the second quarter of 2021 and we are targeting topline data from the trial in the second half of 2022. We also expect to file an IND in the second quarter of 2021 for our pivotal multicenter Phase 2 clinical trial of MB-207.

●

MB-107 and MB-207 are currently in development at our partner company, Mustang Bio, Inc. (“Mustang Bio”).

Table of Contents

Cosibelimab (anti-PD-L1 antibody (formerly CK-301))

●

Checkpoint’s registration-enabling study in metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (“mCSCC”) is fully enrolled and we are on track to report top-line results by year-end. With a potentially favorable safety profile versus anti-PD-L1 therapy and a plan to commercialize at a substantially lower price, we believe cosibelimab has the potential to be a market disruptive product in the $25 billion and growing PD-(L)1 class.

●

Also, a Phase 3 registration-enabling trial is planned to begin in first-line metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (“NSCLC”) in mid-2021.

●

Cosibelimab is currently in development at our partner company, Checkpoint Therapeutics, Inc. (“Checkpoint”).

CAEL-101 (light chain fibril-reactive monoclonal antibody for AL amyloidosis)

●

Caelum Biosciences, Inc. (“Caelum”) has two on-going Phase 3 studies of CAEL-101 for AL amyloidosis.

●

Caelum formed a collaboration with Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in 2019, which includes an option to acquire Caelum. AstraZeneca announced the execution of a definitive agreement to purchase Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. In event of the closing of such transaction, the timeline for a potential exercise of the option to purchase Caelum will be accelerated to six months following the date of acquisition closing.

●

In May 2021, Caelum and AstraZeneca announced that two abstracts on CAEL-101 were accepted for e-poster presentation at the European Hematology Association 2021 Virtual Congress (“EHA2021”). Both presentations will include new data from the Phase 2 open-label dose escalation study evaluating the safety and tolerability of CAEL-101 in combination with standard-of-care therapy in AL amyloidosis.

●

CAEL-101 is currently in development at Caelum Biosciences, Inc., a company founded by Fortress in 2017 and in which Fortress maintains a minority position.

Early Stage Product Candidates

MB-106 (CD20-targeted CAR T cell therapy)

●

In May 2021, we announced that that the FDA approved Mustang’s IND application to initiate a multicenter, Phase 1/2clinical trial investigating the safety and efficacy of MB-106, a CD20-targeted CAR T therapy for relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (“B-NHL”) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (“CLL”).

●

Also in May 2021, we announced MB-106 data was selected for presentation at EHA2021. In the abstract posted on the EHA2021 website, our partner Fred Hutch reported on twelve patients treated with MB-106 under the new manufacturing process. The 12 patients were treated at dose levels (“DL”) ranging from 3.3x10⁵ to 1x10⁷ CAR T cells/kg, and clinical responses were observed at all DLs with no dose-limiting toxicities. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in three patients (25%): two patients with grade 1 and one patient with grade 2. Only one patient required tocilizumab and dexamethasone, and no immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome of any grade was observed. Overall response rate (“ORR”) was 92% (11/12) with a complete response (“CR”) rate of 58% (7/12). In nine patients with follicular lymphoma, ORR and CR were 89% (8/9) and 67% (6/9), respectively. The patient with CLL had a PET-negative CR and undetectable measurable residual disease in peripheral blood and bone marrow by flow cytometry (10^-4) (uMRD4) on day 28. Among patients who received the highest two dose levels, DL3 (3.3x10⁶ CAR T cells/kg; n=4) and DL4 (1x10⁷ CAR T cells/kg; n=1), CR rate was 100% (5/5). All seven patients who achieved a CR remain in remission at a median follow-up of four months. CAR T expansion was robust, with median peak blood levels of CAR+ T cells of 122 CAR+ cells/μl (range 0.27-2024), corresponding to 19% (range 0.15 - 65%) of all CD3+ cells. Updated data will be presented at EHA2021.

●

MB-106 is currently in development at our partner company, Mustang Bio.

Dotinurad (Urate Transporter (URAT1) Inhibitor)

●

In May 2021, we announced an exclusive license agreement with Fuji Yakuhin Co. Ltd. to develop Dotinurad in North America and Europe. Dotinurad is a potential best-in-class urate transporter (URAT1) inhibitor for gout and possibly other hyperuricemic indications including chronic kidney disease and heart failure. Dotinurad (URECE® tablet) was approved in Japan in 2020 as a once-daily oral therapy for gout and hyperuricemia. Dotinurad was efficacious and well-tolerated in more than 500 Japanese patients treated for up to 58 weeks in Phase 3 clinical trials.

●

Dotinurad is currently in development at our partner company, FBIO Acquisition Corp. VIII.

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates

See Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Results of Operations

General

For the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, we generated $11.6 million and $12.9 million, respectively, of net revenue, of which $10.7 million and $11.9 million, respectively, relates primarily to the sale of Journey branded and generic products and approximately $68,000 and $1.0 million, respectively, relates to Checkpoint’s collaborative agreements with TG Therapeutics Inc. (“TGTX”). Additional collaboration revenue of $0.8 million recognized in the quarter ended March 31, 2021 is a result of Cyprium’s agreement with Sentynl. As of March 31, 2021, we had an accumulated deficit of $491.6 million. While we may in the future generate revenue from a variety of sources, including license fees, milestone payments, research and development payments in connection with strategic partnerships and/or product sales, our and our subsidiaries’ current product candidates are at an early stage of development and may never be successfully developed or commercialized. Accordingly, we expect to continue to incur substantial losses from operations for the foreseeable future, and there can be no assurance that we will ever generate significant revenues.

For the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, we had $3.9 million and $3.8 million, respectively, of costs of goods sold in connection with the sale of Journey’s marketed products. The increase is as a result of the amortization of license fees including the drug user fee related to the expansion of the marketed product portfolio as well as higher royalty fees attributed directly to net sales.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development costs primarily consist of personnel related expenses, including salaries, benefits, travel, and other related expenses, stock-based compensation, payments made to third parties for license and milestone costs related to in-licensed products and technology, payments made to third party contract research organizations for preclinical and clinical studies, investigative sites for clinical trials, consultants, the cost of acquiring and manufacturing clinical trial materials, costs associated with regulatory filings and patents, laboratory costs and other supplies.

For the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, research and development expenses were approximately $20.0 million and $14.9 million, respectively. Additionally, during the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, we expensed approximately $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, in costs related to the acquisition of licenses. Noncash, stock-based compensation expense included in research and development for the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, was $1.2 million and $0.9 million, respectively.

The table below provides a summary of research and development costs associated with the development of our licenses by entity, for the quarter ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, by entity:



	Three Months Ended March 31,				% of total
($ in thousands)	2021		2020		2021		2020
Research & Development
Fortress	$	647	$	678	3	%	5	%
Partner Companies:
Avenue		259		697	1	%	5	%
Checkpoint		4,213		2,635	21	%	18	%
Mustang		11,562		9,251	58	%	62	%
Other¹		3,347		1,606	17	%	10	%
Total Research & Development Expense	$	20,028	$	14,867	100	%	100	%

Note 1:

Includes the following partner companies: Aevitas, Baergic, Cellvation, Cyprium, Helocyte, Oncogenuity and FBIO Acquisition Corp VIII.

Table of Contents

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses consist principally of sales and marketing costs, personnel-related costs, professional fees for legal, consulting, audit and tax services, rent, and other general operating expenses not otherwise included in research and development expenses. For the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, general and administrative expenses were approximately $17.5 million and $15.5 million, respectively. Noncash, stock-based compensation expense included in general and administrative expenses for the three months March 31, 2021 and 2020, was $2.6 million and $2.5 million, respectively.

The table below provides a summary of general and administrative costs for the quarter ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, by entity:



		Three Months Ended March 31,			% of Total
($ in thousands)	2021		2020		2021		2020
Selling, General & Administrative
Fortress	$	5,819	$	5,663	33	%	36	%
Partner Companies:
Avenue		744		577	4	%	4	%
Checkpoint		1,614		1,553	9	%	10	%
JMC¹		6,226		5,689	36	%	37	%
Mustang		2,203		1,769	13	%	11	%
Other²		936		268	5	%	2	%
Total Selling, General & Administrative Expense	$	17,542	$	15,519	100	%	100	%

Note 1:

Includes cost of outsourced sales force for the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020 of $2.9 million and $3.0 million, respectively.

Note 2:

Includes the following partner companies: Aevitas, Baergic, Cellvation, Cyprium, Helocyte, Oncogenuity and FBIO Acquisition Corp VIII.

Comparison of three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020



	Three Months Ended March 31,				Change
($ in thousands)	2021		2020		$		%
Revenue
Product revenue, net	$	10,719	$	11,946	$	(1,227)	(10)	%
Collaboration revenue		800		—		800	100	%
Revenue – related party		68		972		(904)	(93)	%
Net revenue		11,587		12,918		(1,331)	(10)	%

Operating expenses
Cost of goods sold – product revenue		3,908		3,810		98	3	%
Research and development		20,028		14,867		5,161	35	%
Research and development – licenses acquired		126		250		(124)	(50)	%
Selling, general and administrative		17,542		15,519		2,023	13	%
Total operating expenses		41,604		34,446		7,158	21	%
Loss from operations		(30,017)		(21,528)		(8,489)	39	%

Other income (expense)
Interest income		227		627		(400)	(64)	%
Interest expense and financing fee		(2,189)		(3,125)		936	(30)	%
Change in fair value of investments		5,913		—		5,913	100	%
Change in fair value of derivative liability		—		(42)		42	(100)	%
Total other income (expense)		3,951		(2,540)		6,491	(256)	%
Net Loss		(26,066)		(24,068)		(1,998)	8	%

Less: net loss attributable to non-controlling interest		17,244		11,698		5,546	47	%
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(8,822)	$	(12,370)	$	3,548	(29)	%

Table of Contents

Net revenues decreased $1.3 million, or 10%, from the three months ended March 31, 2020 to the three months ended March 31, 2021 primarily due to increased coupon expense costs related to standard insurance deductible resets, as well as a decrease in collaboration revenue between Checkpoint and TGTX. Related party revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2020 included $0.9 million from TGTX for a cosibelimab clinical trial milestone achievement not replicated in the current quarter. Additional collaboration revenue of $0.8 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2021 was a result of Cyprium’s agreement with Sentynl.

Cost of goods sold increased by $0.1 million, or 3%, from the three months ended March 31, 2020 to the three months ended March 31, 2021 due to the increase in the amortization of license fees, including the drug user fee, related to the expansion of Journey’s marketed product portfolio.

Research and development expenses increased $5.2 million or 35% from the three months ended March 31, 2020 to the three months ended March 31, 2021. The following table shows the change in research and development spending by Fortress and its partner companies:


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	March 31,				Change
($ in thousands)	2021		2020		$		%
Research & Development
Stock-based compensation
Fortress	$	304	$	201	$	103	51	%
Partner Companies:
Avenue		41		85		(44)	(52)	%
Checkpoint		161		144		17	12	%
Mustang		672		453		219	48	%
Other¹		3		10		(7)	(75)	%
Sub-total stock-based compensation expense		1,181		893		288	32	%
Other Research & Development
Fortress		343		477		(134)	(28)	%
Partner Companies:
Avenue		218		612		(394)	(64)	%
Checkpoint		4,052		2,491		1,561	63	%
Mustang		10,890		8,798		2,092	24	%
Other¹		3,344		1,596		1,748	110	%
Total Research & Development Expense	$	20,028	$	14,867	$	5,161	35	%

Note 1:

Includes the following partner companies: Aevitas, Baergic, Cellvation, Cyprium, Helocyte, Oncogenuity and FBIO Acquisition Corp VIII.

The increase in stock-based compensation for the quarter ended March 31, 2021 is primarily due to the effect of new equity grants to key employees and non-employees at both Mustang and Fortress.

The increased spending at Checkpoint of $1.6 million is attributable primarily to increased costs related to Checkpoint’s clinical costs related to their product candidates and manufacturing costs. Mustang’s increase in research and development spending of $2.1 million is attributable to increased costs associated with lab supplies, consulting and professional fees, sponsored research and clinical trial agreements, and personnel related expenses. Avenue’s decrease of $0.4 million is primarily due to decreases in expenses associated with NDA related and advisory committee preparation costs as well as personnel costs. The increase in “Other” of $1.7 million is attributable to increased spend in the three months ended March 31, 2021 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2020 for Cyprium, as Cyprium prepares to file for its rolling NDA.

Table of Contents

General and administrative expenses increased $2.0 million, or 13%, from the three months ended March 31, 2020 to the three months ended March 31, 2021. The following table shows the change in general and administrative spending by Fortress and its partner companies:



	Three Months Ended March 31,				Change
($ in thousands)	2021		2020		$		%
Selling, General & Administrative
Stock-based compensation
Fortress	$	1,551	$	1,471	$	80	5	%
Partner Companies:
Avenue		73		130		(57)	(43)	%
Checkpoint		613		495		118	24	%
Mustang		324		352		(28)	(8)	%
Other²		31		59		(28)	(48)	%
Sub-total stock-based compensation expense		2,592		2,507		85	3	%
Other Selling, General & Administrative
Fortress		4,268		4,192		76	2	%
Partner Companies:
Avenue		671		447		224	50	%
Checkpoint		1,001		1,058		(57)	(5)	%
JMC¹		6,226		5,689		537	9	%
Mustang		1,879		1,417		462	33	%
Other²		905		209		696	333	%
Total Selling, General & Administrative Expense	$	17,542	$	15,519	$	2,023	13	%

Note 1:

Includes cost of outsourced sales force for the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020 of $2.9 million and $3.0 million, respectively.

Note 2:

Includes the following partner companies: Aevitas, Baergic, Cellvation, Cyprium, Helocyte, Oncogenuity and FBIO Acquisition Corp VIII.

For the quarter ended March 31, 2021, the increase in general and administrative expenses of $2.0 million, or 13%, is primarily attributable to Journey’s increased sales and marketing costs associated with the expanded product portfolio, as well as Mustang’s increase in professional fees and investor relations. Avenue’s increase is due to legal expenses, partially offset by decreases in personnel costs. The increase in “Other” of $0.7 million is attributed to Cyprium’s increase in personnel-related expenses.

Total other income (expense) increased $6.5 million, or 256%, from expense of $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 to income of $4.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021, primarily due to interest expense and financing fees offset by the change in fair value of the Company’s investment in Caelum of $5.9 million recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2021.

Net loss attributable to common stockholders decreased $3.5 million, or 29%, from a net loss of $12.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 to a net loss of $8.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We will require additional financing to fully develop and prepare regulatory filings and obtain regulatory approvals for our existing and new product candidates, fund operating losses, and, if deemed appropriate, establish or secure through third parties manufacturing for our potential products, and sales and marketing capabilities. We have funded our operations to date primarily through the sale of equity and debt securities. We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents is sufficient to fund operations for at least the next twelve months. Our failure to raise capital as and when needed would have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and our ability to pursue our business strategies. We may seek funds through equity or debt financings, collaborative or other arrangements with corporate sources, sales of stakes in partner companies, the potential acquisition of Avenue, the contingent acquisition of Caelum, or through other sources of financing.

Table of Contents

In addition to the foregoing, based on the Company’s current assessment, the Company does not expect any material impact on its long-term development timeline and its liquidity due to the worldwide spread of the COVID-19 virus. However, the Company is continuing to assess the effect on its operations by monitoring the spread of COVID-19 and the actions implemented to combat the virus throughout the world.

Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2021 and 2020


	Three Months Ended March 31,
($ in thousands)	2021		2020
Statement of cash flows data:
Total cash (used in)/provided by:
Operating activities	$	(21,688)	$	(21,892)
Investing activities		(458)		(1,776)
Financing activities		78,692		22,753
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	56,546	$	(915)

Components of cash flows from publicly-traded partner companies are comprised of:


	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2021
($ in thousands)	Fortress¹		Avenue		Checkpoint		Mustang		Total
Statement of cash flows data:
Total cash (used in)/provided by:
Operating activities	$	(144)	$	(1,307)	$	(4,657)	$	(15,580)	$	(21,688)
Investing activities		—		—		—		(458)		(458)
Financing activities		7,169		—		23,918		47,605		78,692
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	7,024	$	(1,307)	$	19,261	$	31,567	$	56,546


	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2020
($ in thousands)	Fortress¹		Avenue		Checkpoint		Mustang		Total
Statement of cash flows data:
Total cash (used in)/provided by:
Operating activities	$	(6,029)	$	(1,171)	$	(4,540)	$	(10,152)	$	(21,892)
Investing activities		(250)		(1,000)		—		(526)		(1,776)
Financing activities		17,730		—		(56)		5,079		22,753
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	11,451	$	(2,171)	$	(4,596)	$	(5,599)	$	(915)

Note 1:

Includes Fortress and non-public partner companies.

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities decreased $0.2 million from the three months ended March 31, 2020, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2021. The decrease is due to the increase of $8.0 million in deferred revenue related to the Cyprium Sentnyl deal, offset by the $5.9 million increase in the fair value of the investment in Caelum, as well as the $2.8 million increase in net loss.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2020 of $1.8 million, as compared to net cash used in investing activities of $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021 is a $1.3 million change in cash flows from investing activities. The change is primarily due to a $1.3 million decrease in the purchase of research and development licenses, as well as the $0.1 million decrease in cash used in the purchase of property and equipment.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $22.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020, compared to $78.7 million of net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2021, an increase of $56.0 million. During the three

Table of Contents

months ended March 31, 2021, net proceeds from at-the-market offerings for the partner companies was $71.4 million, and net proceeds from partner company convertible preferred shares was $11.2 million, offset by $2.0 million paid in Series A Preferred dividends. During the three months ended March 31, 2020, net proceeds from the issuance of Series A preferred stock was $13.2 million, net proceeds from the Company and partner companies’ at-the-market offerings were $10.8 million, offset by $1.2 million paid in Series A Preferred dividends.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We are not party to any off-balance sheet transactions. We have no guarantees or obligations other than those which arise out of normal business operations.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks

Market risk represents the risk of loss that may result from the change in value of financial instruments due to fluctuations in their market price. Market risk is inherent in all financial instruments. Market risk may be exacerbated in times of trading illiquidity when market participants refrain from transacting in normal quantities and/or at normal bid-offer spreads. Our exposure to market risk is directly related to derivatives, debt and equity linked instruments related to our financing activities.

Our assets and liabilities are denominated in U.S. dollars. Consequently, we have not considered it necessary to use foreign currency contracts or other derivative instruments to manage changes in currency rates. We do not know, nor do we plan to, use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. However, these circumstances might change.

The primary quantifiable market risk associated with our financial instruments is sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Interest rate risk represents the potential loss from adverse changes in market interest rates. We use an interest rate sensitivity simulation to assess our interest rate risk exposure. For purposes of presenting the possible earnings effect of a hypothetical, adverse change in interest rates over the 12-month period from our reporting date, we assume that all interest rate sensitive financial instruments will be impacted by a hypothetical, immediate 100 basis point increase in interest rates as of the beginning of the period. The sensitivity is based upon the hypothetical assumption that all relevant types of interest rates that affect our results would increase instantaneously, simultaneously and to the same degree. We do not believe that our cash and equivalents have significant risk of default or illiquidity.

The sensitivity analyses of the interest rate sensitive financial instruments are hypothetical and should be used with caution. Changes in fair value based on a 1% or 2% variation in an estimate generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the estimate to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, the effect of a variation in a particular estimate on the fair value of financial instruments is calculated independent of changes in any other estimate; in practice, changes in one factor may result in changes in another factor, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities. In addition, the sensitivity analyses do not consider any action that we may take to mitigate the impact of any adverse changes in the key estimates.

Based on our analysis, for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2020, and for the interim period through March 31, 2021, we determined the effect of a 100+1- basis point change in interest rates on the value of our financial instruments and the resultant effect on our net loss to be immaterial.

Table of Contents

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness, as of March 31, 2021, of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in internal control over financial reporting occurred during the most recent quarter with respect to our operations, which materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Table of Contents

Item 1A. Risk factors

Investing in our Common Stock, Series A Preferred Stock or any other type of equity or debt securities (together our “Securities”) involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K including the consolidated financial statements and the related notes, as well as the risks, uncertainties and other information set forth in the reports and other materials filed or furnished by our partners and affiliates Checkpoint, Mustang, and Avenue with the SEC, before deciding to invest in our Securities. If any of the following risks or the risks included in the public filings of Checkpoint, Mustang or Avenue were to materialize, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future growth prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In that event, the market price of our Securities could decline, and you could lose part of or all of your investment in our Securities. In addition, you should be aware that the below stated risks should be read as being applicable to our partners and affiliates such that, if any of the negative outcomes associated with any such risk is experienced by one of our partners or affiliates, the value of Fortress’ holdings in such partner or affiliate (if any) may decline.

Risks Inherent in Drug Development

Most of our or our partner companies’ product candidates are in the early stages of development and may not be successfully developed or commercialized, and the product candidates that do advance into clinical trials may not receive regulatory approval.

Most of our existing product candidates remain in the early stages of development and will require substantial further capital expenditures, development, testing and regulatory approvals prior to commercialization. The development and regulatory approval processes take several years, and it is unlikely that our product candidates, even if successfully developed and approved by the FDA and/or foreign equivalent regulatory bodies, would be commercially available for several years. Only a small percentage of drugs under development successfully obtain regulatory approval and are successfully commercialized. Accordingly, even if we are able to obtain the requisite financing to fund development programs, we cannot be sure that any of our product candidates will be successfully developed or commercialized, which could result in the failure of our business and a loss of your investment.

Pharmaceutical development has inherent risks. Before we may seek regulatory approval for the commercial sale of any of our products, we will be required to demonstrate, through well-controlled clinical trials, that our product candidates are effective and have a favorable benefit-risk profile for their target indications. Success in early clinical trials is not necessarily indicative of success in later stage clinical trials, during which product candidates may fail to demonstrate sufficient safety or efficacy, despite having progressed through initial clinical testing, which may cause significant setbacks. Further, we may need to conduct additional clinical trials that are not currently anticipated. As a result, product candidates that we advance into clinical trials may never receive regulatory approval.

Even if any of our product candidates are approved, regulatory authorities may approve any such product candidates for fewer or more limited indications than we request, may place limitations on our ability to commercialize products at the intended price points, may grant approval contingent on the product’s performance in costly post-marketing clinical trials, or may approve a label that does not include the claims necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of that product candidate. The regulatory authority may also require the label to contain warnings, contraindications, or precautions that limit the commercialization of the product. In addition, the Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”), or foreign equivalent, may schedule one or more of our product candidates under the Controlled Substances Act, or its foreign equivalent, which could impede such product’s commercial viability. Any of these scenarios could impact the commercial prospects for one or more of our current or future product candidates.

The extensive regulation to which our product candidates are subject may be costly and time consuming, cause anticipated delays, and/or prevent the receipt of the required approvals for commercialization.

The research and clinical development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, storage, record-keeping, advertising, promotion, import, export, marketing and distribution of any product candidate, including our product candidates, is subject to extensive regulation by the FDA in the United States and by comparable health authorities in foreign markets. In the United States, we are not permitted to market a product candidate until the FDA approves such product candidate’s Biologics License Application (“BLA”) or New Drug Application (“NDA”). The approval process is uncertain, expensive, often spans many years, and can vary substantially based upon the type, complexity and novelty of the products involved. In addition to significant and expansive clinical testing requirements, our ability to obtain marketing approval for product candidates depends on the results of required non-clinical testing, including the characterization of the manufactured components of our product candidates and validation of our manufacturing processes. The FDA may determine that our manufacturing processes, testing procedures or equipment and facilities are inadequate to support approval. Further, the FDA has

Table of Contents

substantial discretion in the pharmaceutical approval process and may change approval policies or interpretations of regulations at any time, which could delay, limit or preclude a product candidate’s approval.

The FDA and other regulatory agencies may delay, limit or refuse approval of a product candidate for many reasons, including, but not limited to:

●

disagreement with the trial design or implementation of our clinical trials, including proper use of clinical trial methods and methods of data analysis;

●

an inability to establish sufficient data and information to demonstrate that a product candidate is safe and/or effective for an indication;

●

the FDA’s rejection of clinical data from trials conducted by individual investigators or in countries where the standard of care is potentially different from that of the United States;

●

the FDA’s determination that clinical trial results do not meet the statistical significance levels required for approval;

●

a disagreement by the applicable regulator regarding the interpretation of preclinical study or trial data;

●

determination by the FDA that our manufacturing processes or facilities or those of third-party manufacturers with which we or our collaborators contract for clinical supplies or plan to contract for commercial supplies, do not satisfactorily comply with CGMPs; or

●

a change to the FDA’s approval policies or interpretation of regulations rendering our clinical data, product characteristics, or benefit-risk profile insufficient or unfavorable for approval.

Foreign approval procedures vary by country and may, in addition to the aforementioned risks, involve additional product testing, administrative review periods and agreements with pricing authorities. In addition, rapid drug and biological development during the COVID-19 pandemic has raised questions about the safety and efficacy of certain marketed pharmaceuticals and may result in increased cautiousness by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities in reviewing new pharmaceuticals based on safety, efficacy or other regulatory considerations and may result in significant delays in obtaining regulatory approvals. Any delay in obtaining, or inability to obtain, applicable regulatory approvals would prevent us from commercializing our product candidates.

Delays in the commencement of our clinical trials, or suspensions or terminations of such trials, could result in increased costs and/or delay our ability to pursue regulatory approvals.

The commencement or resumption of clinical trials can be delayed for a variety of reasons, including, but not necessarily limited to, delays in:

●

obtaining regulatory approval to commence a clinical trial;

●

identifying, recruiting and training suitable clinical investigators;

●

reaching and maintaining agreements on acceptable terms with prospective clinical research organizations (“CROs”) and trial sites, the terms of which may be subject to extensive negotiation and modification from time to time and may vary significantly among different CROs and trial sites;

●

obtaining sufficient quantities of a product candidate for use in clinical trials;

●

obtaining IRB or ethics committee approval to conduct a clinical trial at a prospective site;

●

developing and validating companion diagnostics on a timely basis, if required;

●

adding new clinical sites once a trial has begun;

Table of Contents

●

the death, disability, departure or other change to the principal investigator or other staff overseeing the clinical trial at a given site;

●

identifying, recruiting and enrolling patients to participate in a clinical trial; or

●

retaining patients who participate in a clinical trial and replacing those who may withdraw due to adverse events from the therapy, insufficient efficacy, fatigue with the clinical trial process, personal issues, or other reasons.

Any delays in the commencement of our clinical trials will delay our ability to pursue regulatory approval for product candidates. In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of a product candidate.

If any of our product candidates causes unacceptable adverse safety events in clinical trials, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval or commercialize such product, preventing us from generating revenue from such products’ sale. Alternatively, even if a product candidate is approved for marketing, future adverse events could lead to the withdrawal of such product from the market.

Suspensions or delays in the completion of clinical testing could result in increased costs and delay or prevent our ability to complete development of that product or generate product revenues.

Once a clinical trial has begun, patient recruitment and enrollment may be slower than we anticipate due to the nature of the clinical trial plan, the proximity of patients to clinical sites, the eligibility criteria for participation in the study or other factors. Clinical trials may also be delayed as a result of ambiguous or negative interim results or difficulties in obtaining sufficient quantities of product manufactured in accordance with regulatory requirements and on a timely basis. Further, a clinical trial may be modified, suspended or terminated by us, an IRB, an ethics committee or a data safety monitoring committee overseeing the clinical trial, any clinical trial site with respect to that site, or the FDA or other regulatory authorities, due to a number of factors, including, but not necessarily limited to:

●

failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with regulatory requirements or our clinical protocols;

●

inspection of the clinical trial operations or clinical trial site by the FDA or other regulatory authorities resulting in the imposition of a clinical hold;

●

stopping rules contained in the protocol;

●

unforeseen safety issues or any determination that the clinical trial presents unacceptable health risks; and

●

lack of adequate funding to continue the clinical trial.

Regulatory requirements and guidance may change, and we may need to amend clinical trial protocols to reflect these changes. Any such change may require us to resubmit clinical trial protocols to IRBs, which may in turn impact a clinical trial’s cost, timing, and likelihood of success. If any clinical trial is delayed, suspended, or terminated, our ability to obtain regulatory approval for that product candidate will be delayed, and the commercial prospects, if any, for the product candidate may suffer. In addition, many of these factors may ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of a product candidate.

If our competitors develop treatments for any of our product candidates’ target indications and those competitor products are approved more quickly, marketed more successfully or demonstrated to be more effective, the commercial opportunity for our product candidates will be reduced or eliminated.

The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are subject to rapid and intense technological change. We face, and will continue to face, competition in the development and marketing of our product candidates from academic institutions, government agencies, research institutions and biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. Furthermore, new developments, including the development of other drug technologies and methods of preventing the incidence of disease, occur in the pharmaceutical industry at a rapid pace. Any of these developments may render one or more of our product candidates obsolete or noncompetitive.

Competitors may seek to develop alternative formulations that do not directly infringe on our in-licensed patent rights. The commercial opportunity for one or more of our product candidates could be significantly harmed if competitors are able to develop alternative formulations outside the scope of our in-licensed patents. Compared to us, many of our potential competitors have substantially greater:

Table of Contents

●

capital resources;

●

development resources, including personnel and technology;

●

clinical trial experience;

●

regulatory experience;

●

expertise in prosecution of intellectual property rights; and

●

manufacturing, distribution and sales and marketing capabilities.

Table of Contents

As a result of these factors, our competitors may obtain regulatory approval for their products more rapidly than we are able to, or may obtain patent protection or other intellectual property or exclusivity rights that limit our ability to develop or commercialize one or more of our product candidates. Our competitors may also develop drugs that are more effective, safe, useful and/or less costly than ours and may be more successful than us in manufacturing and marketing their products. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. We will also face competition from these third parties in establishing clinical trial sites, in patient registration for clinical trials, and in identifying and in-licensing new product candidates.

Negative public opinion and increased regulatory scrutiny of the therapies that underpin many of our product candidates may damage public perception of our product candidates or adversely affect our ability to conduct our business or obtain regulatory approvals for our product candidates.

If any of the technologies underpinning our product candidates, including gene therapy, is claimed to be unsafe, such product candidate may not gain the acceptance of the public or the medical community. The success of our gene therapy platforms in particular depends upon physicians who specialize in treating the diseases targeted by our product candidates prescribing treatments involving our product candidates in lieu of, or in addition to, treatments with which they are already familiar and for which greater clinical data may be available. More restrictive government regulations or negative public opinion would have a negative effect on our business or financial condition and may delay or impair the development and commercialization of our product candidates or demand for any products we may develop. Adverse events in our clinical trials, even if not ultimately attributable to our product candidates, and the resulting publicity, could lead to increased governmental regulation, unfavorable public perception, potential regulatory delays in the testing or approval of our potential product candidates, stricter labeling requirements for those product candidates that do obtain approval and/or a decrease in demand for any such product candidates. Concern about environmental spread of our products, whether real or anticipated, may also hinder the commercialization of our products.

The FDA limits regulatory approval for our product candidates to those specific indications and conditions for which clinical safety and efficacy have been demonstrated.

Any regulatory approval is limited to the indications for use and related treatment of those specific diseases set forth in the approval for which a product is deemed to be safe and effective by the FDA. In addition to the FDA approval required for new formulations, any new indication for an approved product also requires FDA approval. If we are not able to obtain FDA approval for any desired future indications for our products, our ability to effectively market and sell our products may be reduced and our business may be adversely affected.

While physicians may prescribe drugs for uses that are not described in the product’s label or that differ from those tested in clinical studies and approved by the regulatory authorities (“off label uses”), our ability to promote the products is limited to those indications that are specifically approved by the FDA. Such off-label uses are common across medical specialties and may constitute an appropriate treatment for some patients in varied circumstances. Regulatory authorities in the U.S. generally do not regulate the practice of medicine or behavior of physicians in their choice of treatments. Regulatory authorities do, however, restrict communications by pharmaceutical companies regarding the promotion of off-label use. If our promotional activities fail to comply with these regulations or guidelines, we may be subject to compliance or enforcement actions, including Warning Letters, by, these authorities. In addition, our failure to follow FDA laws, regulations and guidelines relating to promotion and advertising may cause the FDA to suspend or withdraw an approved product from the market, request a recall, institute fines, or could result in disgorgement of money, operating restrictions, corrective advertising, injunctions or criminal prosecution, any of which could harm our business.

Table of Contents

Risks Pertaining to the Need for and Impact of Existing and Additional Financing Activities

We have historically financed a significant portion of our growth and operations in part through the assumption of debt. Should an event of default occur under any applicable loan documents, our business would be materially adversely affected. Further, our current credit arrangement with Oaktree Capital restricts our and certain of our partner companies’ abilities to take certain actions.

At December 31, 2020, the total amount of debt outstanding, net of the debt discount was $51.7 million. If we default on our obligations, the holders of our debt may declare the outstanding amounts immediately payable together with accrued interest, and/or take possession of any pledged collateral. If an event of default occurs, we may be unable to cure it within the applicable cure period, if at all. If the maturity of our indebtedness is accelerated, we may not have sufficient funds available for repayment and we may be unable to borrow or obtain sufficient funds to replace the accelerated indebtedness on terms acceptable to us, or at all. In addition, current or future debt obligations may limit our ability to finance future operations, satisfy capital needs, or to engage in, expand or pursue our business activities. Such restrictions may also prevent us from engaging in activities that could be beneficial to our business and our stockholders unless we repay the outstanding debt, which may not be desirable or possible.

On August 27, 2020, we entered into a $60.0 million senior secured credit agreement with Oaktree Fund Administration, LLC and the lenders from time-to-time party thereto (collectively, “Oaktree”). The Oaktree credit agreement contains certain affirmative and negative covenants restricting our and certain of our partner companies’ abilities to take certain actions, especially as pertains indebtedness, liens, investments, affiliate transactions, acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, prepayment of other indebtedness, dividends and other distributions (subject in each case to exceptions). The Oaktree credit agreement also contains financial covenants obligating us to maintain a minimum liquidity amount and a minimum amount of revenue, in both cases subject to exceptions. The breach of any such provisions (even, potentially, in an immaterial manner) could result in an event of default under the Oaktree credit agreement, the announcement and impact of which could have a negative impact on the trading prices of our securities. The restrictions imposed by such provisions may also inhibit our and certain of our partner companies’ ability to enter into certain transactions or arrangements that management otherwise believes would be in our or such partner companies’ best interests, such as dispositions that would result in cash inflows to Fortress and/or our partner companies, or acquisitions or financings that would promote future growth.

We have a history of operating losses that is expected to continue, and we are unable to predict the extent of future losses, whether we will be able to sustain current revenues or whether we will ever achieve or sustain profitability.

We continue to generate operating losses in all periods including losses from continuing operations of approximately $103.0 million and $101.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. At December 31, 2020, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $482.8 million. We expect to make substantial expenditures and incur increasing operating costs and interest expense in the future, and our accumulated deficit will increase significantly as we expand development and clinical trial activities for our product candidates and finance investments in certain of our existing and new partners and affiliates in accordance with our growth strategy. Our losses have had, and are expected to continue to have, an adverse impact on our working capital, total assets and stockholders’ equity.

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with developing pharmaceutical products, we are unable to predict the timing or amount of increased expenses or when or if, we will be able to achieve profitability. Our net losses may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year. We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially if:

●

one or more of our development-stage product candidates is approved for commercial sale and we decide to commercialize such product(s) ourselves, due to the need to establish the necessary commercial infrastructure to launch and commercialize this product candidate without substantial delays, including hiring sales and marketing personnel and contracting with third parties for manufacturing, testing, warehousing, distribution, cash collection and related commercial activities;

●

we are required by the FDA or a foreign regulatory authority to perform studies in addition to those currently expected;

●

there are any delays in completing our clinical trials or the development of any of our product candidates;

●

we execute other collaborative, licensing or similar arrangements, depending on the timing of payments we may make or receive under these arrangements;

●

there are variations in the level of expenses related to our future development programs;

Table of Contents

●

we become involved in any product liability or intellectual property infringement lawsuits; and

●

there are any regulatory developments affecting our competitors’ product candidates.

Our ability to become profitable depends upon our ability to generate revenue. To date, we have not generated any revenue from our development stage products, and we do not know when, or if, we will generate any revenue from such development-stage products. Our ability to generate revenue from such development-stage products depends on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, our ability to:

●

obtain regulatory approval for one or more of our product candidates, or any future product candidate that we may license or acquire in the future;

●

manufacture commercial quantities of one or more of our product candidates or any future product candidate, if approved, at acceptable cost levels; and

●

develop a commercial organization and the supporting infrastructure required to successfully market and sell one or more of our product candidates or any future product candidate, if approved.

Even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our failure to become and remain profitable would depress the value of our company and could impair our ability to raise capital, expand our business, maintain our research and development efforts, diversify our product offerings or even continue our operations. A decline in the value of our company could also cause you to lose all or part of your investment.

To fund our operations and service our debt securities, which may be deemed to include our Series A Preferred Stock, we will be required to generate a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate cash depends on a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control, and any failure to meet our debt obligations would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common stock and/or preferred stock to decline.

Prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, may affect our ability to make payments on our debt. If we do not generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy our debt obligations, we may have to undertake alternative financing plans, such as refinancing or restructuring our debt, selling assets, reducing or delaying capital investments or seeking to raise additional capital. Alternatively, as we have done in the past, we may also elect to refinance certain of our debt, for example, to extend maturities. Our ability to restructure or refinance our debt will depend on the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. If we are unable to access the capital markets, whether because of the condition of those capital markets or our own financial condition or reputation within such capital markets, we may be unable to refinance our debt. In addition, any refinancing of our debt could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants, which could further restrict our business operations. Our inability to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy our debt obligations or to refinance our obligations on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common stock and/or debt securities to decline.

Repayment of our indebtedness is dependent in part on the generation of cash flow by Journey and its ability to make such cash available to us, by dividend, debt repayment or otherwise. Journey may not be able to, or may not be permitted to, make distributions to enable us to make payments in respect of our indebtedness. Each of our subsidiaries, including Journey, is a distinct legal entity and, under certain circumstances, legal and contractual restrictions may limit our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries.

Our ability to continue to reduce our indebtedness will depend upon factors including our future operating performance, our ability to access the capital markets to refinance existing debt and prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. We can provide no assurance of the amount by which we will reduce our debt, if at all. In addition, servicing our debt will result in a reduction in the amount of our cash flow available for other purposes, including operating costs and capital expenditures that could improve our competitive position and results of operations.

Table of Contents

We may need substantial additional funding and may be unable to raise capital when needed, which may force us to delay, curtail or eliminate one or more of our R&D programs, commercialization efforts or planned acquisitions and potentially change our growth strategy.

Our R&D programs will require substantial additional capital for research, preclinical testing and clinical trials, establishing pilot scale and commercial scale manufacturing processes and facilities, and establishing and developing quality control, regulatory, marketing, sales, and administrative capabilities to support these programs. We expect to fund our R&D activities from a combination of cash generated from royalties and milestones from our partners in various past, ongoing, and future collaborations, and through additional equity or debt financings from third parties. These financings could depress the stock prices of our securities. If additional funds are required to support our operations and such funds cannot be obtained on favorable terms, we may not be able to develop products, which will adversely impact our growth strategy.

Our operations have consumed substantial amounts of cash since inception. During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 we incurred R&D expenses of approximately $61.3 million and $75.2 million, respectively. We expect to continue to spend significant amounts on our growth strategy. We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents will enable us to continue to fund operations in the normal course of business for at least the next 12 months from the filing of this 10-K. Until such time, if ever, as we can generate a sufficient amount of product revenue and achieve profitability, however, we expect to seek to finance potential cash needs. Our ability to obtain additional funding when needed, changes to our operating plans, our existing and anticipated working capital needs, the acceleration or modification of our planned R&D activities, expenditures, acquisitions and growth strategy, increased expenses or other events may affect our need for additional capital in the future and require us to seek additional funding sooner or on different terms than anticipated. In addition, if we are unable to raise additional capital when needed, we might have to delay, curtail or eliminate one or more of our R&D programs and commercialization efforts and potentially change our growth strategy. The terms of our existing debt arrangements, including that with Oaktree, have and will continue to inhibit our and our subsidiaries’ abilities to raise capital.

We may be unable to generate returns for our investors if our partner companies and subsidiaries, several of which have limited or no operating history, have no commercialized revenue generating products, or are not yet profitable, cannot obtain additional third-party financing.

As part of our growth strategy, we have made and will likely continue to make substantial financial and operational commitments in our subsidiaries, which often have limited or no operating history, no commercialized revenue generating products, and require additional third-party financing to fund product and services development or acquisitions. Our business depends in large part on the ability of one or more of our subsidiaries and/or partner companies to innovate, in-license, develop or acquire successful biopharmaceutical products and/or acquire companies in increasingly competitive and highly regulated markets. If certain of our subsidiaries and/or partner companies do not successfully obtain additional third-party financing to commercialize products, or are not acquired in change-of-control transactions that result in cash distributions, as applicable, the value of our businesses and our ownership stakes in our partner companies may be materially adversely affected.

Raising additional funds by issuing securities or through licensing or lending arrangements may cause dilution to our existing stockholders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish proprietary rights.

To the extent that we raise additional capital by issuing common stock (or preferred stock that is convertible into common stock), the share ownership of existing stockholders will be diluted. We have also entered into financing arrangements to raise capital for our subsidiaries under which Fortress common stock is or may be issuable to investors in lieu of cash, upon certain conditions being met; in the event such issuances take place, they will also be dilutive of the stakes of existing stockholders. Any future debt financings may involve covenants that restrict our operations, including limitations on our ability to incur liens or additional debt, pay dividends, redeem our stock, make certain financial commitments and engage in certain merger, consolidation or asset sale transactions, among other restrictions. In addition, if we raise additional funds through licensing or sublicensing arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish potentially valuable rights to our product candidates or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us.

Table of Contents

Risks Pertaining to Our Existing Revenue Stream from Journey Medical Corporation

Future revenue based on sales of our dermatology products, especially Qbrexza, Ximino, Targadox, Accutane, and Exelderm, may be lower than expected or lower than in previous periods.

The vast majority of our operating income for the foreseeable future is expected to come from the sale of dermatology products through our partner company Journey Medical Corporation. Any setback that may occur with respect to such products, in particular Qbrexza, Ximino, Targadox, Accutane, and Exelderm, could significantly impair our operating results and/or reduce our revenue and the market prices of our Securities. Setbacks for such products could include, but are not necessarily limited to, problems with shipping, distribution, demand, manufacturing, product safety, marketing, government regulation or reimbursement, licenses and approvals, intellectual property rights, competition with existing or new products, physician or patient acceptance of the products, as well as higher than expected total rebates, returns or recalls.

Also, the majority of Journey’s sales derive from products that are without patent protection and/or are or may become subject to third party generic competition; the introduction of new competitor products, or increased market share of existing competitor products, could have a significant adverse effect on our operating income.

We face challenges as our products face generic competition and/or losses of exclusivity.

Journey’s products do and may compete with well-established products, both branded and generic, with similar or the same indications. We face increased competition from manufacturers of generic pharmaceutical products, who may submit applications to FDA seeking to market generic versions of Journey’s products. In connection with these applications, the generic drug companies may seek to challenge the validity and enforceability of our patents through litigation. When patents covering certain of our products (if applicable) expire or are successfully challenged through litigation or in PTO proceedings, if a generic company launches a competing product “at risk,” or when the regulatory or licensed exclusivity for our products (if applicable) expires or is otherwise lost, we may face generic competition as a result. Generic versions are generally significantly less expensive than branded versions, and, where available, may be required to be utilized before or in preference to the branded version under third-party reimbursement programs, or substituted by pharmacies. Accordingly, when a branded product loses its market exclusivity, it normally faces intense price competition from generic forms of the product. To successfully compete for business with managed care and pharmacy benefits management organizations, we must often demonstrate that our products offer not only medical benefits, but also cost advantages as compared with other forms of care.

Any disruptions to the capabilities, composition, size or existence of Journey’s sales force may have a significant adverse impact on our existing revenue stream. If we are unable to establish and/or maintain sales and marketing capabilities or fail to enter into agreements with third parties to market, distribute and sell products that may be successfully developed in the future, we may be unable to effectively market and sell such products and generate product revenue.

Journey’s sales force has been and is expected to continue to be an important contributor to its commercial success. Any disruptions to Journey’s relationship with such sales force or the third-party contractor through which they are engaged could materially adversely affect Journey’s product sales. Journey may from time-to-time acquire additional products with which its existing sales force has little familiarity (e.g., with respect to indications, product labels, dosages, formulations or delivery mechanisms), and there is no guarantee that Journey’s sales force will have success in marketing such new products in the near-term or ever.

Apart from Journey, we do not currently have the infrastructure for the sales, marketing and distribution of any of our product candidates, and we must build and maintain such infrastructures or make arrangements with third parties to perform these functions in order to commercialize any products that we may successfully develop. The establishment and development of a sales force, either by us or our partners, or the establishment of a contract sales force, to market any products for which we may receive marketing approval is expensive and time-consuming and could delay any such product launch or compromise the successful commercialization of such products. If we are unable to establish and maintain sales and marketing capabilities or any other non-technical capabilities necessary to commercialize any products that may be successfully developed, we will need to contract with third parties to market and sell such products. We may not be able to establish arrangements with third parties on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

Table of Contents

If our products are not included in managed care organizations’ formularies or coverage by other organizations, our products’ utilization and market shares may be negatively impacted, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

In the United States, continued sales and coverage, including formulary inclusion without the need for a prior authorization or step edit therapy, of our products for commercial sale will depend in part on the availability of reimbursement from third-party payors, including government health administrative authorities, managed care providers, private health insurers and other organizations. Third-party payors are increasingly examining the medical necessity and cost-effectiveness of medical products and services, in addition to their safety and efficacy, and, accordingly, significant uncertainty exists as to the reimbursement status of newly approved therapeutics. Adequate third party reimbursement may not be available for our products to enable us to realize an appropriate return on our investment of our currently marketed products or those which we may acquire or develop in the future.

Managed care organizations and other third-party payors try to negotiate the pricing of medical services and products to control their costs. Managed care organizations and pharmacy benefit managers typically develop formularies to reduce their cost for medications. Formularies are based on the prices and therapeutic benefits of available products. Due to their lower costs, generic products are often favored. The breadth of the products covered by formularies varies considerably from one managed care organization to another, and many formularies include alternative and competitive products for treatment of particular medical conditions. Failure to be included in such formularies or to achieve favorable formulary status may negatively impact the utilization and market share of our products. If our products are not included within an adequate number of formularies or adequate reimbursement levels are not provided, or if those policies increasingly favor generic products, this could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Reimbursement for our product and product candidates may be limited or unavailable in certain market segments, which could make it difficult for us to sell our products profitably.

We have obtained approval for some products, and intend to seek approval for other product candidates, to commercialize in both the United States and in countries and territories outside the United States. If we obtain approval in one or more foreign countries, we will be subject to rules and regulations in those countries relating to such products. In some foreign countries, particularly in the European Union, the pricing of prescription pharmaceuticals and biologics is subject to governmental control. In these countries, pricing negotiations with governmental authorities can take considerable time after the receipt of marketing approval for a product candidate. In addition, market acceptance and sales of our product candidates will depend significantly on the availability of adequate coverage and reimbursement from third-party payors for any of our product candidates and may be affected by existing and future healthcare reform measures.

Government authorities and third-party payors, such as private health insurers and health maintenance organizations, decide which pharmaceuticals they will pay for and establish reimbursement levels. Reimbursement by a third-party payor may depend upon a number of factors, including the third-party payor’s determination regarding whether a product is:

●

a covered benefit under its health plan;

●

safe, effective and medically necessary;

●

appropriate for the specific patient;

●

cost-effective; and

●

experimental or investigational.

Obtaining coverage and reimbursement approval for a product from a government or other third-party payor is a time consuming and costly process that could require that we provide supporting scientific, clinical and cost-effectiveness data for the use of our products to the payor. We may not be able to provide data sufficient to gain acceptance with respect to coverage and reimbursement. If reimbursement of our future products is unavailable or limited in scope or amount, or if pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels, we may be unable to achieve or sustain profitability. Additionally, while we may seek approval of our products in combination with each other, there can be no guarantee that we will obtain coverage and reimbursement for any of our products together, or that such reimbursement will incentivize the use of our products in combination with each other as opposed to in combination with other agents which may be priced more favorably to the medical community.

Table of Contents

Legislative and regulatory changes to the healthcare systems of the United States and certain foreign countries could impact our ability to sell our products profitably. In particular, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) changed the way Medicare covers and pays for pharmaceutical products by revising the payment methodology for many products reimbursed by Medicare, resulting in lower rates of reimbursement for many types of drugs, and added a prescription drug benefit to the Medicare program that involves commercial plans negotiating drug prices for their members. In addition, this law provided authority for limiting the number of drugs that will be covered in any therapeutic class. Cost reduction initiatives and other provisions of this law and future laws could decrease the coverage and price that we will receive for any approved products. While the MMA only applies to drug benefits for Medicare beneficiaries, private payors often follow Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own payment rates. Therefore, any limitations in reimbursement that results from the MMA may result in reductions in payments from private payors.

Since 2003, there have been several other legislative and regulatory changes to the coverage and reimbursement landscape for pharmaceuticals. In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, collectively, the “Affordable Care Act” or “ACA,” was enacted in 2010 and made significant changes to the United States’ healthcare system. The ACA and any revisions or replacements of that Act, any substitute legislation, and other changes in the law or regulatory framework could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Among the provisions of the ACA of importance to our potential product candidates are:

●

an annual, nondeductible fee on any entity that manufactures, or imports specified branded prescription drugs and biological products apportioned among these entities according to their market share in certain government healthcare programs;

●

an increase in the statutory minimum rebates a manufacturer must pay under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program to 23.1% and 13.0% of the average manufacturer price for branded and generic drugs, respectively;

●

expansion of healthcare fraud and abuse laws, including the federal False Claims Act and the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, new government investigative powers and enhanced penalties for non-compliance;

●

a new Medicare Part D coverage gap discount program, in which manufacturers must agree to offer point-of-sale discounts off negotiated prices of applicable brand drugs to eligible beneficiaries during their coverage gap period, as a condition for a manufacturer’s outpatient drugs to be covered under Medicare Part D;

●

extension of a manufacturer’s Medicaid rebate liability to covered drugs dispensed to individuals who are enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations;

●

expansion of eligibility criteria for Medicaid programs by, among other things, allowing states to offer Medicaid coverage to additional individuals and by adding new mandatory eligibility categories for certain individuals with income at or below 138% of the federal poverty level, thereby potentially increasing a manufacturer’s Medicaid rebate liability;

●

expansion of the entities eligible for discounts under the 340B Drug Pricing Program;

●

new requirements under the federal Open Payments program and its implementing regulations;

●

a new requirement to annually report drug samples that manufacturers and distributors provide to physicians;

●

a new regulatory pathway for the approval of biosimilar biological products, all of which will impact existing government healthcare programs and will result in the development of new programs; and

●

a new Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute to oversee, identify priorities in, and conduct comparative clinical effectiveness research, along with funding for such research.

The Supreme Court upheld the ACA in the main challenge to the constitutionality of the law in 2012. Specifically, the Supreme Court held that the individual mandate and corresponding penalty was constitutional because it would be considered a tax by the federal government. The Supreme Court also upheld federal subsidies for purchasers of insurance through federally facilitated exchanges in a decision released in June 2015.

Table of Contents

At the end of 2017, Congress passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which repealed the penalty for individuals who fail to maintain minimum essential health coverage as required by the ACA. Following this legislation, Texas and 19 other states filed a lawsuit alleging that the ACA is unconstitutional as the individual mandate was repealed, undermining the legal basis for the Supreme Court’s prior decision. On December 14, 2018, a Texas federal district court judge issued a ruling declaring that the ACA in its entirety is unconstitutional. Upon appeal, the Fifth Circuit upheld the district court’s ruling that the individual mandate is unconstitutional. However, the Fifth Circuit remanded the case back to the district court to conduct a more thorough assessment of the constitutionality of the entire ACA despite the individual mandate being unconstitutional. The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case on appeal from the Fifth Circuit on March 2, 2020 and held oral arguments on November 10, 2020. While this lawsuit has no immediate legal effect on the ACA and its provisions, this lawsuit is ongoing and the outcome may have a significant impact on our business.

The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, the “BBA,” which set government spending levels for Fiscal Years 2018 and 2019, revised certain provisions of the ACA. Specifically, beginning in 2019, the BBA increased manufacturer point-of-sale discounts off negotiated prices of applicable brand drugs in the Medicare Part D coverage gap from 50% to 70%, ultimately increasing the liability for brand drug manufacturers. Further, this mandatory manufacturer discount applied to biosimilars beginning in 2019.

The 116th Congress explored legislation intended to address the cost of prescription drugs. Notably, the major committees of jurisdiction in the Senate (Finance Committee, Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, and Judiciary Committee), marked up legislation intended to address various elements of the prescription drug supply chain. Proposals include a significant overhaul of the Medicare Part D benefit design, addressing patent “loopholes”, and efforts to cap the increase in drug prices. The House Energy and Commerce Committee approved drug-related legislation intended to increase transparency of drug prices and also curb anti-competitive behavior in the pharmaceutical supply chain. In addition, the House Ways & Means Committee approved legislation intended to improve drug price transparency, including for drug manufacturers to justify certain price increases. The 117^th Congress convened on January 3, 2021 and could reintroduce many of the bills targeting drug prices. While we cannot predict what proposals may ultimately become law, the elements under consideration could significantly change the landscape in which the pharmaceutical market operates.

The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) advanced the Lower Health Care Costs Act of 2019. Among other things, the bill is intended to reduce costs in the United States health sector. The bill revises certain requirements to expedite the approval of generics and biosimilars. It also limits prices that pharmacy benefit managers may charge health insurers or enrollees for prescription drugs. Although this bill still needs to pass the full Senate and House of Representatives, it is worth noting the wide-ranging effects it could have on the health care sector.

On December 12, 2019, the House of Representatives passed broad legislation (H.R. 3, the Elijah E. Cummings Lower Drug Costs Now Act) that would, among other provisions, require HHS to negotiate drug prices and impose price caps and restructure the Medicare Part D benefit, imposing more financial responsibility on certain drug manufacturers. Failure by a manufacturer to reach an agreement with HHS on the negotiated price could result in significant penalties for prescription drug manufacturers. In addition, S. 2543, the Prescription Drug Pricing Reduction Act would also, among other provisions, restructure the Medicare Part D benefit, but it would not authorize direct negotiation by the federal government. While we cannot predict what proposals may ultimately become law, the elements under consideration could significantly change the landscape in which the pharmaceutical market operates.

The Trump Administration took several regulatory steps to redirect ACA implementation. The HHS finalized a Medicare hospital payment reduction for Part B drugs acquired through the 340B Drug Pricing Program.

Table of Contents

Under the Trump Administration, HHS finalized several proposals aimed at lowering drug prices for Medicare beneficiaries and increasing price transparency. For example, the Trump Administration issued an interim final rule on November 27, 2020 implementing a “Most Favored Nation” payment model for Part B drugs that applies international reference pricing to determine reimbursement for certain drugs paid by Medicare Part B. The interim final rule was enjoined by federal courts prior to its implementation date of January 1, 2021, and the lawsuit is ongoing. In addition, HHS, in conjunction with the FDA, finalized four pharmaceutical importation pathways in September 2020: (1) regulations establishing importation of pharmaceuticals from Canada by wholesalers and pharmacists; (2) FDA guidance permitting manufacturers to import their own pharmaceuticals that were originally intended for marketing in other countries; (3) a request for proposals from private sector entities to import prescription drugs for personal use under existing statutory authority; and (4) a request for proposals from private sector entities to reimport insulin under existing statutory authority. Further, on November 11, 2020, the Trump Administration issued a final rule that changes the permissible structure of drug rebates and discounts between drug manufacturers and third-party payors (including pharmacy benefit managers that negotiate drug prices on behalf of such third-party payors). This final rule, often referred to as the “Rebate Rule,” could have significant direct and indirect impacts on drug pricing in both government and commercial markets. With respect to price transparency, the Trump Administration promulgated regulations that require hospitals and third-party payors to disclose prices of items and services, which may impact negotiated rates in the commercial market.

On January 20, 2021, Joe Biden was inaugurated as the 46th president of the United States. As a presidential candidate, Mr. Biden indicated support for several policies aimed at lowering drug prices, including government price negotiation, drug importation, international reference pricing, and price increase controls. The Biden Administration may continue, modify, or repeal many of the drug pricing policies proposed and finalized by the Trump Administration. While we cannot predict which policies the Biden Administration may support and enforce, the policies finalized in the months prior to the beginning of Mr. Biden’s term, if continued, could significantly change the landscape in which the pharmaceutical market operates and significantly impact our ability to effectively market and sell our products.

There likely will continue to be legislative and regulatory proposals at the federal and state levels directed at broadening the availability of healthcare and containing or lowering the cost of healthcare products and services. We cannot predict the initiatives that may be adopted in the future. The continuing efforts of the government, insurance companies, managed care organizations and other payors of healthcare services to contain or reduce costs of healthcare may adversely affect:

●

the demand for any products for which we may obtain regulatory approval;

●

our ability to set a price that we believe is fair for our products;

●

our ability to generate revenues and achieve or maintain profitability;

●

the level of taxes that we are required to pay; and

●

the availability of capital.

In addition, governments may impose price controls, which may adversely affect our future profitability. In January 2020, President Trump signed into law the U.S.-Mexico-Canada (USMCA) trade deal into law. As enacted, there are no commitments with respect to biological product intellectual property rights or data protection, which may create an unfavorable environment across these three countries.

We expect that the ACA, as well as other healthcare reform measures that may be adopted in the future, may result in more rigorous coverage criteria and additional downward pressure on the payment that we receive for any approved drug. Any reduction in reimbursement from Medicare or other government healthcare programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payors. The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability, or commercialize our drugs.

Legislative and regulatory proposals have been made to expand post-approval requirements and restrict sales and promotional activities for pharmaceutical products. We cannot be sure whether additional legislative changes will be enacted, or whether FDA regulations, guidance or interpretations will be changed, or what the impact of such changes on the marketing approvals, if any, of our product candidate, may be. In addition, increased scrutiny by the U.S. Congress of the FDA’s approval process may significantly delay or prevent marketing approval, as well as subject us to more stringent product labeling and post-marketing conditions and other requirements.

Table of Contents

Risks Pertaining to our Business Strategy, Structure and Organization

We have entered, and will likely in the future enter, into certain collaborations or divestitures which may cause a reduction in our business’ size and scope, market share and opportunities in certain markets, or our ability to compete in certain markets and therapeutic categories. We have also entered into several arrangements under which we have agreed to contingent dispositions of partner companies and/or their assets. The failure to consummate any such transaction may impair the value of such companies and/or assets, and we may not be able to identify or execute alternative arrangements on favorable terms, if at all.

We have entered into several partnerships and/or contingent sales of our assets and subsidiaries, including an equity investment and contingent sale between Avenue and InvaGen, an equity investment and contingent option transaction between Caelum and Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and a development funding and contingent asset purchase between Cyprium and Sentynl Therapeutics, Inc. Each of these transactions has been time-consuming and has diverted management’s attention. As a result of these contingent sales, as with other similar transactions that we may complete, we may experience a reduction in the size or scope of our business, our market share in particular markets, our opportunities with respect to certain markets, products or therapeutic categories or our ability to compete in certain markets and therapeutic categories. For example, in connection with execution of the Stock Purchase and Merger Agreement between Avenue and InvaGen, dated as of November 12, 2018 (the “Avenue SPMA”), we signed a Restrictive Covenant Agreement, which prohibits us from, directly or indirectly, engaging in the business of hospital administered pain management anywhere in the world other than Canada, Central America or South America for a period of five years after the earlier of the termination of the Avenue SPMA or consummation of the Merger Transaction (as defined in the Avenue SPMA).

In addition, in connection with any transaction involving a (contingent or non-contingent) sale of one of our assets or subsidiaries, we may surrender our ability to realize long-term value from such asset or subsidiary, in the form of foregone royalties, milestone payments, sublicensing revenue or otherwise, in exchange for upfront and/or other payments. In the event, for instance, that a product candidate underpinning any such asset or subsidiary is granted FDA approval for commercialization following the execution of documentation governing the sale by us of such asset or subsidiary, the transferee of such asset or subsidiary may realize tremendous value from commercializing such product, which we would have realized for ourselves had we not executed such sale transaction and been able to achieve applicable approvals independently.

Should we seek to enter into collaborations or divestitures with respect to other assets or subsidiaries, we may be unable to consummate such arrangements on satisfactory or commercially reasonable terms within our anticipated timelines. In addition, our ability to identify, enter into and/or consummate collaborations and/or divestitures may be limited by competition we face from other companies in pursuing similar transactions in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. Any collaboration or divestiture we pursue, whether we are able to complete it or not, may be complex, time consuming and expensive, may divert from management’s attention, may have a negative impact on our customer relationships, cause us to incur costs associated with maintaining the business of the targeted collaboration or divestiture during the transaction process and also to incur costs of closing and disposing the affected business or transferring the operations of the business to other facilities. In addition, if such transactions are not completed for any reason, the market price of our common stock may reflect a market assumption that such transactions will occur, and a failure to complete such transactions could result in a negative perception by the market of us generally and a decline in the market price of our common stock.

As a result of certain developments and assertions by its partner, InvaGen, Avenue may not consummate the second closing of its merger.

On November 12, 2018, Avenue entered into a Stock Purchase and Merger Agreement (the “Avenue SPMA”) with InvaGen Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“InvaGen”), and Madison Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the “Merger Sub”), under which Avenue would be sold to InvaGen in a two-stage transaction. The first stage of the strategic transaction between InvaGen and Avenue closed in February 2019. InvaGen acquired approximately 5.8 million shares of Avenue’s common stock at $6.00 per share for total gross consideration of $35.0 million, representing a 33.3% stake in Avenue’s capital stock on a fully diluted basis (the Stock Purchase Transaction”). At the second stage closing, InvaGen would acquire the remaining shares of Avenue’s common stock, for $180 million, pursuant to a reverse triangular merger (the “Merger Transaction’).

Table of Contents

We act, and are likely to continue acting, as guarantor and/or indemnitor of the obligations, actions or inactions of certain of our subsidiaries and affiliated companies. We have also entered into certain arrangements with our subsidiaries and third parties pursuant to which a substantial number of shares of our common stock may be issued. Depending on the terms of such arrangements, we may be contractually obligated to pay substantial amounts to third parties, or issue a substantially dilutive number of shares of our common stock, based on the actions or inactions of our subsidiaries and/or affiliates.

We act, and are likely to continue acting, in as indemnitor of potential losses or liabilities that may be experienced by one or more of our affiliated companies and/or their partners or investors. For instance, under that certain Indemnification Agreement, dated as of November 12, 2018 (the “Indemnification Agreement”), we indemnify InvaGen and its affiliates for losses they may sustain in connection with inaccuracies that may appear in the representations and warranties that Avenue made to InvaGen in the Avenue SPMA, as such representations and warranties were given as of the dates of signing and first closing, and as may be required to be given as of the second stage closing under the Avenue SPMA as well. The maximum amount of indemnification we may have to provide under the Indemnification Agreement is $35.0 million, and such obligation terminates upon the consummation of the Merger Transaction (as defined in the Avenue SPMA). In the event of payment by us of any such indemnification amount, we would be able to recoup such amounts (other than our pro rata share of the indemnification as a shareholder in Avenue) from the Merger Transaction proceeds, but if the Merger Transaction never occurs, we would have no means of recouping such previously-paid indemnification amounts. If we become obligated to pay all or a portion of such indemnification amounts (regardless of whether or not we are partially reimbursed out of the proceeds of the Merger Transaction), our business and the market value of our common stock and/or debt securities may be materially adversely impacted.

Our future growth depends in part on our ability to identify and acquire or in-license products and product candidates, and if we are unable to do so, or to integrate acquired products into our operations, we may have limited growth opportunities.

An important part of our business strategy is to continue to develop a pipeline of product candidates by acquiring or in-licensing products, businesses or technologies. Future in-licenses or acquisitions, however, may entail numerous operational and financial risks, including, but not necessarily limited to:

●

exposure to unknown liabilities;

●

disruption of our business and diversion of our management’s time and attention to develop acquired products or technologies;

●

difficulty or inability to secure financing to fund development activities for such acquired or in-licensed technologies in the current economic environment;

●

incurrence of substantial debt or dilutive issuances of securities to pay for acquisitions;

●

higher than expected acquisition and integration costs;

●

increased amortization expenses;

●

difficulty and cost in combining the operations and personnel of any acquired businesses with our operations and personnel;

●

impairment of relationships with key suppliers or customers of any acquired businesses due to changes in management and ownership; and

●

inability to retain key employees of any acquired businesses.

Table of Contents

We have limited resources to identify and execute the acquisition or in-licensing of third-party products, businesses and technologies and integrate them into our current infrastructure. In particular, we may compete with larger biopharmaceutical companies and other competitors in our efforts to establish new collaborations and in-licensing opportunities. These competitors may have access to greater financial resources than us and/or may have greater expertise in identifying and evaluating new opportunities. Moreover, we may devote resources to potential acquisitions or in-licensing opportunities that are never completed, or we may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of such efforts.

Certain of our officers and directors serve in similar roles at our partners, affiliates, related parties and/or other entities with which we transact business or in which we hold significant minority ownership positions, which could result in conflicts of interests relating to ongoing and future relationships and transactions with these parties.

We share directors and/or officers with certain of our partners, and other entities with which we transact business or in which we hold significant minority ownership positions, and such arrangements could create conflicts of interest in the future, including with respect to the allocation of corporate opportunities. While we believe that we have put in place policies and procedures to identify and mitigate such conflicts, and that any existing agreements that may give rise to such conflicts and any such policies or procedures were negotiated at arm’s length in conformity with fiduciary duties, such conflicts of interest may nonetheless arise. The existence and consequences of such potential conflicts could expose us to lost profits, claims by our investors and creditors, and harm to our results of operations.

Certain of our executives, directors and principal stockholders, whose interests may be adverse to those of our other stockholders, can control our direction and policies.

Certain of our executive officers, directors and stockholders own nearly or more than 10% of our outstanding common stock and, together with their affiliates and related persons, beneficially own a significant percentage of our capital stock. If these stockholders were to choose to act together, they would be able to influence our management and affairs and the outcome of matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election of directors and any sale, merger, consolidation, or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. This concentration of voting power could delay or prevent an acquisition of our company on terms that other stockholders may desire. In addition, this concentration of ownership might adversely affect the market price of our common stock by:

●

delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control of us;

●

impeding a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination involving us; or

●

discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us.

If we acquire, or enter into joint ventures with or obtain a controlling interest in companies in the future, our operating results and the value of our Securities may be adversely affected, thereby diluting stockholder value, disrupting our business and/or diminishing the value of our holdings in our partner companies.

As part of our growth strategy, we might acquire, enter into joint ventures with, or obtain significant ownership stakes in other companies. Acquisitions of, joint ventures with and investments in other companies involve numerous risks, including, but not necessarily limited to:

●

risk of entering new markets in which we have little to no experience;

●

diversion of financial and managerial resources from existing operations;

●

successfully negotiating a proposed acquisition or investment timely and at a price or on terms and conditions favorable to us;

●

the impact of regulatory reviews on a proposed acquisition or investment;

●

the outcome of any legal proceedings that may be instituted with respect to the proposed acquisitions or investment;

●

with respect to an acquisition, difficulties in integrating operations, technologies, services and personnel; and

●

potential inability to maintain relationships with customers of the companies we may acquire or invest in.

Table of Contents

If we fail to properly evaluate potential acquisitions, joint ventures or other transaction opportunities, we might not achieve the anticipated benefits of any such transaction, we might incur higher costs than anticipated, and management resources and attention might be diverted from other necessary or valuable activities.

Risks Pertaining to Reliance on Third Parties

We rely predominantly on third parties to manufacture the majority of our preclinical and clinical pharmaceutical supplies and we expect to continue to rely heavily on such third parties and other contractors to produce commercial supplies of our products. Further, we rely solely on third parties to manufacture Journey’s commercialized products. Such dependence on third-party suppliers could adversely impact our businesses.

We depend heavily on third party manufacturers for product supply. If our contract manufacturers cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to applicable specifications and FDA regulatory requirements, we will not be able to secure and/or maintain FDA approval for those products. Our third-party suppliers will be required to maintain compliance with CGMPs and will be subject to inspections by the FDA and comparable agencies and authorities in other jurisdictions to confirm such compliance. In the event that the FDA or such other authorities determine that our third-party suppliers have not complied with CGMPs or comparable regulations, the relevant clinical trials could be terminated or subjected to a clinical hold until such time as we are able to obtain appropriate replacement material and/or applicable compliance, and commercial product could be unfit for sale, or if distributed, could be recalled from the market. Any delay, interruption or other issues that arise in the manufacture, testing, packaging, labeling, storage, or distribution of our products as a result of a failure of the facilities or operations of our third-party suppliers to comply with regulatory requirements or pass any regulatory agency inspection could significantly impair our ability to develop and commercialize our products and product candidates. In addition, several of our currently commercialized products, sold through our partner company Journey, are produced by a single manufacturer, and, although we closely monitor inventory prophylactically, disruptions to such supply arrangements could adversely affect our ability to meet product demand and therefore diminish revenues.

We also rely on third-party manufacturers to purchase from third-party suppliers the raw materials and equipment necessary to produce product candidates for anticipated clinical trials. There are a small number of suppliers for certain capital equipment and raw materials that are used to manufacture those products. We do not have direct control over the process or timing of the acquisition of these raw materials by our third-party manufacturers. Moreover, we currently do not have any agreements for the commercial production of these raw materials since such agreements are entered into by our third-party manufacturers and their qualified suppliers. Any significant delay in the supply of raw material components related to an ongoing clinical trial could considerably delay completion of our clinical trials, product testing and potential regulatory approval.

We do not expect to have the resources or capacity to engage in our own commercial manufacturing of our product candidates, if they received marketing approval, and would likely continue to be heavily dependent upon third-party manufacturers. Our dependence on third parties to manufacture and supply clinical trial materials, as well as our planned dependence on third party manufacturers for any products that may be approved, may adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize products in a timely or cost-effective manner, or at all.

In addition, because of the sometimes-limited number of third parties who specialize in the development, manufacture and/or supply of our clinical and preclinical materials, we are often compelled to accept contractual terms that we deem less than desirable, including without limitation as pertains representations and warranties, supply disruptions/failures, covenants and liability/indemnification. Especially as pertains liability and indemnification provisions, because of the frequent disparities in negotiating leverage, we are often compelled to agree to low caps on counterparty liability and/or indemnification language that could result in outsized liability to us in situations where we have zero or relatively little culpability.

We rely heavily on third parties for the development and manufacturing of products and product candidates.

Certain of our partner companies, on whose successes we largely rely, are early-stage biopharmaceutical companies with limited operating histories. To date, we have engaged primarily in intellectual property acquisitions, and evaluative and R&D activities and have not generated any revenues from product sales (except through Journey). We have incurred significant net losses since our inception. As of December 31, 2020, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $482.8 million. We may need to rely on third parties for activities critical to the product candidate development process, including but not necessarily limited to:

●

identifying and evaluating product candidates;

Table of Contents

●

negotiating, drafting and entering into licensing and other arrangements with product development partners; and

●

continuing to undertake pre-clinical development and designing and executing clinical trials.

We have also not demonstrated the ability to perform the functions necessary for the successful commercialization of any of our pre-market product candidates, should any of them be approved for marketing. If we were to have any such product candidates approved, the successful commercialization of such products would be dependent on us performing or contracting with third parties for performance, of a variety of critical functions, including, but not necessarily limited to:

●

advising and participating in regulatory approval processes;

●

formulating and manufacturing products for clinical development programs and commercial sale; and

●

conducting sales and marketing activities.

Our operations have been limited to acquiring, developing and securing the proprietary rights for, and undertaking pre-clinical development and clinical trials of, product candidates, both at the Fortress level and via our partner companies. These operations provide a limited basis for our stockholders and prospective investors to assess our ability to develop and commercialize potential product candidates, as well as for you to assess the advisability of investing in our securities.

We rely on third parties to conduct clinical trials. If these third parties do not meet agreed-upon deadlines or otherwise conduct the trials as required, our clinical development programs could be delayed or unsuccessful, and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our product candidates when expected or at all.

We rely on third-party contract research organizations and site management organizations to conduct most of our preclinical studies and all of our clinical trials for our product candidates. We expect to continue to rely on third parties, such as contract research organizations, site management organizations, clinical data management organizations, medical institutions and clinical investigators, to conduct some of our preclinical studies and all of our clinical trials. These CROs, investigators, and other third parties will and do play a significant role in the conduct of our trials and the subsequent collection and analysis of data from the clinical trials.

There is no guarantee that any CROs, investigators or other third parties upon which we rely for administration and conduct of our clinical trials will devote adequate time and resources to such trials or perform as contractually required. If any of these third parties fails to meet expected deadlines or fails to adhere to our clinical protocols or otherwise perform in a substandard manner, our clinical trials may be extended, delayed or terminated. If any of the clinical trial sites terminates for any reason, we may lose follow-up information on patients enrolled in our ongoing clinical trials unless the care of those patients is transferred to another qualified clinical trial site. In addition, principal investigators for our clinical trials may serve as scientific advisers or consultants to us from time to time and receive cash or equity compensation in connection with such services. If these relationships and any related compensation result in perceived or actual conflicts of interest, the integrity of the data generated at the applicable clinical trial site, or the FDA’s willingness to accept such data, may be jeopardized.

Our reliance on these third parties for research and development activities will reduce our control over these activities but will not relieve us of our responsibilities or potential liability. For example, we will remain responsible for ensuring that each of our preclinical studies and clinical trials are conducted in accordance with the general investigational plan and protocols for the trial and for ensuring that our preclinical studies are conducted in accordance with good laboratory practice (“GLP”) as appropriate. Moreover, the FDA requires us to comply with standards, commonly referred to as good clinical practices (“GCPs”) for conducting, recording and reporting the results of clinical trials to assure that data and reported results are credible and accurate and that the rights, integrity and confidentiality of trial participants are protected. Regulatory authorities enforce these requirements through periodic inspections of trial sponsors, clinical investigators and trial sites. If we or any of our clinical research organizations fail to comply with applicable GCPs, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may refuse to accept such data, or require us to perform additional clinical trials before approving our marketing applications. We cannot assure you that, upon inspection by a given regulatory authority, such regulatory authority will determine that any of our clinical trials complies with GCP regulations. In addition, our clinical trials must be conducted with products produced under CGMP in strict conformity to CGMP regulations. Our failure to comply with these regulations may require us to repeat clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory approval process.

Table of Contents

We also are required to register ongoing clinical trials and post the results of completed clinical trials on a government-sponsored database, ClinicalTrials.gov, within specified timeframes. Failure to do so can result in fines, adverse publicity and civil and criminal sanctions.

If any of our relationships with these third-party contract research organizations or site management organizations terminates, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative contract research organizations or site management organizations or to do so on commercially reasonable terms. Switching or adding additional contract research organizations or site management organizations involves additional cost and requires management time and focus. In addition, there is a natural transition period when a new contract research organization or site management organization commences work. As a result, delays could occur, which could compromise our ability to meet our desired development timelines. Though we carefully manage our relationships with our contract research organizations or site management organizations, there can be no assurance that we will not encounter similar challenges or delays in the future.

We rely on clinical and pre-clinical data and results obtained by third parties that could ultimately prove to be inaccurate or unreliable.

As part of the strategy we implement to mitigate development risk, we seek to develop product candidates with well-studied mechanisms of action, and we intend to utilize biomarkers to assess potential clinical efficacy early in the development process. This strategy necessarily relies upon clinical and pre-clinical data and other results produced or obtained by third parties, which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate or unreliable. If the third-party data and results we rely upon prove to be inaccurate, unreliable or not applicable to our product candidates, we could make inaccurate assumptions and/or conclusions about our product candidates, and our research and development efforts could be compromised or called into question during the review of any marketing applications that we submit.

Collaborative relationships with third parties could cause us to expend significant resources and/or incur substantial business risk with no assurance of financial return.

We anticipate substantial reliance on strategic collaborations for marketing and commercializing our existing product candidates and we may rely even more on strategic collaborations for R&D of other product candidates. We may sell product offerings through strategic partnerships with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. If we are unable to establish or manage such strategic collaborations on terms favorable to us in the future, our revenue and drug development may be limited.

If we enter into R&D collaborations during the early phases of drug development, success will, in part, depend on the performance of research collaborators. We may not directly control the amount or timing of resources devoted by research collaborators to activities related to product candidates. Research collaborators may not commit sufficient resources to our R&D programs. If any research collaborator fails to commit sufficient resources, the preclinical or clinical development programs related to the collaboration could be delayed or terminated. Also, collaborators may pursue existing or other development-stage products or alternative technologies in preference to those being developed in collaboration with us. Finally, if we fail to make required milestone or royalty payments to collaborators or to observe other obligations in agreements with them, the collaborators may have the right to terminate or stop performance of those agreements.

Establishing strategic collaborations is difficult and time-consuming. Our discussions with potential collaborators may not lead to the establishment of collaborations on favorable terms, if at all. Potential collaborators may reject collaboration proposals based upon their assessment of our financial, regulatory or intellectual property positions. Even if we successfully establish new collaborations, these relationships may never result in the successful development or commercialization of product candidates or the generation of sales revenue. To the extent that we enter into collaborative arrangements, the related product revenues that might follow are likely to be lower than if we directly marketed and sold products. Such collaborators may also consider alternative product candidates or technologies for similar indications that may be available to collaborate on, and such collaborations could be more attractive than the one with us for any future product candidate.

Management of our relationships with collaborators will require:

●

significant time and effort from our management team;

●

coordination of our marketing and R&D programs with the respective marketing and R&D priorities of our collaborators; and

●

effective allocation of our resources to multiple projects.

Table of Contents

Risks Pertaining to Intellectual Property and Potential Disputes with Licensors Thereof

If we are unable to obtain and maintain sufficient patent protection for our technology and products, our competitors could develop and commercialize technology and products similar or identical to ours, and our ability to successfully commercialize our technology and products may be impaired.

Our success depends, in large part, on our ability to obtain patent protection for product candidates and their formulations and uses. The patent application process is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, and there can be no assurance that we or our partners will be successful in obtaining patents or what the scope of an issued patent may ultimately be. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following:

●

patent applications may not result in any patents being issued, or the scope of issued patents may not extend to competitive product candidates and their formulations and uses developed or produced by others;

●

our competitors, many of which have substantially greater resources than we or our partners do, and many of which have made significant investments in competing technologies, may seek, or may already have obtained, patents that may limit or interfere with our abilities to make, use, and sell potential product candidates, file new patent applications, or may affect any pending patent applications that we may have;

●

there may be significant pressure on the U.S. government and other international governmental bodies to limit the scope of patent protection both inside and outside the United States for disease treatments that prove successful as a matter of public policy regarding worldwide health concerns; and

●

countries other than the United States may have patent laws less favorable to patentees than those upheld by U.S. courts, allowing foreign competitors a better opportunity to create, develop and market competing products.

In addition, patents that may be issued or in-licensed may be challenged, invalidated, modified, revoked, circumvented, found to be unenforceable, or otherwise may not provide any competitive advantage. Moreover, we may be subject to a third-party pre-issuance submission of prior art to the US Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”), or become involved in opposition, derivation, reexamination, inter partes review, post-grant review or interference proceedings challenging our patent rights or the patent rights of others. The costs of these proceedings could be substantial, and it is possible that our efforts to establish priority of invention would be unsuccessful, resulting in a material adverse effect on our US patent positions. An adverse determination in any such submission, patent office trial, proceeding or litigation could reduce the scope of, render unenforceable, or invalidate, our patent rights, allow third parties to commercialize our technologies or products and compete directly with us, without payment to us, or result in our inability to manufacture or commercialize products without infringing third-party patent rights. In addition, if the breadth or strength of protection provided by our patents and patent applications is threatened, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to license, develop or commercialize current or future product candidates. Third parties are often responsible for maintaining patent protection for our product candidates, at our and their expense. If that party fails to appropriately prosecute and maintain patent protection for a product candidate, our abilities to develop and commercialize products may be adversely affected, and we may not be able to prevent competitors from making, using and selling competing products. Such a failure to properly protect intellectual property rights relating to any of our product candidates could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, U.S. patent laws may change, which could prevent or limit us from filing patent applications or patent claims to protect products and/or technologies or limit the exclusivity periods that are available to patent holders, as well as affect the validity, enforceability, or scope of issued patents.

Table of Contents

We and our licensors also rely on trade secrets and proprietary know-how to protect product candidates. Although we have taken steps to protect our and their trade secrets and unpatented know-how, including entering into confidentiality and non-use agreements with third parties, and proprietary information and invention assignment agreements with employees, consultants and advisers, third parties may still come upon this same or similar information independently. Despite these efforts, any of these parties may also breach the agreements and may unintentionally or willfully disclose our or our licensors’ proprietary information, including our trade secrets, and we may not be able to identify such breaches or obtain adequate remedies. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret is difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, some courts inside and outside the United States are less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets. Moreover, if any of our or our licensors’ trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor, we and our licensors would have no right to prevent them, or those to whom they communicate it, from using that technology or information to compete with us. If any of our or our licensors’ trade secrets were to be disclosed to or independently developed by a competitor, our competitive positions would be harmed.

The patent prosecution process is expensive and time-consuming, and we may not be able to file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. It is also possible that we will fail to identify any patentable aspects of our research and development output and methodology, and, even if we do, an opportunity to obtain patent protection may have passed. Given the uncertain and time-consuming process of filing patent applications and prosecuting them, it is possible that our product(s) or process(es) originally covered by the scope of the patent application may have changed or been modified, leaving our product(s) or process(es) without patent protection. If our licensors or we fail to obtain or maintain patent protection or trade secret protection for one or more product candidates or any future product candidate we may license or acquire, third parties may be able to leverage our proprietary information and products without risk of infringement, which could impair our ability to compete in the market and adversely affect our ability to generate revenues and achieve profitability. Moreover, should we enter into other collaborations we may be required to consult with or cede control to collaborators regarding the prosecution, maintenance and enforcement of licensed patents. Therefore, these patents and applications may not be prosecuted and enforced in a manner consistent with the best interests of our business.

The patent position of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies generally is highly uncertain, involves complex legal and factual questions and has in recent years been the subject of much litigation. In addition, no consistent policy regarding the breadth of claims allowed in pharmaceutical or biotechnology patents has emerged to date in the US. The patent situation outside the US is even more uncertain. The laws of foreign countries may not protect our rights to the same extent as the laws of the US, and we may fail to seek or obtain patent protection in all major markets. For example, European patent law restricts the patentability of methods of treatment of the human body more than US law does. We might also become involved in derivation proceedings in the event that a third party misappropriates one or more of our inventions and files their own patent application directed to such one or more inventions. The costs of these proceedings could be substantial, and it is possible that our efforts to establish priority of invention (or that a third party derived an invention from us) would be unsuccessful, resulting in a material adverse effect on our US patent position. As a result, the issuance, scope, validity, enforceability and commercial value of our patent rights are highly uncertain. Our pending and future patent applications may not result in patents being issued which protect our technology or products, in whole or in part, or which effectively prevent others from commercializing competitive technologies and products. Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the US and other countries may diminish the value of our patents or narrow the scope of our patent protection. For example, the federal courts of the US have taken an increasingly dim view of the patent eligibility of certain subject matter, such as naturally occurring nucleic acid sequences, amino acid sequences and certain methods of utilizing same, which include their detection in a biological sample and diagnostic conclusions arising from their detection. Such subject matter, which had long been a staple of the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical industry to protect their discoveries, is now considered, with few exceptions, ineligible in the first instance for protection under the patent laws of the US. Accordingly, we cannot predict the breadth of claims that may be allowed and remain enforceable in our patents or in those licensed from a third party.

Table of Contents

Recent patent reform legislation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents. On September 16, 2011, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, or the Leahy-Smith Act, was signed into law. The Leahy-Smith Act includes a number of significant changes to United States patent law. These include changes to transition from a “first-to-invent” system to a “first inventor-to-file” system and to the way issued patents are challenged. The formation of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board now provides a less burdensome, quicker and less expensive process for challenging issued patents. The PTO recently developed new regulations and procedures to govern administration of the Leahy-Smith Act, and many of the substantive changes to patent law associated with the Leahy-Smith Act, and in particular, the first inventor-to-file provisions, only became effective on March 16, 2013. Accordingly, it is not clear what, if any, impact the Leahy-Smith Act will have on the operation of our business. However, the Leahy-Smith Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Even if our patent applications issue as patents, they may not issue in a form that will provide us with any meaningful protection, prevent competitors from competing with us or otherwise provide us with any competitive advantage. Our competitors may be able to circumvent our owned or licensed patents by developing similar or alternative technologies or products in a non-infringing manner.

We also may rely on the regulatory period of market exclusivity for any of our biologic product candidates that are successfully developed and approved for commercialization. Although this period in the United States is generally 12 years from the date of marketing approval (depending on the nature of the specific product), there is a risk that the U.S. Congress could amend laws to significantly shorten this exclusivity period. Once any regulatory period of exclusivity expires, depending on the status of our patent coverage and the nature of the product, we may not be able to prevent others from marketing products that are biosimilar to or interchangeable with our products, which would materially adversely affect our business.

If we or our licensors are sued for infringing intellectual property rights of third parties, it will be costly and time consuming, and an unfavorable outcome in that litigation would have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our success also depends on our ability, and the abilities of any of our respective current or future collaborators, to develop, manufacture, market and sell product candidates without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties. Numerous U.S. and foreign issued patents and pending patent applications, which are owned by third parties, exist in the fields in which we are developing products, some of which may be directed at claims that overlap with the subject matter of our or our licensors’ intellectual property. Because patent applications can take many years to issue, there may be currently pending applications, unknown to us, which may later result in issued patents that our product candidates or proprietary technologies may infringe. Similarly, there may be issued patents relevant to our product candidates of which we or our licensors are not aware. Publications of discoveries in the scientific literature often lag behind the actual discoveries, and patent applications in the US and other jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after a first filing, or in some cases not at all. Therefore, we cannot know with certainty whether we or such licensors were the first to make the inventions claimed in patents or pending patent applications that we own or licensed, or that we and our licensors were the first to file for patent protection of such inventions. In the event that a third party has also filed a US patent application relating to our product candidates or a similar invention, depending upon the priority dates claimed by the competing parties, we may have to participate in interference proceedings declared by the PTO to determine priority of invention in the US. The costs of these proceedings could be substantial, and it is possible that our efforts to establish priority of invention would be unsuccessful, resulting in a material adverse effect on our U.S. patent position. As a result, the issuance, scope, validity, enforceability and commercial value of our or any of our licensors’ patent rights are highly uncertain.

There is a substantial amount of litigation involving patent and other intellectual property rights in the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical industries generally. If a third party claims that we or any of our licensors, suppliers or collaborators infringe the third party’s intellectual property rights, we may have to, among other things:

●

obtain additional licenses, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all;

●

abandon an infringing product candidate or redesign products or processes to avoid infringement, which may demand substantial funds, time and resources and which may result in inferior or less desirable processes and/or products;

●

pay substantial damages, including the possibility of treble damages and attorneys’ fees, if a court decides that the product or proprietary technology at issue infringes on or violates the third party’s rights;

●

pay substantial royalties, fees and/or grant cross-licenses to our product candidates; and/or

Table of Contents

●

defend litigation or administrative proceedings which may be costly regardless of outcome, and which could result in a substantial diversion of financial and management resources.

We may be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents or the patents of licensors, which could be expensive, time consuming and unsuccessful.

Competitors may infringe our or our licensors’ patents. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file infringement claims, which can be expensive and time-consuming. Any claims we assert against accused infringers could provoke these parties to assert counterclaims against us alleging invalidity of our or our licensors’ patents or that we infringe their patents; or provoke those parties to petition the PTO to institute inter partes review against the asserted patents, which may lead to a finding that all or some of the claims of the patent are invalid. In addition, in a patent infringement proceeding, a court may decide that a patent of ours or our licensor’s is invalid or unenforceable, in whole or in part, construe the patent’s claims narrowly or refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our or our licensors’ patents do not cover the technology in question. An adverse result in any litigation or defense proceedings could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated, found to be unenforceable, or interpreted narrowly and could likewise put pending patent applications at risk of not issuing. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation.

We in-license from third parties the intellectual property needed to develop and commercialize products and product candidates. As such, any dispute with the licensors or non-performance of such license agreements may adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize the applicable product candidates.

The patents, patent applications and other intellectual property rights underpinning the vast majority of our existing product candidates were in-licensed from third parties. Under the terms of such license agreements, the licensors generally have the right to terminate such agreements in the event of a material breach. The licenses require us to make annual, milestone or other payments prior to commercialization of any product, and our ability to make these payments depends on the ability to generate cash in the future. These license agreements also generally require the use of diligent and reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize product candidates.

If there is any conflict, dispute, disagreement or issue of non-performance between us or one of our partners, on the one hand, and the respective licensing partner, on the other hand, regarding the rights or obligations under the license agreements, including any conflict, dispute or disagreement arising from a failure to satisfy payment obligations under such agreements, the ability to develop and commercialize the affected product candidate may be adversely affected.

The types of disputes that may arise between us and the third parties from whom we license intellectual property include, but are not necessarily limited to:

●

the scope of rights granted under such license agreements and other interpretation-related issues;

●

the extent to which our technologies and processes infringe on intellectual property of the licensor that is not subject to such license agreements;

●

the scope and interpretation of the representations and warranties made to us by our licensors, including those pertaining to the licensors’ right title and interest in the licensed technology and the licensors’ right to grant the licenses contemplated by such agreements;

●

the sublicensing of patent and other rights under our license agreements and/or collaborative development relationships, and the rights and obligations associated with such sublicensing, including whether or not a given transaction constitutes a sublicense under such license agreement;

●

the diligence and development obligations under license agreements (which may include specific diligence milestones) and what activities or achievements satisfy those diligence obligations;

●

whether or not the milestones associated with certain milestone payment obligations have been achieved or satisfied;

●

the applicability or scope of indemnification claims or obligations under such license agreements;

Table of Contents

●

the permissibility and advisability of, and strategy regarding, the pursuit of potential third-party infringers of the intellectual property that is the subject of such license agreements;

●

the calculation of royalty, milestone, sublicense revenue and other payment obligations under such license agreements;

●

the extent to which rights, if any, are retained by licensors under such license agreements;

●

whether or not a material breach has occurred under such license agreements and the extent to which such breach, if deemed to have occurred, is or can be cured within applicable cure periods, if any;

●

disputes regarding patent filing and prosecution decisions, as well as payment obligations regarding past and ongoing patent expenses;

●

intellectual property rights resulting from the joint creation or use of intellectual property (including improvements made to licensed intellectual property) by our and our partners’ licensors and us and our partners; and

●

the priority of invention of patented technology.

In addition, the agreements under which we currently license intellectual property or technology from third parties are complex, and certain provisions in such agreements may be susceptible to multiple interpretations or may conflict in such a way that puts us in breach of one or more agreements, which would make us susceptible to lengthy and expensive disputes with one or more of such third-party licensing partners. The resolution of any contract interpretation disagreement that may arise could narrow what we believe to be the scope of our rights to the relevant intellectual property or technology, or increase what we believe to be our financial or other obligations under the relevant agreements, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Moreover, if disputes over intellectual property that we have licensed prevent or impair our ability to maintain our current licensing arrangements on commercially acceptable terms, we may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize the affected product candidates, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions, results of operations and prospects.

Risks Pertaining to the Commercialization of Product Candidates

If any of our product candidates are successfully developed but do not achieve broad market acceptance among physicians, patients, healthcare payors and the medical community, the revenues that any such product candidates generate from sales will be limited.

Even if our product candidates receive regulatory approval, they may not gain market acceptance among physicians, patients, healthcare payors and the medical community. Coverage and reimbursement of our product candidates by third-party payors, including government payors, generally would also be necessary for commercial success. The degree of market acceptance of any approved products would depend on a number of factors, including, but not necessarily limited to:

●

the efficacy and safety as demonstrated in clinical trials;

●

the timing of market introduction of such product candidate as well as competitive products;

●

the clinical indications for which the product is approved;

●

acceptance by physicians, major operators of hospitals and clinics and patients of the product as a safe and effective treatment;

●

the potential and perceived advantages of product candidates over alternative treatments;

●

the safety of product candidates in a broader patient group (i.e., based on actual use);

●

the availability, cost and benefits of treatment, in relation to alternative treatments;

●

the availability of adequate reimbursement and pricing by third parties and government authorities;

Table of Contents

●

changes in regulatory requirements by government authorities for our product candidates;

●

the product labeling or product insert required by the FDA or regulatory authority in other countries, including any contradictions, warnings, drug interactions, or other precautions;

●

changes in the standard of care for the targeted indications for our product candidate or future product candidates, which could reduce the marketing impact of any labeling or marketing claims that we could make following FDA approval;

●

relative convenience and ease of administration;

●

the prevalence and severity of side effects and adverse events;

●

the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts; and

●

unfavorable publicity relating to the product.

If any product candidate is approved but does not achieve an adequate level of acceptance by physicians, hospitals, healthcare payors and patients, we may not generate sufficient revenue from these products and in turn we may not become or remain profitable. In addition, our efforts to educate the medical community and third-party payors on the benefits of our product candidates may require significant resources and may never be successful.

Even if approved, any product candidates that we may develop and market may be later withdrawn from the market or subject to promotional limitations.

We may not be able to obtain the desired labeling claims or scheduling classifications necessary or desirable for the promotion of our marketed products (or our product candidates if approved). We may also be required to undertake post-marketing clinical trials. If the results of such post-marketing studies are not satisfactory or if adverse events or other safety issues arise after approval while our products are on the market, the FDA or a comparable regulatory authority in another jurisdiction may withdraw marketing authorization or may condition continued marketing on commitments from us that may be expensive and/or time consuming to complete. In addition, if manufacturing problems occur, regulatory approval may be impacted or withdrawn and reformulation of our products, additional clinical trials, changes in labeling of our products and additional marketing applications may be required. Any reformulation or labeling changes may limit the marketability of such products if approved.

We face potential product liability exposure, and if successful claims are brought against us, we may incur substantial liability for one or more of our product candidates or a future product candidate we may license or acquire and may have to limit their commercialization.

The use of one or more of our product candidates and any future product candidate we may license or acquire in clinical trials and the sale of any products for which we obtain marketing approval expose us to the risk of product liability claims. For example, we may be sued if any product we develop allegedly causes injury or is found to be otherwise unsuitable during clinical testing, manufacturing, marketing or sale. Any such product liability claims may include allegations of defects in manufacturing, defects in design, a failure to warn of dangers inherent in the product, negligence, strict liability or a breach of warranties. Product liability claims might be brought against us by consumers, health care providers or others using, administering or selling our products. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against these claims, we will incur substantial liabilities. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:

●

withdrawal of clinical trial participants;

●

suspension or termination of clinical trial sites or entire trial programs;

●

decreased demand for any product candidates or products that we may develop;

●

initiation of investigations by regulators;

●

impairment of our business reputation;

Table of Contents

●

costs of related litigation;

●

substantial monetary awards to patients or other claimants;

●

loss of revenues;

●

reduced resources of our management to pursue our business strategy; and

●

the inability to commercialize our product candidate or future product candidates.

Our partner company Journey has acquired an isotretinoin product and will begin marketing that product under the Accutane® brand name in Q2 2021. Isotretinoin has a black box warning for use in pregnant women. Isotretinoin also has warnings for side effects related to psychiatric disorders and inflammatory bowel disease, among others. Historically, isotretinoin has been the subject of significant product liability claims, mainly related to irritable bowel disease . Currently, there is no significant isotretinoin product liability litigation. The federal multi-district litigation (“MDL”) court dismissed all remaining federal isotretinoin cases in 2014 after ruling that the warning label on the drug was adequate. The MDL dissolved in 2015, which effectively put an end to federal lawsuits. Cases continued in New Jersey state court until 2017, when the trial court judge dismissed the remaining the isotretinoin product liability cases. Thus, should a product liability claim against Journey be brought related to its isotretinoin product, we have substantial defenses. However, it is not feasible to predict the ultimate outcome of any litigation and the Company could in the future be required to pay significant amounts as a result of settlement or judgments should such new product liability claims be brought.

We will obtain limited product liability insurance coverage for all of our upcoming clinical trials. However, our insurance coverage may not reimburse us or may not be sufficient to reimburse us for any expenses or losses we may suffer. Moreover, insurance coverage is becoming increasingly expensive, and, in the future, we may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in sufficient amounts to protect us against losses due to liability. When needed we intend to expand our insurance coverage to include the sale of commercial products if we obtain marketing approval for one or more of our product candidates in development, but we may be unable to obtain commercially reasonable product liability insurance for any products approved for marketing. On occasion, large judgments have been awarded in class action lawsuits based on drugs that had unanticipated side effects. A successful product liability claim or series of claims brought against us could cause our stock price to fall and, if judgments exceed our insurance coverage, could decrease our cash and adversely affect our business.

Additionally, we have entered into various agreements under which we indemnify third parties for certain claims relating to product candidates. These indemnification obligations may require us to pay significant sums of money for claims that are covered by these indemnifications.

Any product for which we obtain marketing approval could be subject to restrictions or withdrawal from the market and we may be subject to penalties if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements or if we experience unanticipated problems with products, when and if any of them are approved.

Any product for which we obtain marketing approval, along with the authorized manufacturing facilities, processes and equipment, post-approval clinical data, labeling, advertising and promotional activities for such product, will remain subject to ongoing regulatory requirements governing drug or biological products, as well as review by the FDA and comparable regulatory authorities. These requirements include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, registration requirements, CGMP requirements relating to quality control, quality assurance and corresponding maintenance of records and documents, requirements regarding the distribution of samples to physicians and recordkeeping, and requirements regarding company presentations and interactions with healthcare professionals. Even if we obtain regulatory approval for a product, the approval may be subject to limitations on the indicated uses for which the product may be marketed or subject to conditions of approval, or contain requirements for costly post-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the safety or efficacy of the product. We also may be subject to state laws and registration requirements covering the distribution of drug products. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with products, manufacturers or manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in actions such as:

●

restrictions on product manufacturing, distribution or use;

●

restrictions on the labeling or marketing of a product;

●

requirements to conduct post-marketing studies or clinical trials;

Table of Contents

●

warning or untitled letters;

●

recalls or other withdrawal of the products from the market;

●

refusal to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications that we submit;

●

fines;

●

suspension or withdrawal of marketing or regulatory approvals;

●

refusal to permit the import or export of products;

●

product seizure or detentions;

●

injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties; and

●

adverse publicity.

If we or our suppliers, third-party contractors, clinical investigators or collaborators are slow to adapt, or are unable to adapt, to changes in existing regulatory requirements or adoption of new regulatory requirements or policies, we or our collaborators may be subject to the actions listed above, including losing marketing approval for products when and if any of them are approved, resulting in decreased revenue from milestones, product sales or royalties.

We will need to obtain FDA approval of any proposed product brand names, and any failure or delay associated with such approval may adversely impact our business.

A pharmaceutical product cannot be marketed in the U.S. or other countries until the relevant governmental authority has completed a rigorous and extensive regulatory review process, including approval of a brand name. Any brand names we intend to use for our product candidates in the U.S. will require approval from the FDA regardless of whether we have secured a formal trademark registration from the PTO. The FDA typically conducts a review of proposed product brand names, including an evaluation of potential for confusion with other product names. The FDA may also object to a product brand name if it believes the name inappropriately implies medical claims. If the FDA objects to any of our proposed product brand names, we may be required to adopt an alternative brand name for our product candidates. If we adopt an alternative brand name, we would lose the benefit of our existing trademark applications for such product candidate and may be required to expend significant additional resources in an effort to identify a suitable product brand name that would qualify under applicable trademark laws, not infringe the existing rights of third parties and be acceptable to the FDA. We may be unable to build a successful brand identity for a new trademark in a timely manner or at all, which would limit our ability to commercialize our product candidates.

Risks Pertaining to Legislation and Regulation Affecting the Biopharmaceutical and Other Industries

We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative or executive action, either in the United States or abroad.

We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of how government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative or executive action taken by the U.S. presidential administration may impact our business and industry. In particular, the former U.S. President took several executive actions, specifically through rulemaking and guidance, that could impact the pharmaceutical business and industry. Shortly after taking office in January 2021, President Biden announced that his Administration would be freezing a number of the prior Administration’s drug pricing reforms, while others remain subject to both executive orders or regulatory changes issued by the Department of Health and Human Services. A few of the major administrative actions include:

●

On October 30, 2019, the Trump Administration issued an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (“ANPRM”) entitled, International Pricing Index Model for Medicare Part B Drugs. This ANPRM was intended to solicit feedback on a potential proposal to align United States drug prices in the Medicare Part B program with international prices. It also solicited public feedback on a policy that would allowing private-sector vendors to negotiate prices, take title to drugs, and improve competition for hospital and physician business. Although this is only a notice for a potential rule, it signals the Administration’s desire to regulatorily influence the United States drug pricing system that could adversely affect the industry.

Table of Contents

●

On November 15, 2019, CMS issued a proposed rule entitled, Transparency in Coverage and finalized the Calendar Year (“CY”) 2020 Outpatient Prospective Payment System (“OPPS”) & Ambulatory Surgical Center Price Transparency Requirements for Hospitals to Make Standard Charges Rule. Together the rules would increase price transparency through health plans and in hospitals. The affects may influence consumer purchasing habits in the health care sector as a whole. Although the transparency provisions are not yet in effect and the hospital price transparency requirements are subject to litigation, there could be implications for the industry related to drug pricing if or when it is enacted.

●

On November 18, 2019, CMS issued a proposed rule entitled, Medicaid Fiscal Accountability Regulation (“MFAR”). The proposed rule would significantly impact states’ ability to finance their Medicaid programs. If finalized, the MFAR could force states to restructure their Medicaid financing that could disincentivize or change state prescription drug purchasing behavior that would adversely impact the industry.

●

On December 18, 2019, the FDA issued a proposed rule entitled, Importation of Prescription Drugs. The proposed rule would allow the importation of certain prescription drugs from Canada. If finalized, states or other non-federal government entities would be able to submit importation program proposals to FDA for review and authorization. This proposed rule could also influence pricing practices in the United States.

●

On January 30, 2020, CMS issued a state waiver option entitled, Health Adult Opportunity (“HAO”). The HAO would allow states to restructure benefits and coverage policies for their Medicaid programs. The HAO will provide states administrative flexibilities in exchange for a capped federal share. The cap on the federal share is commonly referred to as a “block grant.” Importantly, the HAO allows states to set formularies that align with Essential Health Benefit requirements while still requiring manufacturers to participate in the Medicaid Rebate Program. Depending on utilization of the HAO by states, it could impact the industry – especially if states elect to use a formulary.

●

On December 2, 2020, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) issued a final rule entitled, Modernizing and Clarifying the Physician Self-Referral Regulations and on the same day the HHS Office of Inspector General finalized a similar rule, entitled Revisions to Safe Harbors Under the Anti-Kickback Statute, and Civil Monetary penalty Rules Regarding Beneficiary Inducements. The rules are an effort to reform regulations dealing with anti-kickback and self-referral laws. These rules allow certain financial arrangements that would otherwise violate anti-kickback and self-referral laws for providers that are participating in value-based payment arrangements. The rule could impact drug purchasing behavior to ensure providers are within their budget and/or restructure existing payment structures between providers and manufacturers.

As with any change in the Executive Office, and particularly with respect to changes from a Republican Administration under former President Trump to a Democratic Administration under President Biden, we expect there to be significant changes to existing rules, regulations and policies, the enactment of new Executive Orders and other immediate or iterative political, legislative and administrative changes, affecting the pharmaceutical industry. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative or executive action, either in the United States, or based on similar governmental changes in other countries.

Our current and future relationships with customers and third-party payors in the United States and elsewhere may be subject, directly or indirectly, to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse, false claims, transparency, health information privacy and security and other healthcare laws and regulations, which could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm, administrative burdens and diminished profits and future earnings.

Healthcare providers, physicians and third-party payors in the U.S. and elsewhere will play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of any product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. Our future arrangements with third-party payors and customers may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations, including, without limitation, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and the federal False Claims Act, which may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we sell, market and distribute any product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. In addition, we may be subject to transparency laws and patient privacy regulation by the federal and state governments and by governments in foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct our business. The applicable federal, state and foreign healthcare laws and regulations that may affect our ability to operate include, but are not necessarily limited to:

●

the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward, or in return for, either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or recommendation of, any good or service, for which payment may be made under federal and state healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid;

Table of Contents

●

federal civil and criminal false claims laws and civil monetary penalty laws, including the federal False Claims Act, which impose criminal and civil penalties, including civil whistleblower or qui tam actions, against individuals or entities for knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, to the federal government, including the Medicare and Medicaid programs, claims for payment that are false or fraudulent or making a false statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government; the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, which imposes criminal and civil liability for executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or making false statements relating to healthcare matters;

●

HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, or HITECH, and their respective implementing regulations, which impose obligations on covered healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses, as well as their business associates that create, receive, maintain or transmit individually identifiable health information for or on behalf of a covered entity, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information;

●

the federal Open Payments program, which requires manufacturers of certain drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, with specific exceptions, to report annually to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, information related to “payments or other transfers of value” made to “covered recipients,” which include physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors, and teaching hospitals) and applicable manufacturers. Applicable group purchasing organizations also are required to report annually to CMS the ownership and investment interests held by the physicians and their immediate family members. The SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act added to the definition of covered recipient practitioners including physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, certified registered nurse anesthetists and certified nurse-midwives effective in 2022. Data collection began on August 1, 2013 with requirements for manufacturers to submit reports to CMS by March 31, 2014 and 90 days after the end of each subsequent calendar year. Disclosure of such information was made by CMS on a publicly available website beginning in September 2014; and

●

analogous state and foreign laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may apply to sales or marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by non-governmental third-party payors, including private insurers; state and foreign laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers; state and foreign laws that require drug manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers or marketing expenditures; and state and foreign laws governing the privacy and security of health information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.

Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements with third parties will comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations may involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, including, without limitation, damages, fines, imprisonment, exclusion from participation in government healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our businesses. If any of the physicians or other healthcare providers or entities with whom we expect to do business, including our collaborators, is found not to be in compliance with applicable laws, it may be subject to criminal, civil or administrative sanctions, including exclusions from participation in government healthcare programs, which could also materially affect our businesses.

As we continue to execute our growth strategy, we may be subject to further government regulation which could adversely affect our financial results, including without limitation the Investment Company Act of 1940.

If we engage in business combinations and other transactions that result in holding minority or non-control investment interests in a number of entities, we may become subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”). If we do become subject to the Investment Company Act, we would be required to register as an investment company and could be expected to incur significant registration and compliance costs in the future.

Table of Contents

General Risks

Major public health issues, and specifically the pandemic caused by the coronavirus COVID-19 outbreak, could have an adverse effect on the clinical trials of our partner companies, and as a result, have an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations and other aspects of our business.

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus which causes a disease referred to as COVID-19, was first detected in Wuhan, China, and has since spread worldwide. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared that the rapidly spreading COVID-19 outbreak had evolved into a pandemic. In response to the pandemic, many governments around the world are implementing a variety of control measures to reduce the spread of COVID-19, including travel restrictions and bans, instructions to residents to practice social distancing, quarantine advisories, shelter-in-place orders and required closures of non-essential businesses.

The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted the global economy, disrupted global supply chains, and created significant volatility and disruption of financial markets. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our business and operating results will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be accurately predicted, including new information that may emerge concerning the virus and the actions to contain it or treat its impact, among others.

Some factors from the COVID-19 outbreak that may delay or otherwise adversely affect our or our partner companies’ clinical trial programs, as well as adversely impact our business generally, include:

●

delays or difficulties in clinical site initiation, including difficulties in recruiting clinical sites, and delays enrolling patients in our clinical trials or increased rates of patients withdrawing from our clinical trials following enrollment as a result of contracting COVID-19, being forced to quarantine, or not otherwise being able to complete study assessments, particularly for older patients or others with a higher risk of contracting COVID-19;

●

missed study visits or study procedures which could lead to an abundance of protocol deviations that have the potential to interfere with the interpretability of trial results;

●

impacts to clinical results, including an increased number of observed adverse events, as a result of participants enrolled in our clinical trials contracting COVID-19;

●

diversion of healthcare resources, including clinical trial investigators and staff, away from the conduct of clinical trials to focus on pandemic concerns which could result in delays to our partner companies’ clinical trials;

●

limitations on travel, including limitations on domestic and international travel, and government-imposed quarantines or restrictions imposed by key third parties that could interrupt key trial activities, such as clinical trial site initiations and monitoring;

●

interruption of, or delays in receiving, supplies of our product candidates from our contract manufacturing organizations due to staffing shortages, or production slowdowns or stoppages;

●

disruptions and delays caused by potential workplace, laboratory and office closures and an increased reliance on employees working from home across the healthcare system; and

●

disruptions in or delays to regulatory approvals, inspections, reviews or other regulatory activities, including review of NDAs and approvals of protocol changes or amendments to SPAs, as a result of the spread of COVID-19 affecting the operations of the FDA or other regulatory authorities.

The disruptions discussed above and other consequences of COVID-19 pandemic could result in missed study visits or study procedures in our clinical trials, which could lead to an abundance of protocol deviations that impact the interpretability of the trial results. A significant number of deviations may call into question whether the execution of a clinical trial was consistent with the protocol, which is of particular importance where study designs were agreed to as part of a Special Protocol Assessment (SPA). In extreme cases, significant deviations from the protocol may be considered a violation of a SPA and result in potential rescindment of a SPA agreement.

Table of Contents

We and our partner companies currently rely on third parties for certain functions or services in support of our clinical trials and key areas of our operations. These third parties include contract research organizations (CROs), medical institutions and clinical investigators, contract manufacturing organizations, suppliers, and external business partners supporting our preparations for commercialization. If these third parties themselves are adversely impacted by restrictions resulting from the COVID-19 outbreak, we will likely experience delays and/or realize additional costs. As a result, our or our partner companies’ efforts to obtain regulatory approvals for, and to commercialize, our or our partner companies’ product candidates may be delayed or disrupted.

In addition, as a result of government directives on social distancing and to protect the health of our workforce, we have asked our office-based employees to work remotely and have restricted domestic and international travel indefinitely.

We restricted on-site staff to only those personnel and contractors who must perform essential activities that must be completed on-site. Third parties on which we rely may also increase their use of remote working arrangements in response to COVID-19. Our increased reliance on personnel working remotely may negatively impact productivity, including our ability to monitor clinical trials, prepare regulatory applications, and conduct data analysis, or disrupt, delay, or otherwise adversely impact our business. In addition, remote working could increase our cybersecurity risk, create data accessibility concerns, and make us more susceptible to communication disruptions, any of which could adversely impact our business operations or delay necessary interactions with local and federal regulators, ethics committees, manufacturing sites, research or clinical trial sites and other important agencies and contractors.

The ability of the Company’s employees and consultants to work may be significantly impacted by the coronavirus.

The Company’s employees and consultants are being affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Substantially all of our office and management personnel are working remotely, and the Company may need to enact further precautionary measures to help minimize the risk of our employees being exposed to the coronavirus. COVID-19 may also compromise the ability of independent contractors who perform consulting services for us to deliver services or deliverables in a satisfactory or timely manner. Further, our management team is focused on mitigating the adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has required and will continue to require a large investment of time and resources, thereby diverting their attention from other priorities that existed prior to the outbreak of the pandemic. If these conditions worsen, or last for an extended period of time, the Company’s ability to manage its business may be impaired, and operational risks, cybersecurity risks and other risks facing the Company even prior to the pandemic may be elevated.

We may not be able to hire or retain key officers or employees needed to implement our business strategy and develop products and businesses.

Our success depends on the continued contributions of our executive officers, financial, scientific, and technical personnel and consultants, and on our ability to attract additional personnel as we continue to implement growth strategies and acquire and invest in companies with varied businesses. During our operating history, many essential responsibilities have been assigned to a relatively small number of individuals. However, as we continue to implement our growth strategy, the demands on our key employees will expand, and we will need to recruit additional qualified employees. The competition for such qualified personnel is intense, and the loss of services of certain key personnel, or our inability to attract additional personnel to fill critical positions, could adversely affect our business.

We currently depend heavily upon the efforts and abilities of our management team and the management teams of our partners. The loss or unavailability of the services of any of these individuals could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results. In addition, we have not obtained, do not own, and are not the beneficiary of key-person life insurance for any of our key personnel. We only maintain a limited amount of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance coverage. There can be no assurance that this coverage will be sufficient to cover the costs of the events that may occur, in which case, there could be a substantial impact on our ability to continue operations.

Table of Contents

Our employees, consultants, or third-party partners may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including but not necessarily limited to noncompliance with regulatory standards and requirements or internal procedures, policies or agreements to which such employees, consultants and partners are subject, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We are exposed to the risk of employee fraud or other misconduct. Misconduct by employees, consultants, or third-party partners could include intentional failures to comply with FDA regulations, provide accurate information to the FDA, comply with CGMPs, comply with federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations, report financial information or data accurately, comply with internal procedures, policies or agreements to which such employees, consultants or partners are subject, or disclose unauthorized activities to us. In particular, sales, marketing and business arrangements in the healthcare industry are subject to extensive laws and regulations intended to prevent fraud, kickbacks, self-dealing and other abusive practices. These laws and regulations may restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, sales commission, customer incentive programs and other business arrangements. Employee, consultant, or third-party misconduct could also involve the improper use of information obtained in the course of clinical trials, which could result in regulatory sanctions and serious harm to our reputation, as well as civil and criminal liability. The precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to be in compliance with such laws or regulations. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our business and results of operations, including the imposition of significant fines or other civil and/or criminal sanctions.

We receive a large amount of proprietary information from potential or existing licensors of intellectual property and potential acquisition target companies, all pursuant to confidentiality agreements. The confidentiality and proprietary invention assignment agreements that we have in place with each of our employees and consultants prohibit the unauthorized disclosure of such information, but such employees or consultants may nonetheless disclose such information through negligence or willful misconduct. Any such unauthorized disclosures could subject us to monetary damages and/or injunctive or equitable relief. The notes, analyses and memoranda that we have generated based on such information are also valuable to our businesses, and the unauthorized disclosure or misappropriation of such materials by our employees and consultants could significantly harm our strategic initiatives – especially if such disclosures are made to our competitor companies.

We may be subject to claims that our employees and/or consultants have wrongfully used or disclosed to us alleged trade secrets of their former employers or other clients.

As is common in the biopharmaceutical industry, we rely on employees and consultants to assist in the development of product candidates, many of whom were previously employed at, or may have previously been or are currently providing consulting services to, other biopharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. We may become subject to claims related to whether these individuals have inadvertently or otherwise used, disclosed or misappropriated trade secrets or other proprietary information of their former employers or their former or current clients. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. Even if we are successful in defending these claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and/or the employees or consultants that are implicated.

The market price of our securities may be volatile and may fluctuate in a way that is disproportionate to our operating performance.

The stock prices of our securities may experience substantial volatility as a result of a number of factors, including, but not necessarily limited to:

●

announcements we make regarding our current product candidates, acquisition of potential new product candidates and companies and/or in-licensing through multiple partners/affiliates;

●

sales or potential sales of substantial amounts of our Common Stock;

●

issuance of debt or other securities;

●

our delay or failure in initiating or completing pre-clinical or clinical trials or unsatisfactory results of any of these trials;

●

announcements about us or about our competitors, including clinical trial results, regulatory approvals or new product introductions;

Table of Contents

●

developments concerning our licensors and/or product manufacturers;

●

litigation and other developments relating to our patents or other proprietary rights or those of our competitors;

●

conditions in the pharmaceutical or biotechnology industries;

●

governmental regulation and legislation;

●

unstable regional political and economic conditions;

●

variations in our anticipated or actual operating results; and

●

change in securities analysts’ estimates of our performance, or our failure to meet analysts’ expectations.

Many of these factors are beyond our control. The stock markets in general, and the market for pharmaceutical and biotechnological companies in particular, have historically experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. These broad market and industry factors could reduce the market prices of our securities, regardless of our actual operating performance.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our Common Stock, or the perception that such sales may occur, may adversely impact the price of our Common Stock.

Almost all of the 100.8 million outstanding shares of our Common Stock, inclusive of outstanding equity awards, as of December 31, 2020 are available for sale in the public market, either pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or an effective registration statement. In addition, pursuant to our current shelf registration statement on Form S-3, from time to time we may issue and sell shares of our Common Stock or Preferred Stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $26.7 million as of December 31, 2020. Any sale of a substantial number of shares of our Common Stock or our Preferred Stock could cause a drop in the trading price of our Common Stock or Preferred Stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market.

We may not be able to manage our anticipated growth, which may in turn adversely impact our business.

We will need to continue to expend capital on improving our infrastructure to address our anticipated growth. Acquisitions of companies or products could place a strain on our management, and administrative, operational and financial systems. In addition, we may need to hire, train, and manage more employees, focusing on their integration with us and corporate culture. Integration and management issues associated with increased acquisitions may require a disproportionate amount of our management’s time and attention and distract our management from other activities related to running our business.

Table of Contents

A catastrophic disaster could damage our facilities beyond insurance limits or cause us to lose key data, which could cause us to curtail or cease operations.

We are vulnerable to damage and/or loss of vital data from natural disasters, such as earthquakes, tornadoes, power loss, fire, health epidemics and pandemics, floods and similar events, as well as from accidental loss or destruction. If any disaster were to occur, our ability to operate our businesses could be seriously impaired. We have property, liability and business interruption insurance that may not be adequate to cover losses resulting from disasters or other similar significant business interruptions, and we do not plan to purchase additional insurance to cover such losses due to the cost of obtaining such coverage. Any significant losses that are not recoverable under our insurance policies could seriously impair our business, financial condition and prospects. Any of the aforementioned circumstances, including without limitation the COVID-19 virus, may also impede our employees’ and consultants’ abilities to provide services in-person and/or in a timely manner; hinder our ability to raise funds to finance our operations on favorable terms or at all; and trigger effectiveness of “force majeure” clauses under agreements with respect to which we receive goods and services, or under which we are obligated to achieve developmental milestones on certain timeframes. Disputes with third parties over the applicability of such “force majeure” clauses, or the enforceability of developmental milestones and related extension mechanisms in light of such business interruptions, may arise and may become expensive and time-consuming.

Our ability to use our pre-change NOLs and other pre-change tax attributes to offset post-change taxable income or taxes may be subject to limitation.

We may, from time to time, carry net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) as deferred tax assets on our balance sheet. Under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change” (generally defined as a greater than 50-percentage- point cumulative change (by value) in the equity ownership of certain stockholders over a rolling three-year period), the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change NOLs and other pre-change tax attributes to offset its post-change taxable income or taxes may be limited. We may experience ownership changes in the future as a result of shifts in our stock ownership, some of which changes are outside our control. As a result, our ability to use our pre-change NOLs and other pre-change tax attributes to offset post-change taxable income or taxes may be subject to limitation.

If we fail to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, we could become subject to fines or penalties or incur costs that could harm our business.

We, and/or third parties on our behalf, may use hazardous materials, including chemicals and biological agents and compounds that could be dangerous to human health and safety or the environment. Our operations may also produce hazardous waste products. Federal, state and local laws and regulations govern the use, generation, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of these materials and wastes. Compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations may be expensive, and current or future environmental laws and regulations may impair our product development efforts. In addition, we cannot entirely eliminate the risk of accidental injury or contamination from these materials or wastes. We do not carry specific biological or hazardous waste insurance coverage, and our property and casualty and general liability insurance policies specifically exclude coverage for damages and fines arising from biological or hazardous waste exposure or contamination. Accordingly, in the event of contamination or injury, we could be held liable for damages or penalized with fines in an amount exceeding our respective resources, and clinical trials or regulatory approvals could be suspended.

Although we maintain workers’ compensation insurance to cover costs and expenses incurred due to injuries to our employees resulting from the use of hazardous materials, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. We do not maintain insurance for environmental liability or toxic tort claims that may be asserted in connection with the storage or disposal of biological or hazardous materials.

In addition, we may incur substantial costs in order to comply with current or future environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. These current or future laws and regulations may impair our research, development or production efforts. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations also may result in substantial fines, penalties or other sanctions.

Table of Contents

We have never paid and currently do not intend to pay cash dividends in the near future, except for the dividend we pay on our Series A Preferred Stock. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, will be the sole source of gain for our Common Stockholders.

We have never paid cash dividends on our Common Stock, or made stock dividends, except for the dividend we pay on shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, and we currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our businesses, and retain our stock positions. In addition, the terms of existing and future debt agreements may preclude us from paying cash or stock dividends. Equally, each of our partners is governed by its own board of directors with individual governance and decision-making regimes and mandates to oversee such entities in accordance with their respective fiduciary duties. As a result, we alone cannot determine the acts that could maximize value to you of such partners in which we maintain ownership positions, such as declaring cash or stock dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our Common Stock will be the sole source of gain for our Common Stockholders for the foreseeable future.

Changes in funding for the FDA and other government agencies could hinder their ability to hire and retain key leadership and other personnel, or otherwise prevent new products and services from being developed or commercialized in a timely manner, which could negatively impact our business or the business of our partners.

The ability of the FDA to review and approve new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, ability to hire and retain key personnel, ability to accept the payment of user fees, and statutory, regulatory, and policy changes. Average review times at the agency have fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of other government agencies that fund research and development activities is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable.

Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for new drugs to be reviewed and/or approved by necessary government agencies, which would adversely affect our business or the business of our partners. For example, over the last several years, including for 35 days beginning on December 22, 2018, the U.S. government has shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, have had to furlough nonessential FDA employees and stop routine activities. If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

If the timing of FDA’s review and approval of new products is delayed, the timing of our or our partners’ development process may be delayed, which could result in delayed milestone revenues and materially harm our operations or business.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused considerable disruptions at FDA, namely with respect to diverting FDA’s attention and resources to facilitate vaccine development and ensure rapid review and emergency use authorization of vaccines intended to prevent COVID-19. Back in March, Dr. Janet Woodcock, the Director of FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, temporarily stepped away from her role to focus on the therapeutic aspects of Operation Warp Speed, a major reorganization intended to better align FDA’s activities with the national effort to develop COVID-19 countermeasures. Dr. Woodcock later named Acting Commissioner of FDA on January 20, 2021. These changes to leadership, enhanced focus on COVID-19 countermeasures, and the reorganization and rededication or critical resources, both at FDA and within similar governmental authorities across the world, are likely to impact the ability of new products and services from being developed or commercialized in a timely manner.

Table of Contents

We will continue to incur significant increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives. Also, if we fail to maintain proper and effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, our ability to produce accurate and timely financial statements could be impaired, which could harm our operating results, investors’ views of us and, as a result, the value of our Securities.

As a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“SOX”), as well as rules subsequently implemented by the SEC, and the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Exchange. These rules impose various requirements on public companies, including requiring establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and appropriate corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel have devoted and will continue to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations increase our legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, these rules and regulations make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, our board committees or as executive officers.

SOX requires, among other things, that we maintain effective internal controls for financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. As a result, we are required to periodically perform an evaluation of our internal controls over financial reporting to allow management to report on the effectiveness of those controls, as required by Section 404 of SOX. These efforts to comply with Section 404 and related regulations have required, and continue to require, the commitment of significant financial and managerial resources. While we anticipate maintaining the integrity of our internal controls over financial reporting and all other aspects of Section 404, we cannot be certain that a material weakness will not be identified when we test the effectiveness of our control systems in the future. If a material weakness is identified, we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which would require additional financial and management resources, costly litigation or a loss of public confidence in our internal controls, which could have an adverse effect on the market price of our stock.

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws and Delaware law might discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our Company or changes in our management and, therefore, depress the trading price of our Common Stock or other Securities.

Provisions of our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws and Delaware law may have the effect of deterring unsolicited takeovers and/or delaying or preventing a change in control of our Company or changes in our management, including transactions in which our stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over then-current market prices. In addition, these provisions may limit the ability of stockholders to approve transactions that they may deem to be in their best interests. These provisions include:

●

the inability of stockholders to call special meetings; and

●

the ability of our Board of Directors to designate the terms of and issue new series of preferred stock without stockholder approval, which could include the right to approve an acquisition or other change in our control or could be used to institute a rights plan, also known as a poison pill, that would work to dilute the stock ownership of a potential hostile acquirer, likely preventing acquisitions that have not been approved by our Board of Directors.

In addition, the Delaware General Corporation Law prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in a business combination with an interested stockholder, generally a person which together with its affiliates owns, or within the last three years has owned, 15% of our voting stock, for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner.

The existence of the foregoing provisions and anti-takeover measures could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our Common Stock. They could also deter potential acquirers of our Company, thereby reducing the likelihood that you would receive a premium for your ownership of our Securities through an acquisition.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit Index


Exhibit Number		Exhibit Title

10.1		Credit Agreement entered into by and among Fortress Biotech, Inc., the lenders from time to time party thereto, and Oaktree Fund Administration, LLC on August 27, 2020. (*+)

10.2		Asset Purchase Agreement entered into by and between Sentynl Therapeutics, Inc. and Cyprium Therapeutics, Inc. dated as of February 23, 2021. (*+)

10.3		Asset Purchase Agreement entered into by and between Journey Medical Corporation and Dermira, Inc. dated as of March 31, 2021. (*+)

31.1		Certification of Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS		Inline XBRL Instance Document.(*)

101.SCH		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.(*)

101.CAL		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.(*)

101.DEF		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.(*)

101.LAB		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.(*)

101.PRE		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.(*)
104		Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).

* Filed herewith.

+ Certain confidential portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b) of Regulation S-K.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


May 17, 2021	FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC.

	By:	/s/ Lindsay A. Rosenwald, M.D.
		Lindsay A. Rosenwald, M.D., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

May 17, 2021	By:	/s/ Robyn M. Hunter
		Robyn M. Hunter Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)